输尿管软镜治疗大体积结石的疗效及输尿管鞘使用的危害:一项前瞻性随机研究。

IF 1.3 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Arab Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2024-09-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20905998.2024.2398378
Ahmed M Rammah, Farouk Khaled, Samih Zamel, Amr Elkady, Samer Morsy, Mohamed Abdelwahab
{"title":"输尿管软镜治疗大体积结石的疗效及输尿管鞘使用的危害:一项前瞻性随机研究。","authors":"Ahmed M Rammah, Farouk Khaled, Samih Zamel, Amr Elkady, Samer Morsy, Mohamed Abdelwahab","doi":"10.1080/20905998.2024.2398378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to assess the stone free rate of flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy (FURL) in upper urinary tract stones (UUTS) >20 mm and the risk of complications from ureteral access sheath (UAS) usage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective randomized clinical trial that included patients with UUTS larger than 20 mm who underwent FURL after randomization into two groups: group A (UAS) and group B (non-UAS). Data were collected for patients' demographics, stone parameters, operative and postoperative complications, and the outcome of FURL regarding stone-free rate (SFR) and perioperative complications, with a 6-month follow-up. Stone clearance was defined as the absence of fragments or the presence of fragments smaller than 2 mm on follow-up CT scans of the urinary tract (CTUT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and fifty-nine patients were evaluated. The mean stone size was 27.08 ± 6.185 mm. Complete stone-free status was achieved in 84.9% of the patients. No significant difference was detected between both groups regarding operative time or SFR. The ureteric injury was identified in 13 (8.1%) patients (10 in group A and 3 in group B, p: 0.0481). Five of them, from group A, revealed hydronephrosis after stent removal. Postoperative pain and fever were documented in 50 and 22 patients, respectively, without significant differences between both groups. Postoperative sepsis occurred in 7 patients (2 in group A, 5 in group B, p: 0.380) who required supportive care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FURL without UAS is a safe and efficient treatment for upper urinary tract stones larger than 20 mm in the form of lower risk of ureteric injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":8113,"journal":{"name":"Arab Journal of Urology","volume":"23 1","pages":"62-69"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11703511/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy of flexible ureteroscopy for large volume stones and hazards of ureteral access sheath usage: A prospective randomized study.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed M Rammah, Farouk Khaled, Samih Zamel, Amr Elkady, Samer Morsy, Mohamed Abdelwahab\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20905998.2024.2398378\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to assess the stone free rate of flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy (FURL) in upper urinary tract stones (UUTS) >20 mm and the risk of complications from ureteral access sheath (UAS) usage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective randomized clinical trial that included patients with UUTS larger than 20 mm who underwent FURL after randomization into two groups: group A (UAS) and group B (non-UAS). Data were collected for patients' demographics, stone parameters, operative and postoperative complications, and the outcome of FURL regarding stone-free rate (SFR) and perioperative complications, with a 6-month follow-up. Stone clearance was defined as the absence of fragments or the presence of fragments smaller than 2 mm on follow-up CT scans of the urinary tract (CTUT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and fifty-nine patients were evaluated. The mean stone size was 27.08 ± 6.185 mm. Complete stone-free status was achieved in 84.9% of the patients. No significant difference was detected between both groups regarding operative time or SFR. The ureteric injury was identified in 13 (8.1%) patients (10 in group A and 3 in group B, p: 0.0481). Five of them, from group A, revealed hydronephrosis after stent removal. Postoperative pain and fever were documented in 50 and 22 patients, respectively, without significant differences between both groups. Postoperative sepsis occurred in 7 patients (2 in group A, 5 in group B, p: 0.380) who required supportive care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FURL without UAS is a safe and efficient treatment for upper urinary tract stones larger than 20 mm in the form of lower risk of ureteric injury.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arab Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"62-69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11703511/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arab Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20905998.2024.2398378\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arab Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20905998.2024.2398378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们旨在评估输尿管软镜和激光碎石术(FURL)治疗上尿路结石(UUTS)的去除率和输尿管通路鞘(UAS)的并发症风险。方法:这是一项前瞻性随机临床试验,纳入了UUTS大于20 mm的患者,随机分为两组:a组(UAS)和B组(非UAS)。收集患者的人口统计学数据、结石参数、手术和术后并发症,以及FURL关于结石无结石率(SFR)和围手术期并发症的结果,随访6个月。结石清除定义为在随访的尿路CT扫描(CTUT)中没有碎片或存在小于2mm的碎片。结果:对159例患者进行了评估。平均结石大小为27.08±6.185 mm。84.9%的患者达到完全无结石状态。两组在手术时间和SFR方面无显著差异。输尿管损伤13例(8.1%)(A组10例,B组3例,p: 0.0481)。A组5例患者支架取出后出现肾积水。术后疼痛和发热分别记录在50例和22例患者中,两组之间无显著差异。术后发生脓毒症7例(A组2例,B组5例,p: 0.380),需要支持治疗。结论:fu + UAS治疗大于20mm的上尿路结石安全有效,且输尿管损伤风险低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The efficacy of flexible ureteroscopy for large volume stones and hazards of ureteral access sheath usage: A prospective randomized study.

Objectives: We aimed to assess the stone free rate of flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy (FURL) in upper urinary tract stones (UUTS) >20 mm and the risk of complications from ureteral access sheath (UAS) usage.

Methods: This is a prospective randomized clinical trial that included patients with UUTS larger than 20 mm who underwent FURL after randomization into two groups: group A (UAS) and group B (non-UAS). Data were collected for patients' demographics, stone parameters, operative and postoperative complications, and the outcome of FURL regarding stone-free rate (SFR) and perioperative complications, with a 6-month follow-up. Stone clearance was defined as the absence of fragments or the presence of fragments smaller than 2 mm on follow-up CT scans of the urinary tract (CTUT).

Results: One hundred and fifty-nine patients were evaluated. The mean stone size was 27.08 ± 6.185 mm. Complete stone-free status was achieved in 84.9% of the patients. No significant difference was detected between both groups regarding operative time or SFR. The ureteric injury was identified in 13 (8.1%) patients (10 in group A and 3 in group B, p: 0.0481). Five of them, from group A, revealed hydronephrosis after stent removal. Postoperative pain and fever were documented in 50 and 22 patients, respectively, without significant differences between both groups. Postoperative sepsis occurred in 7 patients (2 in group A, 5 in group B, p: 0.380) who required supportive care.

Conclusion: FURL without UAS is a safe and efficient treatment for upper urinary tract stones larger than 20 mm in the form of lower risk of ureteric injury.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arab Journal of Urology
Arab Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Arab Journal of Urology is a peer-reviewed journal that strives to provide a high standard of research and clinical material to the widest possible urological community worldwide. The journal encompasses all aspects of urology including: urological oncology, urological reconstructive surgery, urodynamics, female urology, pediatric urology, endourology, transplantation, erectile dysfunction, and urinary infections and inflammations. The journal provides reviews, original articles, editorials, surgical techniques, cases reports and correspondence. Urologists, oncologists, pathologists, radiologists and scientists are invited to submit their contributions to make the Arab Journal of Urology a viable international forum for the practical, timely and state-of-the-art clinical urology and basic urological research.
期刊最新文献
Correction. Prophylactic direct oral anticoagulants vs. low molecular weight heparin after urological surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Varicocele repair for severe oligoasthenoteratozoospermia: Scoping review of published guidelines, and systematic review of the literature. The efficacy of flexible ureteroscopy for large volume stones and hazards of ureteral access sheath usage: A prospective randomized study. Acupuncture therapy of overactive bladder: An umbrella review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1