Youcheng Shen, Changpei Liu, Zhijiang Liu, Wei Zhang, Jidong Rong, Ning Gu, Changyin Shen, Panke Chen, Chancui Deng, Xi Wang, Shuangya Yang, Qianhang Xia, Guanxue Xu, Bei Shi
{"title":"局灶型支架内再狭窄的体内预测因素:临床、血管造影和光学相干断层扫描研究。","authors":"Youcheng Shen, Changpei Liu, Zhijiang Liu, Wei Zhang, Jidong Rong, Ning Gu, Changyin Shen, Panke Chen, Chancui Deng, Xi Wang, Shuangya Yang, Qianhang Xia, Guanxue Xu, Bei Shi","doi":"10.1159/000542165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction:Few studies have evaluated different patterns of in-stent restenosis by optical coherence tomography (OCT). This study aims to identify in vivo predictors for focal restenosis in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR). Methods: The study recruited patients with ISR who underwent OCT examination in the Cardiology Department of the Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University from October 2018 to December 2022. Based on the angiographic classification of ISR lesions, the patients were divided into two groups: the focal group (n=58) and the non-focal group (n=158). Results: The white blood cell count was higher in the non-focal group than those in focal type (7.8±3.0 vs. 6.6±2.1, P = 0.007). The prevalence of lipid rich plaque was higher in patients with focal ISR (65.5% vs. 42.4%, P = 0.003). The occurrence of red thrombus (27.8% vs. 12.1%, P = 0.016) and white thrombus (41.1% vs. 24.1%, P = 0.021) was higher in the non-focal group. Multivariate analysis showed that low density lipoprotein cholesterol C (odds ratio [OR]:3.341, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.714-9.784, P = 0.046) was independently associated with focal restenosis. While white blood cell count (OR: 0.814, 95% CI: 0.657-0.913, P = 0.047) and stent malapposition (OR: 0.228, 95% CI: 0.057-0.896, P = 0.037) were independently associated with non-focal restenosis. Conclusion:There were significant differences in clinical baselines and OCT identified morphological characteristics in patients between focal and non-focal group. Low density lipoprotein cholesterol C was independent associated with focal restenosis. White blood cell count and stent malapposition were correlated with non-focal restenosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9391,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In vivo Predictors of Focal Type In-stent Restenosis: A Clinical, Angiographical and Optical Coherence Tomography Study.\",\"authors\":\"Youcheng Shen, Changpei Liu, Zhijiang Liu, Wei Zhang, Jidong Rong, Ning Gu, Changyin Shen, Panke Chen, Chancui Deng, Xi Wang, Shuangya Yang, Qianhang Xia, Guanxue Xu, Bei Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000542165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Introduction:Few studies have evaluated different patterns of in-stent restenosis by optical coherence tomography (OCT). This study aims to identify in vivo predictors for focal restenosis in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR). Methods: The study recruited patients with ISR who underwent OCT examination in the Cardiology Department of the Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University from October 2018 to December 2022. Based on the angiographic classification of ISR lesions, the patients were divided into two groups: the focal group (n=58) and the non-focal group (n=158). Results: The white blood cell count was higher in the non-focal group than those in focal type (7.8±3.0 vs. 6.6±2.1, P = 0.007). The prevalence of lipid rich plaque was higher in patients with focal ISR (65.5% vs. 42.4%, P = 0.003). The occurrence of red thrombus (27.8% vs. 12.1%, P = 0.016) and white thrombus (41.1% vs. 24.1%, P = 0.021) was higher in the non-focal group. Multivariate analysis showed that low density lipoprotein cholesterol C (odds ratio [OR]:3.341, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.714-9.784, P = 0.046) was independently associated with focal restenosis. While white blood cell count (OR: 0.814, 95% CI: 0.657-0.913, P = 0.047) and stent malapposition (OR: 0.228, 95% CI: 0.057-0.896, P = 0.037) were independently associated with non-focal restenosis. Conclusion:There were significant differences in clinical baselines and OCT identified morphological characteristics in patients between focal and non-focal group. Low density lipoprotein cholesterol C was independent associated with focal restenosis. White blood cell count and stent malapposition were correlated with non-focal restenosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542165\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542165","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
很少有研究通过光学相干断层扫描(OCT)评估不同类型的支架内再狭窄。本研究旨在确定支架内再狭窄(ISR)患者局灶性再狭窄的体内预测因素。方法:研究招募2018年10月至2022年12月在遵义医科大学附属医院心内科行OCT检查的ISR患者。根据ISR病变的血管造影分类,将患者分为局灶组(n=58)和非局灶组(n=158)。结果:非灶性组白细胞计数高于灶性组(7.8±3.0 vs. 6.6±2.1,P = 0.007)。局灶性ISR患者的富脂斑块患病率更高(65.5%比42.4%,P = 0.003)。非病灶组红色血栓(27.8%比12.1%,P = 0.016)和白色血栓(41.1%比24.1%,P = 0.021)发生率较高。多因素分析显示,低密度脂蛋白胆固醇C(优势比[OR]:3.341, 95%可信区间[CI]: 1.714-9.784, P = 0.046)与局灶性再狭窄独立相关。而白细胞计数(OR: 0.814, 95% CI: 0.657-0.913, P = 0.047)和支架错位(OR: 0.228, 95% CI: 0.057-0.896, P = 0.037)与非局灶性再狭窄独立相关。结论:局灶组和非局灶组患者的临床基线和OCT识别形态学特征存在显著差异。低密度脂蛋白胆固醇C与局灶性再狭窄无关。白细胞计数和支架错位与非局灶性再狭窄相关。
In vivo Predictors of Focal Type In-stent Restenosis: A Clinical, Angiographical and Optical Coherence Tomography Study.
Introduction:Few studies have evaluated different patterns of in-stent restenosis by optical coherence tomography (OCT). This study aims to identify in vivo predictors for focal restenosis in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR). Methods: The study recruited patients with ISR who underwent OCT examination in the Cardiology Department of the Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University from October 2018 to December 2022. Based on the angiographic classification of ISR lesions, the patients were divided into two groups: the focal group (n=58) and the non-focal group (n=158). Results: The white blood cell count was higher in the non-focal group than those in focal type (7.8±3.0 vs. 6.6±2.1, P = 0.007). The prevalence of lipid rich plaque was higher in patients with focal ISR (65.5% vs. 42.4%, P = 0.003). The occurrence of red thrombus (27.8% vs. 12.1%, P = 0.016) and white thrombus (41.1% vs. 24.1%, P = 0.021) was higher in the non-focal group. Multivariate analysis showed that low density lipoprotein cholesterol C (odds ratio [OR]:3.341, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.714-9.784, P = 0.046) was independently associated with focal restenosis. While white blood cell count (OR: 0.814, 95% CI: 0.657-0.913, P = 0.047) and stent malapposition (OR: 0.228, 95% CI: 0.057-0.896, P = 0.037) were independently associated with non-focal restenosis. Conclusion:There were significant differences in clinical baselines and OCT identified morphological characteristics in patients between focal and non-focal group. Low density lipoprotein cholesterol C was independent associated with focal restenosis. White blood cell count and stent malapposition were correlated with non-focal restenosis.
期刊介绍:
''Cardiology'' features first reports on original clinical, preclinical and fundamental research as well as ''Novel Insights from Clinical Experience'' and topical comprehensive reviews in selected areas of cardiovascular disease. ''Editorial Comments'' provide a critical but positive evaluation of a recent article. Papers not only describe but offer critical appraisals of new developments in non-invasive and invasive diagnostic methods and in pharmacologic, nutritional and mechanical/surgical therapies. Readers are thus kept informed of current strategies in the prevention, recognition and treatment of heart disease. Special sections in a variety of subspecialty areas reinforce the journal''s value as a complete record of recent progress for all cardiologists, internists, cardiac surgeons, clinical physiologists, pharmacologists and professionals in other areas of medicine interested in current activity in cardiovascular diseases.