自身免疫诊断在过去10年的发展:从英国NEQAS外部质量评估EQA项目中吸取的经验教训

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1515/cclm-2024-0781
Emirena Garrafa, Teresa Carbone, Maria Infantino, Pierluigi Anzivino, Michela Boni, Sara Ghisellini, Valentina Muraro, Daniele Roselli, Maria Teresa Trevisan, Dina Patel, Nicola Bizzaro
{"title":"自身免疫诊断在过去10年的发展:从英国NEQAS外部质量评估EQA项目中吸取的经验教训","authors":"Emirena Garrafa, Teresa Carbone, Maria Infantino, Pierluigi Anzivino, Michela Boni, Sara Ghisellini, Valentina Muraro, Daniele Roselli, Maria Teresa Trevisan, Dina Patel, Nicola Bizzaro","doi":"10.1515/cclm-2024-0781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>External quality assessment (EQA) programs play a pivotal role in harmonizing laboratory practices, offering users a benchmark system to evaluate their own performance and identify areas requiring improvement. The objective of this study was to go through and analyze the UK NEQAS \"Immunology, Immunochemistry and Allergy\" EQA reports between 2012 and 2021 to assess the overall level of harmonization in autoimmune diagnostics and identify areas requiring improvement for future actions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The EQA programs reviewed included anti-nuclear (ANA), anti-dsDNA, anti-centromere, anti-extractable nuclear antigen (ENA), anti-phospholipids, anti-neutrophil cytoplasm (ANCA), anti-proteinase 3 (PR3), anti-myeloperoxidase (MPO), anti-glomerular basement membrane (GBM), rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA), mitochondrial (AMA), liver-kidney-microsomal (LKM), smooth muscle (ASMA), APCA, and celiac disease antibodies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the analyzed period, the number in participating laboratories showed an increase for almost all programs. Among solid phase methods, the use of ELISA techniques showed a progressive reduction, while new technologies, such as the fluoroenzymatic immunoassay, chemiluminescence immunoassay, Luminex and immunoblot showed an increased number of users. The number of results complying with the expected negative or positive target slightly increased for almost all antibodies in the last decade. A description of the most frequent causes of mistakes or misinterpretation for each specific test and method is also provided in this study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although numerous challenges need to be addressed in the area of autoantibody detection to enhance testing quality and attain higher harmonization, the period analyzed revealed that the ever-expanding range of autoantibodies, coupled with the introduction of new tests and methodologies and the advent of automated platforms, has brought about significant changes in autoimmune diagnostics.</p>","PeriodicalId":10390,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evolution of autoimmune diagnostics over the past 10 years: lessons learned from the UK NEQAS external quality assessment EQA programs.\",\"authors\":\"Emirena Garrafa, Teresa Carbone, Maria Infantino, Pierluigi Anzivino, Michela Boni, Sara Ghisellini, Valentina Muraro, Daniele Roselli, Maria Teresa Trevisan, Dina Patel, Nicola Bizzaro\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/cclm-2024-0781\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>External quality assessment (EQA) programs play a pivotal role in harmonizing laboratory practices, offering users a benchmark system to evaluate their own performance and identify areas requiring improvement. The objective of this study was to go through and analyze the UK NEQAS \\\"Immunology, Immunochemistry and Allergy\\\" EQA reports between 2012 and 2021 to assess the overall level of harmonization in autoimmune diagnostics and identify areas requiring improvement for future actions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The EQA programs reviewed included anti-nuclear (ANA), anti-dsDNA, anti-centromere, anti-extractable nuclear antigen (ENA), anti-phospholipids, anti-neutrophil cytoplasm (ANCA), anti-proteinase 3 (PR3), anti-myeloperoxidase (MPO), anti-glomerular basement membrane (GBM), rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA), mitochondrial (AMA), liver-kidney-microsomal (LKM), smooth muscle (ASMA), APCA, and celiac disease antibodies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the analyzed period, the number in participating laboratories showed an increase for almost all programs. Among solid phase methods, the use of ELISA techniques showed a progressive reduction, while new technologies, such as the fluoroenzymatic immunoassay, chemiluminescence immunoassay, Luminex and immunoblot showed an increased number of users. The number of results complying with the expected negative or positive target slightly increased for almost all antibodies in the last decade. A description of the most frequent causes of mistakes or misinterpretation for each specific test and method is also provided in this study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although numerous challenges need to be addressed in the area of autoantibody detection to enhance testing quality and attain higher harmonization, the period analyzed revealed that the ever-expanding range of autoantibodies, coupled with the introduction of new tests and methodologies and the advent of automated platforms, has brought about significant changes in autoimmune diagnostics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2024-0781\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2024-0781","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:外部质量评估(EQA)项目在协调实验室实践方面发挥着关键作用,为用户提供了一个基准系统来评估他们自己的表现并确定需要改进的领域。本研究的目的是通过分析2012年至2021年英国NEQAS“免疫学、免疫化学和过敏”EQA报告,评估自身免疫诊断的整体协调水平,并确定未来行动需要改进的领域。方法:EQA项目包括抗核(ANA)、抗dsdna、抗着丝粒、抗可提取核抗原(ENA)、抗磷脂、抗中性粒细胞细胞质(ANCA)、抗蛋白酶3 (PR3)、抗髓过氧化物酶(MPO)、抗肾小球基底膜(GBM)、类风湿因子(RF)、抗瓜氨酸化蛋白抗体(ACPA)、线粒体(AMA)、肝-肾-微粒体(LKM)、平滑肌(ASMA)、APCA和乳糜泻抗体。结果:在分析期内,几乎所有项目参与实验室的数量都有所增加。在固相法中,ELISA技术的使用逐渐减少,而氟酶免疫测定、化学发光免疫测定、Luminex和免疫印迹等新技术的使用数量增加。在过去十年中,几乎所有抗体的检测结果都符合预期的阴性或阳性目标,略有增加。本研究还提供了每个特定测试和方法中最常见的错误或误解原因的描述。结论:尽管在自身抗体检测领域需要解决许多挑战,以提高检测质量并实现更高的一致性,但所分析的时期显示,自身抗体范围的不断扩大,加上新测试和方法的引入以及自动化平台的出现,给自身免疫诊断带来了重大变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evolution of autoimmune diagnostics over the past 10 years: lessons learned from the UK NEQAS external quality assessment EQA programs.

Objectives: External quality assessment (EQA) programs play a pivotal role in harmonizing laboratory practices, offering users a benchmark system to evaluate their own performance and identify areas requiring improvement. The objective of this study was to go through and analyze the UK NEQAS "Immunology, Immunochemistry and Allergy" EQA reports between 2012 and 2021 to assess the overall level of harmonization in autoimmune diagnostics and identify areas requiring improvement for future actions.

Methods: The EQA programs reviewed included anti-nuclear (ANA), anti-dsDNA, anti-centromere, anti-extractable nuclear antigen (ENA), anti-phospholipids, anti-neutrophil cytoplasm (ANCA), anti-proteinase 3 (PR3), anti-myeloperoxidase (MPO), anti-glomerular basement membrane (GBM), rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA), mitochondrial (AMA), liver-kidney-microsomal (LKM), smooth muscle (ASMA), APCA, and celiac disease antibodies.

Results: In the analyzed period, the number in participating laboratories showed an increase for almost all programs. Among solid phase methods, the use of ELISA techniques showed a progressive reduction, while new technologies, such as the fluoroenzymatic immunoassay, chemiluminescence immunoassay, Luminex and immunoblot showed an increased number of users. The number of results complying with the expected negative or positive target slightly increased for almost all antibodies in the last decade. A description of the most frequent causes of mistakes or misinterpretation for each specific test and method is also provided in this study.

Conclusions: Although numerous challenges need to be addressed in the area of autoantibody detection to enhance testing quality and attain higher harmonization, the period analyzed revealed that the ever-expanding range of autoantibodies, coupled with the introduction of new tests and methodologies and the advent of automated platforms, has brought about significant changes in autoimmune diagnostics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
16.20%
发文量
306
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) publishes articles on novel teaching and training methods applicable to laboratory medicine. CCLM welcomes contributions on the progress in fundamental and applied research and cutting-edge clinical laboratory medicine. It is one of the leading journals in the field, with an impact factor over 3. CCLM is issued monthly, and it is published in print and electronically. CCLM is the official journal of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and publishes regularly EFLM recommendations and news. CCLM is the official journal of the National Societies from Austria (ÖGLMKC); Belgium (RBSLM); Germany (DGKL); Hungary (MLDT); Ireland (ACBI); Italy (SIBioC); Portugal (SPML); and Slovenia (SZKK); and it is affiliated to AACB (Australia) and SFBC (France). Topics: - clinical biochemistry - clinical genomics and molecular biology - clinical haematology and coagulation - clinical immunology and autoimmunity - clinical microbiology - drug monitoring and analysis - evaluation of diagnostic biomarkers - disease-oriented topics (cardiovascular disease, cancer diagnostics, diabetes) - new reagents, instrumentation and technologies - new methodologies - reference materials and methods - reference values and decision limits - quality and safety in laboratory medicine - translational laboratory medicine - clinical metrology Follow @cclm_degruyter on Twitter!
期刊最新文献
Reviewer Acknowledgment. Evaluation of AUTION EYE AI-4510 flow cell morphology analyzer for counting particles in urine. Biological variation of cardiac biomarkers in athletes during an entire sport season. From errors to excellence: the pre-analytical journey to improved quality in diagnostics. A scoping review. The journey to pre-analytical quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1