氟吡喃醌和氰氨酰胺对两种新热带无刺蜜蜂的致死和亚致死效应。

IF 2.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Ecotoxicology Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1007/s10646-024-02848-7
Cristian Góngora-Gamboa, Esaú Ruiz-Sánchez, Roberto Zamora-Bustillos, Emanuel Hernández-Núñez, Horacio Ballina-Gómez
{"title":"氟吡喃醌和氰氨酰胺对两种新热带无刺蜜蜂的致死和亚致死效应。","authors":"Cristian Góngora-Gamboa, Esaú Ruiz-Sánchez, Roberto Zamora-Bustillos, Emanuel Hernández-Núñez, Horacio Ballina-Gómez","doi":"10.1007/s10646-024-02848-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stingless bees are important pollinators in tropical regions, but their survival and behavior have been impacted by various factors, including exposure to insecticides. Here, we evaluated the lethal and sublethal effects of commercial formulations of two widely used insecticides, flupyradifurone (FPF formulation), and cyantraniliprole (CY formulation), on Melipona beecheii and Nannotrigona perilampoides. The study involved oral exposure of bees to insecticides, calculation of the lethal concentration (LC<sub>50</sub>) and the lethal time (LT<sub>50</sub>), and evaluation of walking and flight take-off activities. The LC<sub>50</sub> values showed that the largest bee, M. beecheii, was more sensitive than N. perilampoides to both insecticides and that the FPF formulation had faster lethal effects in both species (N. perilampoides, 9.6 h; M. beecheii, 5 h) compared to the effects of the CY formulation (N. perilampoides, 17 h; M. beecheii, 24.7 h). Sublethal concentrations (LC<sub>50/10</sub> and LC<sub>50/100</sub>) of both insecticides affected walking and flight take-off activities. After 6-24 h of exposure, both FPF and CY formulations significantly reduced the mean walking speed of N. perilampoides (0.962-1.402 cm/s) and M. beecheii (2.026-2.589 cm/s) compared to the control groups (N. perilampoides: 1.648-1.941 cm/s; M. beecheii: 2.759-3.471 cm/s). Additionally, the FPF and the CY formulation impaired individual flight take-off in both species. This study provides the first comprehensive evaluation of the lethal and sublethal effects of flupyradifurone and cyantraniliprole on M. beecheii and N. perilampoides, offering valuable information for future research on insecticide toxicity in stingless bees.</p>","PeriodicalId":11497,"journal":{"name":"Ecotoxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lethal and sublethal effects of flupyradifurone and cyantraniliprole on two neotropical stingless bee species.\",\"authors\":\"Cristian Góngora-Gamboa, Esaú Ruiz-Sánchez, Roberto Zamora-Bustillos, Emanuel Hernández-Núñez, Horacio Ballina-Gómez\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10646-024-02848-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Stingless bees are important pollinators in tropical regions, but their survival and behavior have been impacted by various factors, including exposure to insecticides. Here, we evaluated the lethal and sublethal effects of commercial formulations of two widely used insecticides, flupyradifurone (FPF formulation), and cyantraniliprole (CY formulation), on Melipona beecheii and Nannotrigona perilampoides. The study involved oral exposure of bees to insecticides, calculation of the lethal concentration (LC<sub>50</sub>) and the lethal time (LT<sub>50</sub>), and evaluation of walking and flight take-off activities. The LC<sub>50</sub> values showed that the largest bee, M. beecheii, was more sensitive than N. perilampoides to both insecticides and that the FPF formulation had faster lethal effects in both species (N. perilampoides, 9.6 h; M. beecheii, 5 h) compared to the effects of the CY formulation (N. perilampoides, 17 h; M. beecheii, 24.7 h). Sublethal concentrations (LC<sub>50/10</sub> and LC<sub>50/100</sub>) of both insecticides affected walking and flight take-off activities. After 6-24 h of exposure, both FPF and CY formulations significantly reduced the mean walking speed of N. perilampoides (0.962-1.402 cm/s) and M. beecheii (2.026-2.589 cm/s) compared to the control groups (N. perilampoides: 1.648-1.941 cm/s; M. beecheii: 2.759-3.471 cm/s). Additionally, the FPF and the CY formulation impaired individual flight take-off in both species. This study provides the first comprehensive evaluation of the lethal and sublethal effects of flupyradifurone and cyantraniliprole on M. beecheii and N. perilampoides, offering valuable information for future research on insecticide toxicity in stingless bees.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecotoxicology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecotoxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-024-02848-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecotoxicology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-024-02848-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无刺蜜蜂是热带地区重要的传粉者,但它们的生存和行为受到多种因素的影响,包括杀虫剂的暴露。在这里,我们评估了两种广泛使用的杀虫剂,氟吡喃醌(FPF制剂)和氰虫腈(CY制剂)的商业配方对山毛榉和扁蝽的致死和亚致死效果。研究包括蜜蜂口服杀虫剂,计算致死浓度(LC50)和致死时间(LT50),以及评估行走和起飞活动。LC50值表明,最大的蜜蜂毛毛小蜂对这两种杀虫剂的敏感性均高于大蜂,且ffp制剂对两种蜜蜂的致死作用更快(大蜂9.6 h;山毛榉,5 h)与CY制剂(山毛榉,17 h;M. beecheii, 24.7 h)。两种杀虫剂的亚致死浓度(LC50/10和LC50/100)均影响果蝇的行走和起飞活动。暴露6 ~ 24 h后,与对照组(水草:1.648 ~ 1.941 cm/s;山毛榉:2.026 ~ 2.589 cm/s)相比,ffp和CY均显著降低了水草的平均行走速度(0.962 ~ 1.402 cm/s)和山毛榉(2.026 ~ 2.589 cm/s);山毛榉:2.759-3.471 cm/s)。此外,FPF和CY配方损害了两个物种的个体飞行起飞。本研究首次全面评价了氟吡喃醌和氰氨酰胺对无刺蜜蜂的致死和亚致死效应,为今后杀虫剂对无刺蜜蜂的毒性研究提供了有价值的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lethal and sublethal effects of flupyradifurone and cyantraniliprole on two neotropical stingless bee species.

Stingless bees are important pollinators in tropical regions, but their survival and behavior have been impacted by various factors, including exposure to insecticides. Here, we evaluated the lethal and sublethal effects of commercial formulations of two widely used insecticides, flupyradifurone (FPF formulation), and cyantraniliprole (CY formulation), on Melipona beecheii and Nannotrigona perilampoides. The study involved oral exposure of bees to insecticides, calculation of the lethal concentration (LC50) and the lethal time (LT50), and evaluation of walking and flight take-off activities. The LC50 values showed that the largest bee, M. beecheii, was more sensitive than N. perilampoides to both insecticides and that the FPF formulation had faster lethal effects in both species (N. perilampoides, 9.6 h; M. beecheii, 5 h) compared to the effects of the CY formulation (N. perilampoides, 17 h; M. beecheii, 24.7 h). Sublethal concentrations (LC50/10 and LC50/100) of both insecticides affected walking and flight take-off activities. After 6-24 h of exposure, both FPF and CY formulations significantly reduced the mean walking speed of N. perilampoides (0.962-1.402 cm/s) and M. beecheii (2.026-2.589 cm/s) compared to the control groups (N. perilampoides: 1.648-1.941 cm/s; M. beecheii: 2.759-3.471 cm/s). Additionally, the FPF and the CY formulation impaired individual flight take-off in both species. This study provides the first comprehensive evaluation of the lethal and sublethal effects of flupyradifurone and cyantraniliprole on M. beecheii and N. perilampoides, offering valuable information for future research on insecticide toxicity in stingless bees.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecotoxicology
Ecotoxicology 环境科学-毒理学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: Ecotoxicology is an international journal devoted to the publication of fundamental research on the effects of toxic chemicals on populations, communities and terrestrial, freshwater and marine ecosystems. It aims to elucidate mechanisms and processes whereby chemicals exert their effects on ecosystems and the impact caused at the population or community level. The journal is not biased with respect to taxon or biome, and papers that indicate possible new approaches to regulation and control of toxic chemicals and those aiding in formulating ways of conserving threatened species are particularly welcome. Studies on individuals should demonstrate linkage to population effects in clear and quantitative ways. Laboratory studies must show a clear linkage to specific field situations. The journal includes not only original research papers but technical notes and review articles, both invited and submitted. A strong, broadly based editorial board ensures as wide an international coverage as possible.
期刊最新文献
Subchronic exposure to nonylphenol ethoxylate (NPE) induces cardiotoxicity and oxidative stress in American bullfrog tadpoles: a mechanistic approach. Mechanisms of calcium-induced protection against lead toxicity in Ulmus umbraculifera L.: a physiological and biochemical perspective. Synergistic effects of elevated temperature with pesticides on reproduction, development and survival of dung beetles. Ecotoxicological effects of a glyphosate-based herbicide on Gryllus (Gryllus) assimilis (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) ontogeny: a study on antioxidant system, oxidative stress and cholinergic system. Contrasting behavioural responses to concurrent stressors in an aquatic snail: the importance of stress type and combination.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1