超越受控环境的幻觉:如何在研究中拥抱生态相关性?

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES European Journal of Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1111/ejn.16661
Cassandre Vielle
{"title":"超越受控环境的幻觉:如何在研究中拥抱生态相关性?","authors":"Cassandre Vielle","doi":"10.1111/ejn.16661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Through the lens of preclinical research on substance use disorders (SUD), I propose a reflection aimed at re-evaluating animal models in neuroscience, with a focus on ecological relevance. While rodent models have provided valuable insights into the neurobiology of SUD, the field currently faces a validation crisis, with findings often failing to translate into effective human treatments. Originally designed to address the lack of reproducibility in animal studies, the current global gold standard of rigorous standardization has led to increasingly controlled environments. This growing disconnection between laboratory settings and real-world scenarios exacerbates the validation crisis. Rodent models have also revealed various environmental influences on drug use and its neural mechanisms, highlighting parallels with human behaviour and underscoring the importance of ecological relevance in behavioural research. Drawing inspiration from inquiries in ethology and evolutionary biology, I advocate for incorporating greater environmental complexity into animal models. In line with this idea, the neuroethological approach involves studying spontaneous behaviours in seminatural habitats while utilizing advanced technologies to monitor neural activity. Although this framework offers new insights into human neuroscience, it does not adequately capture the complex human conditions that lead to neuropsychiatric diseases. Therefore, preclinical research should prioritize understanding the environmental factors that shape human behaviour and neural architecture, integrating these insights into animal models. By emphasizing ecological relevance, we can achieve deeper insights into neuropsychiatric disorders and develop more effective treatment strategies. This approach highlights significant benefits for both scientific inquiry and ethical considerations. The controlled environment is a chimera; it is time to rethink our models. Here, I have chosen the prism of preclinical research on SUD to present, in a nonexhaustive manner, advances enabled by the use of rodent models, the crises faced by animal experimentation, the reflections and responses provided by laboratories, to finally propose rethinking our models around questions of ecological relevance, in order to improve both ethics and scientific quality. Although my discussion is illustrated by the situation in preclinical research on SUD, the observation drawn from it and the proposals made can extend to many other domains and species.</p>","PeriodicalId":11993,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"61 1","pages":"e16661"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond the Illusion of Controlled Environments: How to Embrace Ecological Pertinence in Research?\",\"authors\":\"Cassandre Vielle\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ejn.16661\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Through the lens of preclinical research on substance use disorders (SUD), I propose a reflection aimed at re-evaluating animal models in neuroscience, with a focus on ecological relevance. While rodent models have provided valuable insights into the neurobiology of SUD, the field currently faces a validation crisis, with findings often failing to translate into effective human treatments. Originally designed to address the lack of reproducibility in animal studies, the current global gold standard of rigorous standardization has led to increasingly controlled environments. This growing disconnection between laboratory settings and real-world scenarios exacerbates the validation crisis. Rodent models have also revealed various environmental influences on drug use and its neural mechanisms, highlighting parallels with human behaviour and underscoring the importance of ecological relevance in behavioural research. Drawing inspiration from inquiries in ethology and evolutionary biology, I advocate for incorporating greater environmental complexity into animal models. In line with this idea, the neuroethological approach involves studying spontaneous behaviours in seminatural habitats while utilizing advanced technologies to monitor neural activity. Although this framework offers new insights into human neuroscience, it does not adequately capture the complex human conditions that lead to neuropsychiatric diseases. Therefore, preclinical research should prioritize understanding the environmental factors that shape human behaviour and neural architecture, integrating these insights into animal models. By emphasizing ecological relevance, we can achieve deeper insights into neuropsychiatric disorders and develop more effective treatment strategies. This approach highlights significant benefits for both scientific inquiry and ethical considerations. The controlled environment is a chimera; it is time to rethink our models. Here, I have chosen the prism of preclinical research on SUD to present, in a nonexhaustive manner, advances enabled by the use of rodent models, the crises faced by animal experimentation, the reflections and responses provided by laboratories, to finally propose rethinking our models around questions of ecological relevance, in order to improve both ethics and scientific quality. Although my discussion is illustrated by the situation in preclinical research on SUD, the observation drawn from it and the proposals made can extend to many other domains and species.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"e16661\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.16661\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.16661","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过对物质使用障碍(SUD)的临床前研究的镜头,我提出了一个反思,旨在重新评估神经科学中的动物模型,重点是生态相关性。虽然啮齿动物模型为SUD的神经生物学提供了有价值的见解,但该领域目前面临着验证危机,研究结果往往无法转化为有效的人类治疗方法。最初的设计是为了解决动物研究中缺乏可重复性的问题,目前全球严格标准化的黄金标准导致了越来越多的控制环境。实验室设置和现实世界场景之间日益增长的脱节加剧了验证危机。啮齿类动物模型也揭示了各种环境对药物使用及其神经机制的影响,突出了与人类行为的相似之处,并强调了行为研究中生态相关性的重要性。从动物行为学和进化生物学的研究中获得灵感,我主张将更大的环境复杂性纳入动物模型。与此想法一致,神经行为学方法包括研究半自然栖息地的自发行为,同时利用先进技术监测神经活动。尽管这一框架为人类神经科学提供了新的见解,但它并没有充分捕捉到导致神经精神疾病的复杂人类状况。因此,临床前研究应优先理解影响人类行为和神经结构的环境因素,并将这些见解整合到动物模型中。通过强调生态相关性,我们可以更深入地了解神经精神疾病,并制定更有效的治疗策略。这种方法对科学探究和伦理考虑都有显著的好处。受控环境是一种幻想;是时候重新思考我们的模式了。在这里,我选择了SUD临床前研究的棱镜,以一种不详尽的方式,通过使用啮齿动物模型实现的进步,动物实验面临的危机,实验室提供的反思和回应,最后提出围绕生态相关问题重新思考我们的模型,以提高伦理和科学质量。虽然我的讨论是通过临床前研究SUD的情况来说明的,但从中得出的观察和提出的建议可以扩展到许多其他领域和物种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Beyond the Illusion of Controlled Environments: How to Embrace Ecological Pertinence in Research?

Through the lens of preclinical research on substance use disorders (SUD), I propose a reflection aimed at re-evaluating animal models in neuroscience, with a focus on ecological relevance. While rodent models have provided valuable insights into the neurobiology of SUD, the field currently faces a validation crisis, with findings often failing to translate into effective human treatments. Originally designed to address the lack of reproducibility in animal studies, the current global gold standard of rigorous standardization has led to increasingly controlled environments. This growing disconnection between laboratory settings and real-world scenarios exacerbates the validation crisis. Rodent models have also revealed various environmental influences on drug use and its neural mechanisms, highlighting parallels with human behaviour and underscoring the importance of ecological relevance in behavioural research. Drawing inspiration from inquiries in ethology and evolutionary biology, I advocate for incorporating greater environmental complexity into animal models. In line with this idea, the neuroethological approach involves studying spontaneous behaviours in seminatural habitats while utilizing advanced technologies to monitor neural activity. Although this framework offers new insights into human neuroscience, it does not adequately capture the complex human conditions that lead to neuropsychiatric diseases. Therefore, preclinical research should prioritize understanding the environmental factors that shape human behaviour and neural architecture, integrating these insights into animal models. By emphasizing ecological relevance, we can achieve deeper insights into neuropsychiatric disorders and develop more effective treatment strategies. This approach highlights significant benefits for both scientific inquiry and ethical considerations. The controlled environment is a chimera; it is time to rethink our models. Here, I have chosen the prism of preclinical research on SUD to present, in a nonexhaustive manner, advances enabled by the use of rodent models, the crises faced by animal experimentation, the reflections and responses provided by laboratories, to finally propose rethinking our models around questions of ecological relevance, in order to improve both ethics and scientific quality. Although my discussion is illustrated by the situation in preclinical research on SUD, the observation drawn from it and the proposals made can extend to many other domains and species.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Neuroscience
European Journal of Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
305
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: EJN is the journal of FENS and supports the international neuroscientific community by publishing original high quality research articles and reviews in all fields of neuroscience. In addition, to engage with issues that are of interest to the science community, we also publish Editorials, Meetings Reports and Neuro-Opinions on topics that are of current interest in the fields of neuroscience research and training in science. We have recently established a series of ‘Profiles of Women in Neuroscience’. Our goal is to provide a vehicle for publications that further the understanding of the structure and function of the nervous system in both health and disease and to provide a vehicle to engage the neuroscience community. As the official journal of FENS, profits from the journal are re-invested in the neuroscientific community through the activities of FENS.
期刊最新文献
Effects of Age and Atomoxetine on Olfactory Perception and Learning and Underlying Plasticity Mechanisms in Rats. Still Functional but Limited Postural Adaptation for Individuals With Parkinson's Disease in Goal-Directed Visual Tasks. Rescaling perceptual hand maps by visual-tactile recalibration. Gene expression patterns of the LDL receptor and its inhibitor Pcsk9 in the adult zebrafish brain suggest a possible role in neurogenesis. The association between childhood adversity and hippocampal volumes is moderated by romantic relationship experiences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1