Hiroki Saito, Kotomi Sakai, Motoko Tanaka, Keiko Konomura, Mitsuyoshi Suzuki, Go Tajima, Eri Hoshino
{"title":"新生儿先天性巨细胞病毒感染筛查的经济评价:系统综述。","authors":"Hiroki Saito, Kotomi Sakai, Motoko Tanaka, Keiko Konomura, Mitsuyoshi Suzuki, Go Tajima, Eri Hoshino","doi":"10.1007/s00431-024-05953-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This systematic review analyzes economic evaluations of newborn screening for congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection to identify key factors influencing cost-effectiveness and differences in methodological approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following a pre-registered PROSPERO protocol (CRD42023441587), we conducted a comprehensive literature search across multiple databases on July 4, 2024. The review included both full economic evaluations (cost and outcomes) and partial economic evaluations (cost only). Two reviewers independently performed data extraction and synthesis. Quality assessment used the Consensus Health Economic Criteria extended checklist and the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 Statement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 543 records, nine studies met inclusion criteria: four full and five partial economic evaluations. Two full economic evaluations provided the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per quality-adjusted life year. Full economic evaluations using decision trees and Markov models generally found universal screening more cost-effective than targeted screening, despite higher incremental costs. Partial evaluations focused on direct costs, with varying inclusion of long-term care costs. Most studies adopted a healthcare system perspective, excluding indirect costs. Quality assessment of full economic evaluations revealed high methodological standards but identified common limitations in outcome measurement and reporting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Available evidence suggests potential cost-effectiveness of newborn cCMV screening, particularly with early intervention strategies. However, limited full economic evaluations and heterogeneous methodological approaches preclude definitive conclusions, highlighting the need for additional research across diverse healthcare contexts.</p><p><strong>What is known: </strong>• Congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection is a condition that can be detected through newborn screening, and understanding its economic implications is important for healthcare systems. • Economic evaluations can be categorized into full evaluations (analyzing both costs and outcomes) and partial evaluations (focusing only on costs).</p><p><strong>What is new: </strong>• Based on a systematic review of 543 records, universal screening appears more cost-effective than targeted screening for cCMV, implementation challenges and healthcare system variations significantly impact its practical adoption. • The review identified significant methodological limitations in existing studies, particularly in outcome measurement and reporting, highlighting the need for more comprehensive research across different healthcare contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":11997,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"184 1","pages":"123"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11711639/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic evaluation of newborn screening for congenital cytomegalovirus infection: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Hiroki Saito, Kotomi Sakai, Motoko Tanaka, Keiko Konomura, Mitsuyoshi Suzuki, Go Tajima, Eri Hoshino\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00431-024-05953-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This systematic review analyzes economic evaluations of newborn screening for congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection to identify key factors influencing cost-effectiveness and differences in methodological approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following a pre-registered PROSPERO protocol (CRD42023441587), we conducted a comprehensive literature search across multiple databases on July 4, 2024. The review included both full economic evaluations (cost and outcomes) and partial economic evaluations (cost only). Two reviewers independently performed data extraction and synthesis. Quality assessment used the Consensus Health Economic Criteria extended checklist and the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 Statement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 543 records, nine studies met inclusion criteria: four full and five partial economic evaluations. Two full economic evaluations provided the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per quality-adjusted life year. Full economic evaluations using decision trees and Markov models generally found universal screening more cost-effective than targeted screening, despite higher incremental costs. Partial evaluations focused on direct costs, with varying inclusion of long-term care costs. Most studies adopted a healthcare system perspective, excluding indirect costs. Quality assessment of full economic evaluations revealed high methodological standards but identified common limitations in outcome measurement and reporting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Available evidence suggests potential cost-effectiveness of newborn cCMV screening, particularly with early intervention strategies. However, limited full economic evaluations and heterogeneous methodological approaches preclude definitive conclusions, highlighting the need for additional research across diverse healthcare contexts.</p><p><strong>What is known: </strong>• Congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection is a condition that can be detected through newborn screening, and understanding its economic implications is important for healthcare systems. • Economic evaluations can be categorized into full evaluations (analyzing both costs and outcomes) and partial evaluations (focusing only on costs).</p><p><strong>What is new: </strong>• Based on a systematic review of 543 records, universal screening appears more cost-effective than targeted screening for cCMV, implementation challenges and healthcare system variations significantly impact its practical adoption. • The review identified significant methodological limitations in existing studies, particularly in outcome measurement and reporting, highlighting the need for more comprehensive research across different healthcare contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"184 1\",\"pages\":\"123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11711639/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-024-05953-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-024-05953-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Economic evaluation of newborn screening for congenital cytomegalovirus infection: A systematic review.
Purpose: This systematic review analyzes economic evaluations of newborn screening for congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection to identify key factors influencing cost-effectiveness and differences in methodological approaches.
Methods: Following a pre-registered PROSPERO protocol (CRD42023441587), we conducted a comprehensive literature search across multiple databases on July 4, 2024. The review included both full economic evaluations (cost and outcomes) and partial economic evaluations (cost only). Two reviewers independently performed data extraction and synthesis. Quality assessment used the Consensus Health Economic Criteria extended checklist and the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 Statement.
Results: From 543 records, nine studies met inclusion criteria: four full and five partial economic evaluations. Two full economic evaluations provided the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per quality-adjusted life year. Full economic evaluations using decision trees and Markov models generally found universal screening more cost-effective than targeted screening, despite higher incremental costs. Partial evaluations focused on direct costs, with varying inclusion of long-term care costs. Most studies adopted a healthcare system perspective, excluding indirect costs. Quality assessment of full economic evaluations revealed high methodological standards but identified common limitations in outcome measurement and reporting.
Conclusions: Available evidence suggests potential cost-effectiveness of newborn cCMV screening, particularly with early intervention strategies. However, limited full economic evaluations and heterogeneous methodological approaches preclude definitive conclusions, highlighting the need for additional research across diverse healthcare contexts.
What is known: • Congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection is a condition that can be detected through newborn screening, and understanding its economic implications is important for healthcare systems. • Economic evaluations can be categorized into full evaluations (analyzing both costs and outcomes) and partial evaluations (focusing only on costs).
What is new: • Based on a systematic review of 543 records, universal screening appears more cost-effective than targeted screening for cCMV, implementation challenges and healthcare system variations significantly impact its practical adoption. • The review identified significant methodological limitations in existing studies, particularly in outcome measurement and reporting, highlighting the need for more comprehensive research across different healthcare contexts.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Pediatrics (EJPE) is a leading peer-reviewed medical journal which covers the entire field of pediatrics. The editors encourage authors to submit original articles, reviews, short communications, and correspondence on all relevant themes and topics.
EJPE is particularly committed to the publication of articles on important new clinical research that will have an immediate impact on clinical pediatric practice. The editorial office very much welcomes ideas for publications, whether individual articles or article series, that fit this goal and is always willing to address inquiries from authors regarding potential submissions. Invited review articles on clinical pediatrics that provide comprehensive coverage of a subject of importance are also regularly commissioned.
The short publication time reflects both the commitment of the editors and publishers and their passion for new developments in the field of pediatrics.
EJPE is active on social media (@EurJPediatrics) and we invite you to participate.
EJPE is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP) and publishes guidelines and statements in cooperation with the EAP.