医护人员握力和捏力的规范性值及其预测因素:波斯队列研究。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS International Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1007/s00264-025-06409-3
Mobina Sayadizadeh, Mahla Daliri, Masoumeh Sadeghi, Mehdi Ataei Azimi, Javad Khaje Mozafari, Ali Moradi
{"title":"医护人员握力和捏力的规范性值及其预测因素:波斯队列研究。","authors":"Mobina Sayadizadeh, Mahla Daliri, Masoumeh Sadeghi, Mehdi Ataei Azimi, Javad Khaje Mozafari, Ali Moradi","doi":"10.1007/s00264-025-06409-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The present study aims to provide normative values for Hand Grip Strength (HGS) and Hand Pinch Strength of healthcare staff and evaluate key body anthropometric predictors of these strengths.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross sectional study was conducted on 2,337 healthcare staff. HGS and pinch strength were assessed for both hands using a hydraulic hand dynamometer and pinch gauge. Descriptive data were reported for dominant and non-dominant HGS and pinch strength, after stratification by gender, age, and height. Multivariatelinear regression analysis was performed to assess predictor variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maximum HGS values were identified in men aged 35 to 40, measuring 38.00 ± 7.81 kg, and in women aged 50 to 55, measuring 22.20 ± 4.13 kg. The highest pinch strength values were recorded in men aged 45 to 50, with measurements of 7.16 ± 1.48 kg, and in women aged 35 to 40, with measurements of 4.24 ± 1.15 kg. The predictor variables for dominant HGS and pinch strength exhibited 59% and 51% prediction for variations in dominant HGS and pinch strength, respectively, using gender, height, and wrist circumference as predictors. Height (for grip: dominant hand: β = 0.33, CI [0.28, 0.37]; for pinch: dominant hand: β = 0.04, CI [0.02, 0.05]) was the most effectively correlated anthropometric variable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings demonstrate differences in HGS and pinch strength among different gender and age groups. Multiple linear regression analysis highlights the crucial role of anthropometric variables in evaluating hand strength. These results can provide guidance for future research and clinical assessments.</p><p><strong>Trial registry number: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III (analytical cross-sectional study on big sample size).</p>","PeriodicalId":14450,"journal":{"name":"International Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Normative values of grip and pinch strength and their predictor factors: PERSIAN cohort study of healthcare staff.\",\"authors\":\"Mobina Sayadizadeh, Mahla Daliri, Masoumeh Sadeghi, Mehdi Ataei Azimi, Javad Khaje Mozafari, Ali Moradi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00264-025-06409-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The present study aims to provide normative values for Hand Grip Strength (HGS) and Hand Pinch Strength of healthcare staff and evaluate key body anthropometric predictors of these strengths.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross sectional study was conducted on 2,337 healthcare staff. HGS and pinch strength were assessed for both hands using a hydraulic hand dynamometer and pinch gauge. Descriptive data were reported for dominant and non-dominant HGS and pinch strength, after stratification by gender, age, and height. Multivariatelinear regression analysis was performed to assess predictor variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maximum HGS values were identified in men aged 35 to 40, measuring 38.00 ± 7.81 kg, and in women aged 50 to 55, measuring 22.20 ± 4.13 kg. The highest pinch strength values were recorded in men aged 45 to 50, with measurements of 7.16 ± 1.48 kg, and in women aged 35 to 40, with measurements of 4.24 ± 1.15 kg. The predictor variables for dominant HGS and pinch strength exhibited 59% and 51% prediction for variations in dominant HGS and pinch strength, respectively, using gender, height, and wrist circumference as predictors. Height (for grip: dominant hand: β = 0.33, CI [0.28, 0.37]; for pinch: dominant hand: β = 0.04, CI [0.02, 0.05]) was the most effectively correlated anthropometric variable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings demonstrate differences in HGS and pinch strength among different gender and age groups. Multiple linear regression analysis highlights the crucial role of anthropometric variables in evaluating hand strength. These results can provide guidance for future research and clinical assessments.</p><p><strong>Trial registry number: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III (analytical cross-sectional study on big sample size).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-025-06409-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-025-06409-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在为医护人员的手握力和手捏力提供规范性值,并评估这些力量的关键人体测量预测因子。方法:对2337名医护人员进行横断面研究。使用液压手测功仪和夹紧计评估双手的HGS和夹紧强度。在按性别、年龄和身高分层后,报告了显性和非显性HGS和捏紧强度的描述性数据。采用多元线性回归分析评估预测变量。结果:35 ~ 40岁男性HGS最大值为38.00±7.81 kg, 50 ~ 55岁女性HGS最大值为22.20±4.13 kg。45 ~ 50岁男性的捏紧强度值最高,为7.16±1.48 kg, 35 ~ 40岁女性捏紧强度值最高,为4.24±1.15 kg。使用性别、身高和腕围作为预测变量,优势HGS和捏紧强度的预测变量分别显示出59%和51%的优势HGS和捏紧强度的预测变量。高度(握力:优势手:β = 0.33, CI [0.28, 0.37];捏:优势手:β = 0.04, CI[0.02, 0.05])是最有效相关的人体测量变量。结论:不同性别和年龄的患者HGS和捏紧力存在差异。多元线性回归分析强调了人体测量变量在评估手部力量中的关键作用。这些结果可为今后的研究和临床评价提供指导。试验注册编号:不适用。证据水平:III级(大样本量的分析横断面研究)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Normative values of grip and pinch strength and their predictor factors: PERSIAN cohort study of healthcare staff.

Purpose: The present study aims to provide normative values for Hand Grip Strength (HGS) and Hand Pinch Strength of healthcare staff and evaluate key body anthropometric predictors of these strengths.

Methods: This cross sectional study was conducted on 2,337 healthcare staff. HGS and pinch strength were assessed for both hands using a hydraulic hand dynamometer and pinch gauge. Descriptive data were reported for dominant and non-dominant HGS and pinch strength, after stratification by gender, age, and height. Multivariatelinear regression analysis was performed to assess predictor variables.

Results: The maximum HGS values were identified in men aged 35 to 40, measuring 38.00 ± 7.81 kg, and in women aged 50 to 55, measuring 22.20 ± 4.13 kg. The highest pinch strength values were recorded in men aged 45 to 50, with measurements of 7.16 ± 1.48 kg, and in women aged 35 to 40, with measurements of 4.24 ± 1.15 kg. The predictor variables for dominant HGS and pinch strength exhibited 59% and 51% prediction for variations in dominant HGS and pinch strength, respectively, using gender, height, and wrist circumference as predictors. Height (for grip: dominant hand: β = 0.33, CI [0.28, 0.37]; for pinch: dominant hand: β = 0.04, CI [0.02, 0.05]) was the most effectively correlated anthropometric variable.

Conclusion: The findings demonstrate differences in HGS and pinch strength among different gender and age groups. Multiple linear regression analysis highlights the crucial role of anthropometric variables in evaluating hand strength. These results can provide guidance for future research and clinical assessments.

Trial registry number: Not applicable.

Level of evidence: Level III (analytical cross-sectional study on big sample size).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Orthopaedics
International Orthopaedics 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
360
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: International Orthopaedics, the Official Journal of the Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie (SICOT) , publishes original papers from all over the world. The articles deal with clinical orthopaedic surgery or basic research directly connected with orthopaedic surgery. International Orthopaedics will also link all the members of SICOT by means of an insert that will be concerned with SICOT matters. Finally, it is expected that news and information regarding all aspects of orthopaedic surgery, including meetings, panels, instructional courses, etc. will be brought to the attention of the readers. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted. Reports of animal experiments must state that the "Principles of laboratory animal care" (NIH publication No. 85-23, revised 1985) were followed, as well as specific national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals) where applicable. The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfil the above-mentioned requirements.
期刊最新文献
Sustainability in orthopaedic hospitals - urgent actions for a changing climate. Can we make orthopaedics climate smart? Towards a sustainable future in traumatology and orthopaedic surgery. The contribution of « Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique » (SICOT). Weak hammering sounds are associated with postoperative subsidence in cementless total hip arthroplasty. Wrist extension strength changes after extensor carpi radialis brevis release in the lateral epicondylitis. Evaluating the outcomes of three dimensional printing-assisted osteotomy on treating varus knee deformity from old tibial plateau fractures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1