Evan Y Yu, R Bryan Rumble, Neeraj Agarwal, Heather H Cheng, Scott E Eggener, Rhonda L Bitting, Himisha Beltran, Veda N Giri, Daniel Spratt, Brandon Mahal, Kevin Lu, Tony Crispino, Edouard J Trabulsi
{"title":"转移性前列腺癌的生殖系和体细胞基因组检测:ASCO指南。","authors":"Evan Y Yu, R Bryan Rumble, Neeraj Agarwal, Heather H Cheng, Scott E Eggener, Rhonda L Bitting, Himisha Beltran, Veda N Giri, Daniel Spratt, Brandon Mahal, Kevin Lu, Tony Crispino, Edouard J Trabulsi","doi":"10.1200/JCO-24-02608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate evidence on germline and somatic genomic testing for patients with metastatic prostate cancer and provide recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review by a multidisciplinary panel with patient representation was conducted. The PubMed database was searched from January 2018 to May 2024. Articles were selected for inclusion if they reported on patients with metastatic prostate cancer who received a germline or somatic genomic test and/or made comparisons between those tests, reported detection rates, prognostic information, or treatment implications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,713 papers were identified in the literature search. After applying the eligibility criteria, 14 remained: eight systematic reviews and six clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Recommendations: </strong>Patients with metastatic prostate cancer should undergo both germline and somatic DNA sequencing using panel-based assays. These tests can guide the use of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, which have a survival benefit in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. In addition, germline testing may have screening implications for additional cancers for patients and cascade testing implications for family members. The data supporting when to perform repeat testing and optimal tissue type to use (eg, primary tumor <i>v</i> metastatic biopsy versus circulating tumor DNA [ctDNA] testing) are more limited, but this panel recommends considering retesting in patients whose results were previously negative or uninformative, and to consider either a metastatic biopsy or ctDNA when a significant change in clinical status occurs. Next-generation genomic sequencing findings that are associated with prognostic only (and not predictive) value should not be used to guide treatment outside of a clinical trial.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/genitourinary-cancer-guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"JCO2402608"},"PeriodicalIF":42.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Germline and Somatic Genomic Testing for Metastatic Prostate Cancer: ASCO Guideline.\",\"authors\":\"Evan Y Yu, R Bryan Rumble, Neeraj Agarwal, Heather H Cheng, Scott E Eggener, Rhonda L Bitting, Himisha Beltran, Veda N Giri, Daniel Spratt, Brandon Mahal, Kevin Lu, Tony Crispino, Edouard J Trabulsi\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/JCO-24-02608\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate evidence on germline and somatic genomic testing for patients with metastatic prostate cancer and provide recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review by a multidisciplinary panel with patient representation was conducted. The PubMed database was searched from January 2018 to May 2024. Articles were selected for inclusion if they reported on patients with metastatic prostate cancer who received a germline or somatic genomic test and/or made comparisons between those tests, reported detection rates, prognostic information, or treatment implications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,713 papers were identified in the literature search. After applying the eligibility criteria, 14 remained: eight systematic reviews and six clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Recommendations: </strong>Patients with metastatic prostate cancer should undergo both germline and somatic DNA sequencing using panel-based assays. These tests can guide the use of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, which have a survival benefit in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. In addition, germline testing may have screening implications for additional cancers for patients and cascade testing implications for family members. The data supporting when to perform repeat testing and optimal tissue type to use (eg, primary tumor <i>v</i> metastatic biopsy versus circulating tumor DNA [ctDNA] testing) are more limited, but this panel recommends considering retesting in patients whose results were previously negative or uninformative, and to consider either a metastatic biopsy or ctDNA when a significant change in clinical status occurs. Next-generation genomic sequencing findings that are associated with prognostic only (and not predictive) value should not be used to guide treatment outside of a clinical trial.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/genitourinary-cancer-guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"JCO2402608\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":42.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-24-02608\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-24-02608","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Germline and Somatic Genomic Testing for Metastatic Prostate Cancer: ASCO Guideline.
Purpose: To evaluate evidence on germline and somatic genomic testing for patients with metastatic prostate cancer and provide recommendations.
Methods: A systematic review by a multidisciplinary panel with patient representation was conducted. The PubMed database was searched from January 2018 to May 2024. Articles were selected for inclusion if they reported on patients with metastatic prostate cancer who received a germline or somatic genomic test and/or made comparisons between those tests, reported detection rates, prognostic information, or treatment implications.
Results: A total of 1,713 papers were identified in the literature search. After applying the eligibility criteria, 14 remained: eight systematic reviews and six clinical trials.
Recommendations: Patients with metastatic prostate cancer should undergo both germline and somatic DNA sequencing using panel-based assays. These tests can guide the use of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, which have a survival benefit in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. In addition, germline testing may have screening implications for additional cancers for patients and cascade testing implications for family members. The data supporting when to perform repeat testing and optimal tissue type to use (eg, primary tumor v metastatic biopsy versus circulating tumor DNA [ctDNA] testing) are more limited, but this panel recommends considering retesting in patients whose results were previously negative or uninformative, and to consider either a metastatic biopsy or ctDNA when a significant change in clinical status occurs. Next-generation genomic sequencing findings that are associated with prognostic only (and not predictive) value should not be used to guide treatment outside of a clinical trial.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/genitourinary-cancer-guidelines.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Oncology serves its readers as the single most credible, authoritative resource for disseminating significant clinical oncology research. In print and in electronic format, JCO strives to publish the highest quality articles dedicated to clinical research. Original Reports remain the focus of JCO, but this scientific communication is enhanced by appropriately selected Editorials, Commentaries, Reviews, and other work that relate to the care of patients with cancer.