Kanwal Pratap Singh Raghav, Katherine A Guthrie, Benjamin Tan, Crystal S Denlinger, Marwan Fakih, Michael J Overman, N Arvind Dasari, Larry R Corum, Lee G Hicks, Mital S Patel, Benjamin T Esparaz, Syed M Kazmi, Nitya Alluri, Sarah Colby, Sepideh Gholami, Philip J Gold, E Gabriela Chiorean, Scott Kopetz, Howard S Hochster, Philip A Philip
{"title":"曲妥珠单抗+帕妥珠单抗vs西妥昔单抗+伊立替康治疗RAS/BRAF野生型her2阳性转移性结直肠癌(S1613):一项随机II期试验","authors":"Kanwal Pratap Singh Raghav, Katherine A Guthrie, Benjamin Tan, Crystal S Denlinger, Marwan Fakih, Michael J Overman, N Arvind Dasari, Larry R Corum, Lee G Hicks, Mital S Patel, Benjamin T Esparaz, Syed M Kazmi, Nitya Alluri, Sarah Colby, Sepideh Gholami, Philip J Gold, E Gabriela Chiorean, Scott Kopetz, Howard S Hochster, Philip A Philip","doi":"10.1200/JCO-24-01710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong><i>ERBB2</i> overexpression/amplification in <i>RAS/BRAF</i> wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC; human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2]-positive mCRC) appears to be associated with limited benefit from anti-EGFR antibodies and promising responses to dual-HER2 inhibition; however, comparative efficacy has not been investigated. We conducted a randomized phase II trial to evaluate efficacy and safety of dual-HER2 inhibition against standard-of-care anti-EGFR antibody-based therapy as second/third-line treatment in HER2-positive mCRC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with <i>RAS/BRAF</i>-WT mCRC after central confirmation of HER2 positivity (immunohistochemistry 3+ or 2+ and in situ hybridization amplified [HER2/CEP17 ratio >2.0]) were assigned (1:1) to either trastuzumab plus pertuzumab (TP; trastuzumab 6 mg/kg and pertuzumab 420 mg once every 3 weeks) or cetuximab plus irinotecan (CETIRI; cetuximab 500 mg/m<sup>2</sup> and irinotecan 180 mg/m<sup>2</sup> once every 2 weeks) until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Crossover to TP was allowed after progression on CETIRI. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival, safety, and <i>HER2</i> gene copy number (GCN ≥20/<20) as a predictive factor.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between October 2017 and March 2022, 54 participants were assigned to TP (n = 26) and CETIRI (n = 28). Median PFS did not vary significantly by treatment: 4.7 (95% CI, 1.9 to 7.6) and 3.7 (95% CI, 1.6 to 6.7) months in the TP and CETIRI groups, respectively. Efficacy of TP versus CETIRI differed significantly by <i>HER2</i> GCN (median PFS, GCN ≥20 [9.9 <i>v</i> 2.9 months] and GCN <20 [3.0 <i>v</i> 4.2 months], respectively; <i>P</i> interaction = .003). On TP, ORR was 34.6% (57.1% with GCN ≥20 <i>v</i> 9.1% with GCN <20) with median GCN of 29.7 versus 13.2 for responders and nonresponders, respectively (<i>P</i> = .004). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 23.1% and 46.1% of participants with TP and CETIRI, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TP appears to be a safe and effective cytotoxic chemotherapy-free option for patients with <i>RAS/BRAF</i>-WT, HER2-positive mCRC. Higher levels of <i>HER2</i> amplification were associated with greater degree of clinical benefit from TP vis-à-vis CETIRI.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"JCO2401710"},"PeriodicalIF":42.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trastuzumab Plus Pertuzumab Versus Cetuximab Plus Irinotecan in Patients With <i>RAS/BRAF</i> Wild-Type, HER2-Positive, Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (S1613): A Randomized Phase II Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Kanwal Pratap Singh Raghav, Katherine A Guthrie, Benjamin Tan, Crystal S Denlinger, Marwan Fakih, Michael J Overman, N Arvind Dasari, Larry R Corum, Lee G Hicks, Mital S Patel, Benjamin T Esparaz, Syed M Kazmi, Nitya Alluri, Sarah Colby, Sepideh Gholami, Philip J Gold, E Gabriela Chiorean, Scott Kopetz, Howard S Hochster, Philip A Philip\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/JCO-24-01710\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong><i>ERBB2</i> overexpression/amplification in <i>RAS/BRAF</i> wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC; human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2]-positive mCRC) appears to be associated with limited benefit from anti-EGFR antibodies and promising responses to dual-HER2 inhibition; however, comparative efficacy has not been investigated. We conducted a randomized phase II trial to evaluate efficacy and safety of dual-HER2 inhibition against standard-of-care anti-EGFR antibody-based therapy as second/third-line treatment in HER2-positive mCRC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with <i>RAS/BRAF</i>-WT mCRC after central confirmation of HER2 positivity (immunohistochemistry 3+ or 2+ and in situ hybridization amplified [HER2/CEP17 ratio >2.0]) were assigned (1:1) to either trastuzumab plus pertuzumab (TP; trastuzumab 6 mg/kg and pertuzumab 420 mg once every 3 weeks) or cetuximab plus irinotecan (CETIRI; cetuximab 500 mg/m<sup>2</sup> and irinotecan 180 mg/m<sup>2</sup> once every 2 weeks) until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Crossover to TP was allowed after progression on CETIRI. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival, safety, and <i>HER2</i> gene copy number (GCN ≥20/<20) as a predictive factor.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between October 2017 and March 2022, 54 participants were assigned to TP (n = 26) and CETIRI (n = 28). Median PFS did not vary significantly by treatment: 4.7 (95% CI, 1.9 to 7.6) and 3.7 (95% CI, 1.6 to 6.7) months in the TP and CETIRI groups, respectively. Efficacy of TP versus CETIRI differed significantly by <i>HER2</i> GCN (median PFS, GCN ≥20 [9.9 <i>v</i> 2.9 months] and GCN <20 [3.0 <i>v</i> 4.2 months], respectively; <i>P</i> interaction = .003). On TP, ORR was 34.6% (57.1% with GCN ≥20 <i>v</i> 9.1% with GCN <20) with median GCN of 29.7 versus 13.2 for responders and nonresponders, respectively (<i>P</i> = .004). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 23.1% and 46.1% of participants with TP and CETIRI, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TP appears to be a safe and effective cytotoxic chemotherapy-free option for patients with <i>RAS/BRAF</i>-WT, HER2-positive mCRC. Higher levels of <i>HER2</i> amplification were associated with greater degree of clinical benefit from TP vis-à-vis CETIRI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"JCO2401710\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":42.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-24-01710\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-24-01710","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Trastuzumab Plus Pertuzumab Versus Cetuximab Plus Irinotecan in Patients With RAS/BRAF Wild-Type, HER2-Positive, Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (S1613): A Randomized Phase II Trial.
Purpose: ERBB2 overexpression/amplification in RAS/BRAF wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC; human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2]-positive mCRC) appears to be associated with limited benefit from anti-EGFR antibodies and promising responses to dual-HER2 inhibition; however, comparative efficacy has not been investigated. We conducted a randomized phase II trial to evaluate efficacy and safety of dual-HER2 inhibition against standard-of-care anti-EGFR antibody-based therapy as second/third-line treatment in HER2-positive mCRC.
Methods: Patients with RAS/BRAF-WT mCRC after central confirmation of HER2 positivity (immunohistochemistry 3+ or 2+ and in situ hybridization amplified [HER2/CEP17 ratio >2.0]) were assigned (1:1) to either trastuzumab plus pertuzumab (TP; trastuzumab 6 mg/kg and pertuzumab 420 mg once every 3 weeks) or cetuximab plus irinotecan (CETIRI; cetuximab 500 mg/m2 and irinotecan 180 mg/m2 once every 2 weeks) until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Crossover to TP was allowed after progression on CETIRI. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival, safety, and HER2 gene copy number (GCN ≥20/<20) as a predictive factor.
Results: Between October 2017 and March 2022, 54 participants were assigned to TP (n = 26) and CETIRI (n = 28). Median PFS did not vary significantly by treatment: 4.7 (95% CI, 1.9 to 7.6) and 3.7 (95% CI, 1.6 to 6.7) months in the TP and CETIRI groups, respectively. Efficacy of TP versus CETIRI differed significantly by HER2 GCN (median PFS, GCN ≥20 [9.9 v 2.9 months] and GCN <20 [3.0 v 4.2 months], respectively; P interaction = .003). On TP, ORR was 34.6% (57.1% with GCN ≥20 v 9.1% with GCN <20) with median GCN of 29.7 versus 13.2 for responders and nonresponders, respectively (P = .004). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 23.1% and 46.1% of participants with TP and CETIRI, respectively.
Conclusion: TP appears to be a safe and effective cytotoxic chemotherapy-free option for patients with RAS/BRAF-WT, HER2-positive mCRC. Higher levels of HER2 amplification were associated with greater degree of clinical benefit from TP vis-à-vis CETIRI.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Oncology serves its readers as the single most credible, authoritative resource for disseminating significant clinical oncology research. In print and in electronic format, JCO strives to publish the highest quality articles dedicated to clinical research. Original Reports remain the focus of JCO, but this scientific communication is enhanced by appropriately selected Editorials, Commentaries, Reviews, and other work that relate to the care of patients with cancer.