静脉支链氨基酸给药急性治疗肝性脑病:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of Intensive Care Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1186/s40560-024-00771-x
Shoji Yokobori, Tomoaki Yatabe, Yutaka Kondo, Yasuhiko Ajimi, Manabu Araki, Norio Chihara, Masao Nagayama, Tetsuya Samkamoto
{"title":"静脉支链氨基酸给药急性治疗肝性脑病:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Shoji Yokobori, Tomoaki Yatabe, Yutaka Kondo, Yasuhiko Ajimi, Manabu Araki, Norio Chihara, Masao Nagayama, Tetsuya Samkamoto","doi":"10.1186/s40560-024-00771-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a severe complication of acute hepatic failure requiring urgent critical care management. Branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) such as leucine, isoleucine, and valine have been investigated as potential treatments to improve outcomes in patients with acute HE. However, the effectiveness of BCAA administration during the acute phase remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of intravenous BCAA (IV-BCAA) treatment on clinical outcomes in patients with acute HE by systematically reviewing and analyzing randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Igaku Chuo Zasshi (ICHUSHI), a Japanese database for medical literature. We included RCTs involving adult patients with acute HE who received IV-BCAA or placebo during the acute phase after admission (< 7 days). Two reviewers independently screened the citations and extracted data. The primary \"critical\" outcomes were mortality from any cause and improvement in disturbance of consciousness. The secondary \"important\" outcome included the incidence of complications such as nausea and diarrhea. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated using random effects models with inverse variance weighting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 2073 screened records, four met the criteria for quantitative analysis. The analysis included 219 patients: 109 received IV-BCAA, and 110 received placebo. Improvement in the disturbance of consciousness and mortality were not significantly different between the two groups (RR, 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96-1.66; RR, 0.90; 95% CI 0.70-1.16, respectively). Following IV-BCAA administration, the absolute differences of improvement in the disturbance of consciousness and mortality were 118 more per 1000 (95% CI 18 fewer-300 more) and 55 fewer per 1000 (95% CI 165 fewer-88 more), respectively. No significant differences were observed in the incidence of nausea or diarrhea between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our meta-analysis demonstrates that all outcomes were not significantly different between IV-BCAA treatment and placebo for acute HE. Further RCTs are required to better understand IV-BCAA treatment potential in patients with HE.</p>","PeriodicalId":16123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care","volume":"13 1","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11716518/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intravenous branched-chain amino acid administration for the acute treatment of hepatic encephalopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Shoji Yokobori, Tomoaki Yatabe, Yutaka Kondo, Yasuhiko Ajimi, Manabu Araki, Norio Chihara, Masao Nagayama, Tetsuya Samkamoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40560-024-00771-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a severe complication of acute hepatic failure requiring urgent critical care management. Branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) such as leucine, isoleucine, and valine have been investigated as potential treatments to improve outcomes in patients with acute HE. However, the effectiveness of BCAA administration during the acute phase remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of intravenous BCAA (IV-BCAA) treatment on clinical outcomes in patients with acute HE by systematically reviewing and analyzing randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Igaku Chuo Zasshi (ICHUSHI), a Japanese database for medical literature. We included RCTs involving adult patients with acute HE who received IV-BCAA or placebo during the acute phase after admission (< 7 days). Two reviewers independently screened the citations and extracted data. The primary \\\"critical\\\" outcomes were mortality from any cause and improvement in disturbance of consciousness. The secondary \\\"important\\\" outcome included the incidence of complications such as nausea and diarrhea. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated using random effects models with inverse variance weighting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 2073 screened records, four met the criteria for quantitative analysis. The analysis included 219 patients: 109 received IV-BCAA, and 110 received placebo. Improvement in the disturbance of consciousness and mortality were not significantly different between the two groups (RR, 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96-1.66; RR, 0.90; 95% CI 0.70-1.16, respectively). Following IV-BCAA administration, the absolute differences of improvement in the disturbance of consciousness and mortality were 118 more per 1000 (95% CI 18 fewer-300 more) and 55 fewer per 1000 (95% CI 165 fewer-88 more), respectively. No significant differences were observed in the incidence of nausea or diarrhea between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our meta-analysis demonstrates that all outcomes were not significantly different between IV-BCAA treatment and placebo for acute HE. Further RCTs are required to better understand IV-BCAA treatment potential in patients with HE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intensive Care\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11716518/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intensive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-024-00771-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-024-00771-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肝性脑病(HE)是急性肝功能衰竭的严重并发症,需要紧急的重症监护管理。支链氨基酸(BCAAs)如亮氨酸、异亮氨酸和缬氨酸已被研究作为改善急性HE患者预后的潜在治疗方法。然而,急性期给药BCAA的有效性尚不清楚。本研究旨在通过系统回顾和分析随机对照试验(RCTs),评价静脉注射BCAA (IV-BCAA)治疗对急性HE患者临床结局的影响。方法:我们对MEDLINE、Cochrane中央对照试验注册库和日本医学文献数据库Igaku Chuo zashi (ICHUSHI)进行了全面的文献检索。我们纳入了在入院后急性期接受IV-BCAA或安慰剂治疗的成年急性HE患者的随机对照试验(结果:在筛选的2073例记录中,有4例符合定量分析标准。分析包括219例患者:109例接受IV-BCAA治疗,110例接受安慰剂治疗。两组患者在意识障碍和死亡率方面的改善无显著差异(RR, 1.26;95%置信区间[CI], 0.96-1.66;RR 0.90;95% CI分别为0.70-1.16)。IV-BCAA给药后,意识障碍改善和死亡率的绝对差异分别为118 / 1000 (95% CI 18 -300)和55 / 1000 (95% CI 165 -88)。两组患者的恶心和腹泻发生率无显著差异。结论:我们的荟萃分析表明,IV-BCAA治疗与安慰剂治疗急性HE的所有结果无显著差异。需要进一步的随机对照试验来更好地了解IV-BCAA在HE患者中的治疗潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intravenous branched-chain amino acid administration for the acute treatment of hepatic encephalopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a severe complication of acute hepatic failure requiring urgent critical care management. Branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) such as leucine, isoleucine, and valine have been investigated as potential treatments to improve outcomes in patients with acute HE. However, the effectiveness of BCAA administration during the acute phase remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of intravenous BCAA (IV-BCAA) treatment on clinical outcomes in patients with acute HE by systematically reviewing and analyzing randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Igaku Chuo Zasshi (ICHUSHI), a Japanese database for medical literature. We included RCTs involving adult patients with acute HE who received IV-BCAA or placebo during the acute phase after admission (< 7 days). Two reviewers independently screened the citations and extracted data. The primary "critical" outcomes were mortality from any cause and improvement in disturbance of consciousness. The secondary "important" outcome included the incidence of complications such as nausea and diarrhea. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated using random effects models with inverse variance weighting.

Results: Among the 2073 screened records, four met the criteria for quantitative analysis. The analysis included 219 patients: 109 received IV-BCAA, and 110 received placebo. Improvement in the disturbance of consciousness and mortality were not significantly different between the two groups (RR, 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96-1.66; RR, 0.90; 95% CI 0.70-1.16, respectively). Following IV-BCAA administration, the absolute differences of improvement in the disturbance of consciousness and mortality were 118 more per 1000 (95% CI 18 fewer-300 more) and 55 fewer per 1000 (95% CI 165 fewer-88 more), respectively. No significant differences were observed in the incidence of nausea or diarrhea between the two groups.

Conclusions: Our meta-analysis demonstrates that all outcomes were not significantly different between IV-BCAA treatment and placebo for acute HE. Further RCTs are required to better understand IV-BCAA treatment potential in patients with HE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
1.40%
发文量
51
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: "Journal of Intensive Care" is an open access journal dedicated to the comprehensive coverage of intensive care medicine, providing a platform for the latest research and clinical insights in this critical field. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including intensive and critical care, trauma and surgical intensive care, pediatric intensive care, acute and emergency medicine, perioperative medicine, resuscitation, infection control, and organ dysfunction. Recognizing the importance of cultural diversity in healthcare practices, "Journal of Intensive Care" also encourages submissions that explore and discuss the cultural aspects of intensive care, aiming to promote a more inclusive and culturally sensitive approach to patient care. By fostering a global exchange of knowledge and expertise, the journal contributes to the continuous improvement of intensive care practices worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Early systemic insults following severe sepsis-associated encephalopathy of critically ill patients: association with mortality and awakening-an analysis of the OUTCOMEREA database. Age-dependent differences in the association between blood interleukin-6 levels and mortality in patients with sepsis: a retrospective observational study. Impact of hyper- and hypothermia on cellular and whole-body physiology. Intravenous branched-chain amino acid administration for the acute treatment of hepatic encephalopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sepsis-induced cardiogenic shock: controversies and evidence gaps in diagnosis and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1