Mohammad S Farooq, Gracia M Vargas, Neha Shafique, Jennifer Guo, John T Miura, Giorgos C Karakousis
{"title":"淋巴结清扫治疗黑色素瘤:术后预后的当代趋势和mslt2后病例量减少的患者选择","authors":"Mohammad S Farooq, Gracia M Vargas, Neha Shafique, Jennifer Guo, John T Miura, Giorgos C Karakousis","doi":"10.1002/jso.28075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Since the publication of the German Cooperative Oncology Group Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial and Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial II (MSLT2) trials, the treatment paradigm for node-positive melanoma has shifted from completion lymph node dissection (LND) to nodal ultrasound surveillance. We sought to identify the impact of this practice change on postoperative outcomes in a national cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients diagnosed with truncal/extremity malignant melanoma who underwent axillary/inguinal LND. Patients diagnosed with head/neck melanoma with subsequent cervical LND were also analyzed separately. Trends in case volumes, clinicodemographic patient characteristics, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There has been a reduction of patients undergoing axillary/inguinal LND in the post-MSLT2 era (24.1% vs. 19.0%, p < 0.01). Furthermore, these patients are older (63 vs. 59 years, p < 0.01) and have worse systemic comorbidities (ASA class 3+ +54% vs. 42%, p <0.01). Despite this, postoperative outcomes remain unchanged. For cervical LND, no significant changes in case volumes or clinicodemographic factors were found. Apart from an increase in superficial skin infections in the post-MSLT2 cohort, postoperative outcomes remain largely unchanged.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Continued efforts should be made to optimize patient selection and maintain acceptable postoperative morbidity for LND as it becomes more sparingly utilized in the care of patients with melanoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lymph Node Dissection for Melanoma: Contemporary Trends in Postoperative Outcomes and Patient Selection With Reduced Case Volumes in the Post-MSLT2 Era.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad S Farooq, Gracia M Vargas, Neha Shafique, Jennifer Guo, John T Miura, Giorgos C Karakousis\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jso.28075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Since the publication of the German Cooperative Oncology Group Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial and Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial II (MSLT2) trials, the treatment paradigm for node-positive melanoma has shifted from completion lymph node dissection (LND) to nodal ultrasound surveillance. We sought to identify the impact of this practice change on postoperative outcomes in a national cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients diagnosed with truncal/extremity malignant melanoma who underwent axillary/inguinal LND. Patients diagnosed with head/neck melanoma with subsequent cervical LND were also analyzed separately. Trends in case volumes, clinicodemographic patient characteristics, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There has been a reduction of patients undergoing axillary/inguinal LND in the post-MSLT2 era (24.1% vs. 19.0%, p < 0.01). Furthermore, these patients are older (63 vs. 59 years, p < 0.01) and have worse systemic comorbidities (ASA class 3+ +54% vs. 42%, p <0.01). Despite this, postoperative outcomes remain unchanged. For cervical LND, no significant changes in case volumes or clinicodemographic factors were found. Apart from an increase in superficial skin infections in the post-MSLT2 cohort, postoperative outcomes remain largely unchanged.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Continued efforts should be made to optimize patient selection and maintain acceptable postoperative morbidity for LND as it becomes more sparingly utilized in the care of patients with melanoma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.28075\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.28075","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:自从德国合作肿瘤学组选择性淋巴结切除术试验和多中心选择性淋巴结切除术试验II (MSLT2)试验发表以来,淋巴结阳性黑色素瘤的治疗模式已经从完全淋巴结清扫(LND)转向淋巴结超声监测。我们试图在一个国家队列中确定这种做法改变对术后结果的影响。方法:查询美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划数据库中诊断为躯干/四肢恶性黑色素瘤并行腋窝/腹股沟LND的患者。诊断为头颈部黑色素瘤并随后发生颈部LND的患者也被单独分析。使用单变量和多变量分析分析病例量、临床人口学患者特征和术后结果的趋势。结果:mslt2后腋窝/腹股沟LND患者减少(24.1% vs. 19.0%)。结论:随着LND在黑色素瘤患者的治疗中越来越少地使用,应继续努力优化患者选择并保持可接受的术后发病率。
Lymph Node Dissection for Melanoma: Contemporary Trends in Postoperative Outcomes and Patient Selection With Reduced Case Volumes in the Post-MSLT2 Era.
Background and objectives: Since the publication of the German Cooperative Oncology Group Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial and Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial II (MSLT2) trials, the treatment paradigm for node-positive melanoma has shifted from completion lymph node dissection (LND) to nodal ultrasound surveillance. We sought to identify the impact of this practice change on postoperative outcomes in a national cohort.
Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients diagnosed with truncal/extremity malignant melanoma who underwent axillary/inguinal LND. Patients diagnosed with head/neck melanoma with subsequent cervical LND were also analyzed separately. Trends in case volumes, clinicodemographic patient characteristics, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses.
Results: There has been a reduction of patients undergoing axillary/inguinal LND in the post-MSLT2 era (24.1% vs. 19.0%, p < 0.01). Furthermore, these patients are older (63 vs. 59 years, p < 0.01) and have worse systemic comorbidities (ASA class 3+ +54% vs. 42%, p <0.01). Despite this, postoperative outcomes remain unchanged. For cervical LND, no significant changes in case volumes or clinicodemographic factors were found. Apart from an increase in superficial skin infections in the post-MSLT2 cohort, postoperative outcomes remain largely unchanged.
Conclusions: Continued efforts should be made to optimize patient selection and maintain acceptable postoperative morbidity for LND as it becomes more sparingly utilized in the care of patients with melanoma.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.