东南地区的姑息治疗咨询:尽管住院时间延长,但再入院率较低。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of palliative medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1089/jpm.2024.0298
Hillary E Davis, Heather Reed-Day, Erin W Jackson, R Eric Heidel, Justin Wolfe, Adam J Tyson
{"title":"东南地区的姑息治疗咨询:尽管住院时间延长,但再入院率较低。","authors":"Hillary E Davis, Heather Reed-Day, Erin W Jackson, R Eric Heidel, Justin Wolfe, Adam J Tyson","doi":"10.1089/jpm.2024.0298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background</i></b>: Inpatient palliative care (PC) consultations are increasingly used to address operational challenges. We aimed to understand how PC consultations in a southeastern program, affected by pandemic-related care delays, impacted common clinical performance metrics. <b><i>Methods</i></b>: This is a retrospective analysis of a tertiary system's adult patients who received PC consultations from December 2021 to August 2022. A Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Groups (MS-DRG) code was identified for each PC encounter, and a comparison cohort was created from non-PC encounters. <b><i>Outcomes</i></b>: There were 1906 patients who received a PC consultation and 7730 patients in the matched cohort. Patients receiving a PC consultation were older (mean age 68.55 years) compared with the matched cohort (mean age 62.75 years). Despite a significantly longer length of stay (LOS) (12.46 days vs. 6.99 days, <i>p</i> < 0.001), the PC group experienced a lower readmission rate (adjusted odds ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.44-0.65, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b><i>Conclusions</i></b>: Our cohort study using MS-DRG matching indicates that despite increased LOS, PC consultations were associated with significantly lower readmission rates. This suggests their potential to improve resource utilization, especially in regions affected by pandemic-deferred care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Palliative Care Consults in the Southeast: Lower Readmissions Despite Increased Length of Stay.\",\"authors\":\"Hillary E Davis, Heather Reed-Day, Erin W Jackson, R Eric Heidel, Justin Wolfe, Adam J Tyson\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/jpm.2024.0298\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background</i></b>: Inpatient palliative care (PC) consultations are increasingly used to address operational challenges. We aimed to understand how PC consultations in a southeastern program, affected by pandemic-related care delays, impacted common clinical performance metrics. <b><i>Methods</i></b>: This is a retrospective analysis of a tertiary system's adult patients who received PC consultations from December 2021 to August 2022. A Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Groups (MS-DRG) code was identified for each PC encounter, and a comparison cohort was created from non-PC encounters. <b><i>Outcomes</i></b>: There were 1906 patients who received a PC consultation and 7730 patients in the matched cohort. Patients receiving a PC consultation were older (mean age 68.55 years) compared with the matched cohort (mean age 62.75 years). Despite a significantly longer length of stay (LOS) (12.46 days vs. 6.99 days, <i>p</i> < 0.001), the PC group experienced a lower readmission rate (adjusted odds ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.44-0.65, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b><i>Conclusions</i></b>: Our cohort study using MS-DRG matching indicates that despite increased LOS, PC consultations were associated with significantly lower readmission rates. This suggests their potential to improve resource utilization, especially in regions affected by pandemic-deferred care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of palliative medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of palliative medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0298\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0298","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:住院姑息治疗(PC)咨询越来越多地用于解决业务挑战。我们的目的是了解受流行病相关护理延误影响的东南项目的PC咨询如何影响常见的临床绩效指标。方法:回顾性分析2021年12月至2022年8月期间接受PC咨询的三级系统成年患者。医疗保险严重程度诊断相关组(MS-DRG)代码被识别为每个PC遭遇,并从非PC遭遇创建一个比较队列。结果:有1906名患者接受了PC咨询,匹配队列中有7730名患者。与匹配队列(平均年龄62.75岁)相比,接受PC咨询的患者年龄较大(平均年龄68.55岁)。尽管住院时间(LOS)明显更长(12.46天vs. 6.99天,p < 0.001),但PC组的再入院率较低(调整优势比0.54,95%可信区间0.44-0.65,p < 0.001)。结论:我们使用MS-DRG匹配的队列研究表明,尽管LOS增加,PC咨询与再入院率显著降低相关。这表明它们具有改善资源利用的潜力,特别是在受大流行病延迟治疗影响的地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Palliative Care Consults in the Southeast: Lower Readmissions Despite Increased Length of Stay.

Background: Inpatient palliative care (PC) consultations are increasingly used to address operational challenges. We aimed to understand how PC consultations in a southeastern program, affected by pandemic-related care delays, impacted common clinical performance metrics. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of a tertiary system's adult patients who received PC consultations from December 2021 to August 2022. A Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Groups (MS-DRG) code was identified for each PC encounter, and a comparison cohort was created from non-PC encounters. Outcomes: There were 1906 patients who received a PC consultation and 7730 patients in the matched cohort. Patients receiving a PC consultation were older (mean age 68.55 years) compared with the matched cohort (mean age 62.75 years). Despite a significantly longer length of stay (LOS) (12.46 days vs. 6.99 days, p < 0.001), the PC group experienced a lower readmission rate (adjusted odds ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.44-0.65, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our cohort study using MS-DRG matching indicates that despite increased LOS, PC consultations were associated with significantly lower readmission rates. This suggests their potential to improve resource utilization, especially in regions affected by pandemic-deferred care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of palliative medicine
Journal of palliative medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
345
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Palliative Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed journal covering medical, psychosocial, policy, and legal issues in end-of-life care and relief of suffering for patients with intractable pain. The Journal presents essential information for professionals in hospice/palliative medicine, focusing on improving quality of life for patients and their families, and the latest developments in drug and non-drug treatments. The companion biweekly eNewsletter, Briefings in Palliative Medicine, delivers the latest breaking news and information to keep clinicians and health care providers continuously updated.
期刊最新文献
"Telehealth Allows for Flexibility and More Equity": Provider Perspectives on Telehealth for Outpatient Palliative Care for Underserved Patients. Grief and Bereavement in Pediatric Palliative Care #502. A Systematic Review of Grief Experiences of Children Who Have Lost a Sibling. Pancreatic Enzyme Supplementation for Patients with Pancreatic Cancer #500. Letter to the Editor: Error in Estimating Prevalence of Iatrogenic Opioid Use Disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1