Christopher C Stewart, Lisa Reider, Rachel Soifer, Nikan K Namiri, Robert V O'Toole, Madhav A Karunakar, Benjamin K Potter, Michael Bosse, Saam Morshed
{"title":"高能下肢创伤的手术负担是什么?OUTLET研究的二次分析。","authors":"Christopher C Stewart, Lisa Reider, Rachel Soifer, Nikan K Namiri, Robert V O'Toole, Madhav A Karunakar, Benjamin K Potter, Michael Bosse, Saam Morshed","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe and enumerate surgeries for patients who underwent reconstruction or amputation after severe distal tibia, ankle, and mid to hindfoot injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design: Secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>31 U.S. level-I trauma centers and 3 military treatment facilities.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Participants aged 18 to 60 with Gustilo type-III pilon (OTA 43B or 43C), IIIB or C ankle fracture (OTA 44A, 44B, or 44C), type-III talar or calcaneal fracture (OTA 81B, 82B, or 82C), or open or closed crush or blast injuries to the hindfoot or midfoot who underwent limb reconstruction or amputation from 2012 to 2017.</p><p><strong>Outcome measurements and comparisons: </strong>Number of temporizing, definitive, and complication surgeries were compared by treatment and injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>574 participants with 221 ankle and pilon, 140 talus and calcaneal, and 213 other foot injuries were followed for 18 months. The mean age was 38 (range 8-64) and 33% were female. Participants underwent reconstruction (n=472), primary amputation (n=76), and failed reconstruction followed by amputation (n=26). 841 temporizing, 958 definitive, and 501 complication surgeries were performed. The number of surgeries was highest for those who underwent failed reconstruction (mean 5.8, 95% CI: 4.9-6.8, range 3-13) compared to reconstruction (mean 3.8, 95% CI: 3.5-4.0, range 1-21), and primary amputation (mean 4.9, 95% CI: 4.3-5.5, range 2-14) (p<0.01). Those with ankle and pilon injuries required more surgeries (4.7, 95% CI: 4.3-5.1, range 1-21) than hindfoot (3.4, 95% CI: 3.0-3.7, range 1-10), and other foot injuries (3.7, 95% CI: 3.4-4.0, range 1-14) (p<0.01). The average participant would complete definitive treatment 23 days after their injury, and those who required surgery for a complication spent 41 days in the complication phase of treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with high-energy lower extremity trauma underwent nearly 4 surgeries over 3 weeks until completion of definitive treatment, regardless of whether they underwent limb reconstruction or amputation. Those with ankle or pilon injuries and failed reconstruction attempts experienced the most operations, and those with complications required over an additional month of surgical care. These data may inform a shared decision-making process around limb optimization.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level II.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is the Surgical Burden of Treatment for High-Energy Lower Extremity Trauma? A Secondary Analysis of the OUTLET Study.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher C Stewart, Lisa Reider, Rachel Soifer, Nikan K Namiri, Robert V O'Toole, Madhav A Karunakar, Benjamin K Potter, Michael Bosse, Saam Morshed\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002959\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe and enumerate surgeries for patients who underwent reconstruction or amputation after severe distal tibia, ankle, and mid to hindfoot injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design: Secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>31 U.S. level-I trauma centers and 3 military treatment facilities.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Participants aged 18 to 60 with Gustilo type-III pilon (OTA 43B or 43C), IIIB or C ankle fracture (OTA 44A, 44B, or 44C), type-III talar or calcaneal fracture (OTA 81B, 82B, or 82C), or open or closed crush or blast injuries to the hindfoot or midfoot who underwent limb reconstruction or amputation from 2012 to 2017.</p><p><strong>Outcome measurements and comparisons: </strong>Number of temporizing, definitive, and complication surgeries were compared by treatment and injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>574 participants with 221 ankle and pilon, 140 talus and calcaneal, and 213 other foot injuries were followed for 18 months. The mean age was 38 (range 8-64) and 33% were female. Participants underwent reconstruction (n=472), primary amputation (n=76), and failed reconstruction followed by amputation (n=26). 841 temporizing, 958 definitive, and 501 complication surgeries were performed. The number of surgeries was highest for those who underwent failed reconstruction (mean 5.8, 95% CI: 4.9-6.8, range 3-13) compared to reconstruction (mean 3.8, 95% CI: 3.5-4.0, range 1-21), and primary amputation (mean 4.9, 95% CI: 4.3-5.5, range 2-14) (p<0.01). Those with ankle and pilon injuries required more surgeries (4.7, 95% CI: 4.3-5.1, range 1-21) than hindfoot (3.4, 95% CI: 3.0-3.7, range 1-10), and other foot injuries (3.7, 95% CI: 3.4-4.0, range 1-14) (p<0.01). The average participant would complete definitive treatment 23 days after their injury, and those who required surgery for a complication spent 41 days in the complication phase of treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with high-energy lower extremity trauma underwent nearly 4 surgeries over 3 weeks until completion of definitive treatment, regardless of whether they underwent limb reconstruction or amputation. Those with ankle or pilon injuries and failed reconstruction attempts experienced the most operations, and those with complications required over an additional month of surgical care. These data may inform a shared decision-making process around limb optimization.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level II.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002959\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002959","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
What is the Surgical Burden of Treatment for High-Energy Lower Extremity Trauma? A Secondary Analysis of the OUTLET Study.
Objectives: To describe and enumerate surgeries for patients who underwent reconstruction or amputation after severe distal tibia, ankle, and mid to hindfoot injuries.
Methods: Design: Secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective observational study.
Setting: 31 U.S. level-I trauma centers and 3 military treatment facilities.
Patient selection criteria: Participants aged 18 to 60 with Gustilo type-III pilon (OTA 43B or 43C), IIIB or C ankle fracture (OTA 44A, 44B, or 44C), type-III talar or calcaneal fracture (OTA 81B, 82B, or 82C), or open or closed crush or blast injuries to the hindfoot or midfoot who underwent limb reconstruction or amputation from 2012 to 2017.
Outcome measurements and comparisons: Number of temporizing, definitive, and complication surgeries were compared by treatment and injury.
Results: 574 participants with 221 ankle and pilon, 140 talus and calcaneal, and 213 other foot injuries were followed for 18 months. The mean age was 38 (range 8-64) and 33% were female. Participants underwent reconstruction (n=472), primary amputation (n=76), and failed reconstruction followed by amputation (n=26). 841 temporizing, 958 definitive, and 501 complication surgeries were performed. The number of surgeries was highest for those who underwent failed reconstruction (mean 5.8, 95% CI: 4.9-6.8, range 3-13) compared to reconstruction (mean 3.8, 95% CI: 3.5-4.0, range 1-21), and primary amputation (mean 4.9, 95% CI: 4.3-5.5, range 2-14) (p<0.01). Those with ankle and pilon injuries required more surgeries (4.7, 95% CI: 4.3-5.1, range 1-21) than hindfoot (3.4, 95% CI: 3.0-3.7, range 1-10), and other foot injuries (3.7, 95% CI: 3.4-4.0, range 1-14) (p<0.01). The average participant would complete definitive treatment 23 days after their injury, and those who required surgery for a complication spent 41 days in the complication phase of treatment.
Conclusions: Patients with high-energy lower extremity trauma underwent nearly 4 surgeries over 3 weeks until completion of definitive treatment, regardless of whether they underwent limb reconstruction or amputation. Those with ankle or pilon injuries and failed reconstruction attempts experienced the most operations, and those with complications required over an additional month of surgical care. These data may inform a shared decision-making process around limb optimization.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.