泰勒图在人工晶体配方性能评价中的应用。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of refractive surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3928/1081597X-20241126-04
Bing Zhang
{"title":"泰勒图在人工晶体配方性能评价中的应用。","authors":"Bing Zhang","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20241126-04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To apply a new method, the Taylor Diagram, and a new concept, the centered root mean square error (cRMSE), in evaluating the performance of IOL formulas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The preoperative biometrics were measured with the IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec) and the postoperative spherical equivalent refraction (SER) was calculated in 888 anonymous patients. The Taylor Diagram was applied to visualize the centered root mean square error (cRMSE) and the correlation coefficient between the predictions and the observations (R<sub>po</sub>). Ten formulas across generations were optimized by zeroing the mean predictive error, including SRK I, SRK II, SRK/T, Holladay I, Hoffer-Q, Haigis, Barrett Universal II, VRF, EVO 2.0, and Næser 2. The RMSE and cRMSE at a range of IOL constants around the optimized constant were calculated for SRK/T, Holladay I, Hoffer-Q, and Haigis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Taylor Diagram showed improved performance of formulas across generations and the aggregations of the same-generation formulas. The SRK I performed worst with an RMSE of 0.819 and R<sub>po</sub> of 0.659, and the EVO 2.0 performed best with an RMSE of 0.341 and R<sub>po</sub> of 0.930. At a range of IOL constants, cRMSE is generally much closer to the optimized value than RMSE. At a relatively wide range of constant values, cRMSEs showed no significant discrepancy with the optimized value at the optimized constant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Taylor Diagram is a powerful tool for visualizing the performances of IOL formulas. Constant optimization is proved necessary. When the optimization is unavailable, cRMSE is a good approximation. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2025;41(1):e50-e55.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"41 1","pages":"e50-e55"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of the Taylor Diagram in Evaluating the Performance of IOL Formulas.\",\"authors\":\"Bing Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/1081597X-20241126-04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To apply a new method, the Taylor Diagram, and a new concept, the centered root mean square error (cRMSE), in evaluating the performance of IOL formulas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The preoperative biometrics were measured with the IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec) and the postoperative spherical equivalent refraction (SER) was calculated in 888 anonymous patients. The Taylor Diagram was applied to visualize the centered root mean square error (cRMSE) and the correlation coefficient between the predictions and the observations (R<sub>po</sub>). Ten formulas across generations were optimized by zeroing the mean predictive error, including SRK I, SRK II, SRK/T, Holladay I, Hoffer-Q, Haigis, Barrett Universal II, VRF, EVO 2.0, and Næser 2. The RMSE and cRMSE at a range of IOL constants around the optimized constant were calculated for SRK/T, Holladay I, Hoffer-Q, and Haigis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Taylor Diagram showed improved performance of formulas across generations and the aggregations of the same-generation formulas. The SRK I performed worst with an RMSE of 0.819 and R<sub>po</sub> of 0.659, and the EVO 2.0 performed best with an RMSE of 0.341 and R<sub>po</sub> of 0.930. At a range of IOL constants, cRMSE is generally much closer to the optimized value than RMSE. At a relatively wide range of constant values, cRMSEs showed no significant discrepancy with the optimized value at the optimized constant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Taylor Diagram is a powerful tool for visualizing the performances of IOL formulas. Constant optimization is proved necessary. When the optimization is unavailable, cRMSE is a good approximation. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2025;41(1):e50-e55.]</b>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"e50-e55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20241126-04\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20241126-04","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:应用泰勒图(Taylor Diagram)和中心均方根误差(cRMSE)的新概念评价人工晶状体配方的性能。方法:采用IOLMaster 700(卡尔蔡司mediitec)测量888例匿名患者术前生物特征,计算术后球等效屈光度(SER)。采用泰勒图来显示中心均方根误差(cRMSE)和预测与观测之间的相关系数(Rpo)。通过对SRK I、SRK II、SRK/T、Holladay I、Hoffer-Q、Haigis、Barrett Universal II、VRF、EVO 2.0、Næser 2等10个代间公式进行平均预测误差归零优化。计算SRK/T、Holladay I、hfer - q和Haigis在优化后的晶状体常数范围内的RMSE和cRMSE。结果:泰勒图显示了跨代公式和同代公式的聚合性能的提高。SRK I表现最差,RMSE为0.819,Rpo为0.659;EVO 2.0表现最好,RMSE为0.341,Rpo为0.930。在IOL常数范围内,cRMSE通常比RMSE更接近于优化值。在较宽的常数范围内,crmse与优化常数下的优化值没有显著差异。结论:泰勒图是可视化人工晶状体配方性能的有力工具。不断优化被证明是必要的。当优化不可用时,cRMSE是一个很好的近似值。[J].中华眼科杂志,2015;41(1):555 - 555。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Application of the Taylor Diagram in Evaluating the Performance of IOL Formulas.

Purpose: To apply a new method, the Taylor Diagram, and a new concept, the centered root mean square error (cRMSE), in evaluating the performance of IOL formulas.

Methods: The preoperative biometrics were measured with the IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec) and the postoperative spherical equivalent refraction (SER) was calculated in 888 anonymous patients. The Taylor Diagram was applied to visualize the centered root mean square error (cRMSE) and the correlation coefficient between the predictions and the observations (Rpo). Ten formulas across generations were optimized by zeroing the mean predictive error, including SRK I, SRK II, SRK/T, Holladay I, Hoffer-Q, Haigis, Barrett Universal II, VRF, EVO 2.0, and Næser 2. The RMSE and cRMSE at a range of IOL constants around the optimized constant were calculated for SRK/T, Holladay I, Hoffer-Q, and Haigis.

Results: The Taylor Diagram showed improved performance of formulas across generations and the aggregations of the same-generation formulas. The SRK I performed worst with an RMSE of 0.819 and Rpo of 0.659, and the EVO 2.0 performed best with an RMSE of 0.341 and Rpo of 0.930. At a range of IOL constants, cRMSE is generally much closer to the optimized value than RMSE. At a relatively wide range of constant values, cRMSEs showed no significant discrepancy with the optimized value at the optimized constant.

Conclusions: The Taylor Diagram is a powerful tool for visualizing the performances of IOL formulas. Constant optimization is proved necessary. When the optimization is unavailable, cRMSE is a good approximation. [J Refract Surg. 2025;41(1):e50-e55.].

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as: • Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics” • Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles • Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content • Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.
期刊最新文献
Visual and Safety Outcomes of Refractive Correction Procedures Following Lens Removal for Residual Refractive Error: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. 2024 Reviewers. A Nomogram to Improve the Predictability of High Myopic Astigmatism in Small Incision Lenticule Extraction Surgery. Application of the Taylor Diagram in Evaluating the Performance of IOL Formulas. Clarification of Femtosecond Laser Terminology: Energy, Fluence, Dose.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1