Simona Dianiskova, Roberto Rongo, Domenico Sirignano, Rosalinda D'Amelio, Giorgio Oliva, Rosa Valletta, Vincenzo D'Antò
{"title":"牙齿矫正器治疗中覆盖牙合复位和速度水平曲线的临床可预测性评估。","authors":"Simona Dianiskova, Roberto Rongo, Domenico Sirignano, Rosalinda D'Amelio, Giorgio Oliva, Rosa Valletta, Vincenzo D'Antò","doi":"10.1111/ocr.12894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This retrospective study aims to assess the predictability of Overbite (OVB) reduction and Curve of Spee (COS) levelling in patients with deep bite malocclusion treated with Clear Aligner Therapy (CAT). The research evaluates the accuracy of the prescribed movements in growing and non-growing patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty-six patients treated with Invisalign from January 2018 using SmartTrack were included. Digital models at pre-treatment, virtual plan and post-treatment phases were collected and analysed using Geomagic Control X. Accuracy was assessed for COS levelling, OVB reduction and individual tooth movements. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, paired t-tests and linear regression between accuracy of the movements and the age of the patient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found that the prescribed movements in ClinCheck often overestimated the achieved outcomes. The mean accuracy for COS levelling was 62%, and for OVB reduction, it was 61%. No significant association was observed between the accuracy and the age of the patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clear Aligner Therapy demonstrated moderate accuracy in achieving prescribed movements for COS levelling and OVB reduction. Clinicians should exercise caution in virtual treatment planning and may need to consider potential modifications to software projections to enhance desired outcomes. Further research comparing different aligner protocols and brands is warranted to advance understanding and improve treatment predictability.</p>","PeriodicalId":19652,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Clinical Predictability of Overbite Reduction and Curve of Spee Levelling in Clear Aligner Treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Simona Dianiskova, Roberto Rongo, Domenico Sirignano, Rosalinda D'Amelio, Giorgio Oliva, Rosa Valletta, Vincenzo D'Antò\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ocr.12894\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This retrospective study aims to assess the predictability of Overbite (OVB) reduction and Curve of Spee (COS) levelling in patients with deep bite malocclusion treated with Clear Aligner Therapy (CAT). The research evaluates the accuracy of the prescribed movements in growing and non-growing patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty-six patients treated with Invisalign from January 2018 using SmartTrack were included. Digital models at pre-treatment, virtual plan and post-treatment phases were collected and analysed using Geomagic Control X. Accuracy was assessed for COS levelling, OVB reduction and individual tooth movements. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, paired t-tests and linear regression between accuracy of the movements and the age of the patient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found that the prescribed movements in ClinCheck often overestimated the achieved outcomes. The mean accuracy for COS levelling was 62%, and for OVB reduction, it was 61%. No significant association was observed between the accuracy and the age of the patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clear Aligner Therapy demonstrated moderate accuracy in achieving prescribed movements for COS levelling and OVB reduction. Clinicians should exercise caution in virtual treatment planning and may need to consider potential modifications to software projections to enhance desired outcomes. Further research comparing different aligner protocols and brands is warranted to advance understanding and improve treatment predictability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12894\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12894","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本回顾性研究旨在评估使用透明矫正器治疗(CAT)的深咬合错患者复咬合(OVB)复位和速度曲线(COS)水平的可预测性。该研究评估了生长和非生长患者的规定动作的准确性。材料和方法:纳入2018年1月起使用SmartTrack使用Invisalign治疗的36例患者。使用Geomagic Control x收集治疗前、虚拟计划和治疗后阶段的数字模型并进行分析。评估COS水平、OVB复位和单个牙齿移动的准确性。统计分析包括描述性统计、配对t检验和运动准确度与患者年龄之间的线性回归。结果:研究发现ClinCheck中规定的动作往往高估了达到的效果。COS水平的平均准确度为62%,OVB降低的平均准确度为61%。没有观察到准确率与患者年龄之间的显著关联。结论:明确对准器治疗在实现COS水平和OVB降低的规定运动方面表现出中等的准确性。临床医生应谨慎对待虚拟治疗计划,并可能需要考虑对软件预测的潜在修改,以提高预期的结果。进一步的研究比较不同的矫正器方案和品牌是必要的,以促进了解和提高治疗的可预测性。
Assessment of Clinical Predictability of Overbite Reduction and Curve of Spee Levelling in Clear Aligner Treatment.
Objective: This retrospective study aims to assess the predictability of Overbite (OVB) reduction and Curve of Spee (COS) levelling in patients with deep bite malocclusion treated with Clear Aligner Therapy (CAT). The research evaluates the accuracy of the prescribed movements in growing and non-growing patients.
Materials and methods: Thirty-six patients treated with Invisalign from January 2018 using SmartTrack were included. Digital models at pre-treatment, virtual plan and post-treatment phases were collected and analysed using Geomagic Control X. Accuracy was assessed for COS levelling, OVB reduction and individual tooth movements. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, paired t-tests and linear regression between accuracy of the movements and the age of the patient.
Results: The study found that the prescribed movements in ClinCheck often overestimated the achieved outcomes. The mean accuracy for COS levelling was 62%, and for OVB reduction, it was 61%. No significant association was observed between the accuracy and the age of the patient.
Conclusion: Clear Aligner Therapy demonstrated moderate accuracy in achieving prescribed movements for COS levelling and OVB reduction. Clinicians should exercise caution in virtual treatment planning and may need to consider potential modifications to software projections to enhance desired outcomes. Further research comparing different aligner protocols and brands is warranted to advance understanding and improve treatment predictability.
期刊介绍:
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research - Genes, Growth and Development is published to serve its readers as an international forum for the presentation and critical discussion of issues pertinent to the advancement of the specialty of orthodontics and the evidence-based knowledge of craniofacial growth and development. This forum is based on scientifically supported information, but also includes minority and conflicting opinions.
The objective of the journal is to facilitate effective communication between the research community and practicing clinicians. Original papers of high scientific quality that report the findings of clinical trials, clinical epidemiology, and novel therapeutic or diagnostic approaches are appropriate submissions. Similarly, we welcome papers in genetics, developmental biology, syndromology, surgery, speech and hearing, and other biomedical disciplines related to clinical orthodontics and normal and abnormal craniofacial growth and development. In addition to original and basic research, the journal publishes concise reviews, case reports of substantial value, invited essays, letters, and announcements.
The journal is published quarterly. The review of submitted papers will be coordinated by the editor and members of the editorial board. It is policy to review manuscripts within 3 to 4 weeks of receipt and to publish within 3 to 6 months of acceptance.