涉及神经轴路的抗生素给药事件的系统综述:临床分析、影响因素和预防方法。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pain and Therapy Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1007/s40122-024-00701-7
Santosh Patel
{"title":"涉及神经轴路的抗生素给药事件的系统综述:临床分析、影响因素和预防方法。","authors":"Santosh Patel","doi":"10.1007/s40122-024-00701-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This review aimed to investigate the inadvertent administration of antibiotics via epidural and intrathecal routes. The secondary objective was to identify the contributing human and systemic factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar databases were searched for the last five decades (1973-2023). The author recorded the antibiotics involved, the route of administration, clinical details and consequences in a standardised format. The author utilized the Human Factors Analysis Classification System (HFACS) framework to identify contributing factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty publications reported neuraxial administration of antibiotics (adults, 19, paediatric, three patients). Fifteen (of 22) incidents happened in the post-surgical or post-chronic pain procedure period. Most errors (14 of 22) occurred via the epidural route. Cefazolin (six) and gentamicin (five) were the most common among 13 antibiotics involved. Intrathecal cephalosporin incidents (n = 6) were associated with devastating consequences (death, one, permanent residual neurological deficits, three). In the unsafe act category of the HFACS, the perceptual error contributing to occurrences of neuraxial antibiotics administration errors was due to IV-neuraxial device (e.g. intrathecal drain or catheter, epidural catheter) confusion (eight patients) or syringe/infusion bag swap (nine patients).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intrathecal cephalosporins and gentamicin administration are associated with devastating consequences. Prevention of neuraxial antibiotic administration requires improvements in clinical deficiencies and the implementation of supporting technological tools to prepare and administer antibiotics correctly, thereby ensuring patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Review of Antibiotic Administration Incidents Involving Neuraxial Routes: Clinical Analysis, Contributing Factors and Prevention Approaches.\",\"authors\":\"Santosh Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40122-024-00701-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This review aimed to investigate the inadvertent administration of antibiotics via epidural and intrathecal routes. The secondary objective was to identify the contributing human and systemic factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar databases were searched for the last five decades (1973-2023). The author recorded the antibiotics involved, the route of administration, clinical details and consequences in a standardised format. The author utilized the Human Factors Analysis Classification System (HFACS) framework to identify contributing factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty publications reported neuraxial administration of antibiotics (adults, 19, paediatric, three patients). Fifteen (of 22) incidents happened in the post-surgical or post-chronic pain procedure period. Most errors (14 of 22) occurred via the epidural route. Cefazolin (six) and gentamicin (five) were the most common among 13 antibiotics involved. Intrathecal cephalosporin incidents (n = 6) were associated with devastating consequences (death, one, permanent residual neurological deficits, three). In the unsafe act category of the HFACS, the perceptual error contributing to occurrences of neuraxial antibiotics administration errors was due to IV-neuraxial device (e.g. intrathecal drain or catheter, epidural catheter) confusion (eight patients) or syringe/infusion bag swap (nine patients).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intrathecal cephalosporins and gentamicin administration are associated with devastating consequences. Prevention of neuraxial antibiotic administration requires improvements in clinical deficiencies and the implementation of supporting technological tools to prepare and administer antibiotics correctly, thereby ensuring patient safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain and Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-024-00701-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-024-00701-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:本综述旨在调查无意中通过硬膜外和鞘内途径给药的抗生素。次要目标是确定人为因素和系统因素。方法:检索近50年(1973-2023)PubMed、Scopus和谷歌Scholar数据库。作者以标准化格式记录了所涉及的抗生素、给药途径、临床细节和后果。作者利用人因分析分类系统(HFACS)框架来识别影响因素。结果:20篇出版物报道了轴向给药抗生素(成人19例,儿科3例)。22例中有15例发生在手术后或慢性疼痛后手术期间。大多数错误(22例中的14例)发生在硬膜外路径。在13种抗生素中,头孢唑林(6种)和庆大霉素(5种)最为常见。鞘内注射头孢菌素事件(n = 6)与破坏性后果(死亡1例,永久性残余神经功能缺损3例)相关。在HFACS的不安全行为类别中,导致轴向抗生素给药错误发生的感知错误是由于iv -轴向装置(如鞘内引流或导管、硬膜外导管)混淆(8例)或注射器/输液袋调换(9例)。结论:鞘内注射头孢菌素和庆大霉素具有破坏性后果。预防轴向抗生素给药需要改善临床缺陷,并实施支持性技术工具,以正确制备和给药抗生素,从而确保患者安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Systematic Review of Antibiotic Administration Incidents Involving Neuraxial Routes: Clinical Analysis, Contributing Factors and Prevention Approaches.

Introduction: This review aimed to investigate the inadvertent administration of antibiotics via epidural and intrathecal routes. The secondary objective was to identify the contributing human and systemic factors.

Methods: PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar databases were searched for the last five decades (1973-2023). The author recorded the antibiotics involved, the route of administration, clinical details and consequences in a standardised format. The author utilized the Human Factors Analysis Classification System (HFACS) framework to identify contributing factors.

Results: Twenty publications reported neuraxial administration of antibiotics (adults, 19, paediatric, three patients). Fifteen (of 22) incidents happened in the post-surgical or post-chronic pain procedure period. Most errors (14 of 22) occurred via the epidural route. Cefazolin (six) and gentamicin (five) were the most common among 13 antibiotics involved. Intrathecal cephalosporin incidents (n = 6) were associated with devastating consequences (death, one, permanent residual neurological deficits, three). In the unsafe act category of the HFACS, the perceptual error contributing to occurrences of neuraxial antibiotics administration errors was due to IV-neuraxial device (e.g. intrathecal drain or catheter, epidural catheter) confusion (eight patients) or syringe/infusion bag swap (nine patients).

Conclusions: Intrathecal cephalosporins and gentamicin administration are associated with devastating consequences. Prevention of neuraxial antibiotic administration requires improvements in clinical deficiencies and the implementation of supporting technological tools to prepare and administer antibiotics correctly, thereby ensuring patient safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain and Therapy
Pain and Therapy CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
110
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of pain therapies and pain-related devices. Studies relating to diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. Areas of focus include, but are not limited to, acute pain, cancer pain, chronic pain, headache and migraine, neuropathic pain, opioids, palliative care and pain ethics, peri- and post-operative pain as well as rheumatic pain and fibromyalgia. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of pharmaceutical and healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, case reports, trial protocols, short communications such as commentaries and editorials, and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from around the world. Pain and Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Real‑World Evidence of the Safety and Effectiveness of Atogepant Added to OnabotulinumtoxinA for the Preventive Treatment of Chronic Migraine: A Retrospective Chart Review. Current and Novel Therapies for Cluster Headache: A Narrative Review. Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy versus Coblation Nucleoplasty Combined with Collagenase Chemonucleolysis for Lumbar Disc Herniation with Grade I Degenerative Spondylolisthesis. Mechanisms and Therapeutic Potential of GPX4 in Pain Modulation. The Impact of ERAS and Multidisciplinary Teams on Perioperative Management in Colorectal Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1