公众对复发性尿路感染在线信息的兴趣最大的是出版质量最差的信息。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY Pathogens Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.3390/pathogens13121125
Sapna Thaker, Justin Y H Chan, Karan N Thaker, Rebecca A Takele, Abigail F Newlands, Kayleigh Maxwell, Yasin Bhanji, Melissa Kramer, Kymora B Scotland
{"title":"公众对复发性尿路感染在线信息的兴趣最大的是出版质量最差的信息。","authors":"Sapna Thaker, Justin Y H Chan, Karan N Thaker, Rebecca A Takele, Abigail F Newlands, Kayleigh Maxwell, Yasin Bhanji, Melissa Kramer, Kymora B Scotland","doi":"10.3390/pathogens13121125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background</i>: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most prevalent bacterial infections. With many patients turning to the Internet as a health resource, this study seeks to understand public engagement with online resources concerning recurrent UTIs (rUTIs), assess their reliability, and identify common questions/concerns about rUTIs. <i>Methods</i>: Social media analysis tool BuzzSumo was used to calculate online engagement (likes, shares, comments, views) with information on rUTIs. The reliability of highly engaged articles was evaluated using the DISCERN questionnaire. Highly engaged categories were entered as keywords in Google Trends to quantify search interest. To categorize patient-specific concerns, a database containing anonymously collected patient questions about rUTIs was created. <i>Results</i>: BuzzSumo revealed four search categories: general information, treatment, causes, and herbal remedies. DISCERN scores indicated moderate reliability overall; however, the \"herbal remedies\" category demonstrated poor reliability despite high engagement. Google Trends analysis highlighted \"causes\" and \"treatment\" searches as highest in relative interest. The 10 most popular categories of concern were antibiotics, microbiome, vaccines, prevention, pelvic pain, sex, testing, symptoms, diet/lifestyle, and hormones. <i>Conclusions</i>: People living with rUTIs demonstrate key concerns and often seek information online, yet articles with high engagement often contain unreliable information. Healthcare professionals may consider counteracting misinformation by providing evidence-based information online about rUTIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19758,"journal":{"name":"Pathogens","volume":"13 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11679484/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public Interest in Online Information on Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections Is Greatest for Information with the Poorest Publication Quality.\",\"authors\":\"Sapna Thaker, Justin Y H Chan, Karan N Thaker, Rebecca A Takele, Abigail F Newlands, Kayleigh Maxwell, Yasin Bhanji, Melissa Kramer, Kymora B Scotland\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/pathogens13121125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Background</i>: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most prevalent bacterial infections. With many patients turning to the Internet as a health resource, this study seeks to understand public engagement with online resources concerning recurrent UTIs (rUTIs), assess their reliability, and identify common questions/concerns about rUTIs. <i>Methods</i>: Social media analysis tool BuzzSumo was used to calculate online engagement (likes, shares, comments, views) with information on rUTIs. The reliability of highly engaged articles was evaluated using the DISCERN questionnaire. Highly engaged categories were entered as keywords in Google Trends to quantify search interest. To categorize patient-specific concerns, a database containing anonymously collected patient questions about rUTIs was created. <i>Results</i>: BuzzSumo revealed four search categories: general information, treatment, causes, and herbal remedies. DISCERN scores indicated moderate reliability overall; however, the \\\"herbal remedies\\\" category demonstrated poor reliability despite high engagement. Google Trends analysis highlighted \\\"causes\\\" and \\\"treatment\\\" searches as highest in relative interest. The 10 most popular categories of concern were antibiotics, microbiome, vaccines, prevention, pelvic pain, sex, testing, symptoms, diet/lifestyle, and hormones. <i>Conclusions</i>: People living with rUTIs demonstrate key concerns and often seek information online, yet articles with high engagement often contain unreliable information. Healthcare professionals may consider counteracting misinformation by providing evidence-based information online about rUTIs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pathogens\",\"volume\":\"13 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11679484/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pathogens\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13121125\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathogens","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13121125","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尿路感染是最常见的细菌感染之一。随着许多患者转向互联网作为健康资源,本研究旨在了解公众对复发性尿路感染(rUTIs)在线资源的参与情况,评估其可靠性,并确定关于rUTIs的常见问题/关注点。方法:使用社交媒体分析工具BuzzSumo计算ruti信息的在线参与度(点赞、分享、评论、观看)。高参与度文章的可靠性评估使用辨别问卷。在b谷歌Trends中,高参与度的类别被作为关键字输入,以量化搜索兴趣。为了对患者具体关注的问题进行分类,创建了一个包含匿名收集的关于ruti的患者问题的数据库。结果:BuzzSumo显示了四个搜索类别:一般信息,治疗,原因和草药疗法。总体而言,DISCERN分数显示中等信度;然而,“草药”类别显示出较差的可靠性,尽管参与度很高。谷歌趋势分析显示,“病因”和“治疗”是人们最感兴趣的搜索词。最受关注的10个类别是抗生素、微生物组、疫苗、预防、盆腔疼痛、性别、检查、症状、饮食/生活方式和激素。结论:ruti患者表现出关键的担忧,经常在网上寻找信息,然而高参与度的文章往往包含不可靠的信息。医疗保健专业人员可考虑通过在网上提供有关ruti的循证信息来消除错误信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Public Interest in Online Information on Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections Is Greatest for Information with the Poorest Publication Quality.

Background: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most prevalent bacterial infections. With many patients turning to the Internet as a health resource, this study seeks to understand public engagement with online resources concerning recurrent UTIs (rUTIs), assess their reliability, and identify common questions/concerns about rUTIs. Methods: Social media analysis tool BuzzSumo was used to calculate online engagement (likes, shares, comments, views) with information on rUTIs. The reliability of highly engaged articles was evaluated using the DISCERN questionnaire. Highly engaged categories were entered as keywords in Google Trends to quantify search interest. To categorize patient-specific concerns, a database containing anonymously collected patient questions about rUTIs was created. Results: BuzzSumo revealed four search categories: general information, treatment, causes, and herbal remedies. DISCERN scores indicated moderate reliability overall; however, the "herbal remedies" category demonstrated poor reliability despite high engagement. Google Trends analysis highlighted "causes" and "treatment" searches as highest in relative interest. The 10 most popular categories of concern were antibiotics, microbiome, vaccines, prevention, pelvic pain, sex, testing, symptoms, diet/lifestyle, and hormones. Conclusions: People living with rUTIs demonstrate key concerns and often seek information online, yet articles with high engagement often contain unreliable information. Healthcare professionals may consider counteracting misinformation by providing evidence-based information online about rUTIs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pathogens
Pathogens Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
1285
审稿时长
17.75 days
期刊介绍: Pathogens (ISSN 2076-0817) publishes reviews, regular research papers and short notes on all aspects of pathogens and pathogen-host interactions. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodical details must be provided for research articles.
期刊最新文献
Antibiotic Resistance Trends in Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens and Eight-Year Surveillance of XDR Bloodstream Infections in a Western Greece Tertiary Hospital. Asymptomatic Malaria Cases and Plasmodium Species in Mainland Tanzania and Zanzibar Archipelago (Pemba). Deletion of gE in Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Leads to Increased Extracellular Virus Production and Augmented Interferon Alpha Production by Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells. Enhancement of Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Specific CD8+ T Cell Responses with TIGIT Blockade Involves Trogocytosis. Novel Antigenic Variant Infectious Bursal Disease Virus Outbreaks in Japan from 2014 to 2023 and Characterization of an Isolate from Chicken.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1