急诊儿科患者插管后镇静:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pediatric emergency care Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000003325
Emily Wynia, Kevin Baumgartner, Lauren H Yaeger, Rachel Ancona, Susan Wiltrakis, Brian M Fuller
{"title":"急诊儿科患者插管后镇静:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Emily Wynia, Kevin Baumgartner, Lauren H Yaeger, Rachel Ancona, Susan Wiltrakis, Brian M Fuller","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Postintubation sedation is a critical intervention for patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. Research in the intensive care unit (ICU) and adult emergency department (ED) demonstrates that appropriate postintubation sedation has a significant impact on patient outcomes. There are minimal published data regarding postintubation sedation for pediatric ED patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify, describe, and critique published literature on postintubation sedation in pediatric ED patients.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Embase, Ovid Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and ClinicalTrials.Gov.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Studies describing postintubation sedation in the ED for pediatric patients (<18 years of age) intubated in the ED via rapid sequence intubation (RSI) were included. Studies reporting intubation outside the ED, intubation not by RSI, or nonpediatric patients were excluded, as were studies not reporting novel human clinical research.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Data were abstracted by 2 authors using a standardized worksheet. Data included study design & setting, demographics, medications for RSI and postintubation sedation, administration of any or appropriately timed postintubation sedation, and predictive factors for postintubation sedation-related outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10 studies were included, all of which were nonrandomized; there was significant heterogeneity and many key variables and outcomes were not consistently reported. Meta-analysis of eligible studies demonstrated pooled estimates of 77.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 62.5-92.0) for proportion of patients receiving any postintubation sedation, 43.5% (95% CI: 29.3-57.6) for proportion of patients receiving appropriately timed postintubation sedation, and 18.6 minutes (95% CI: 12.5-24.7) for median time to postintubation sedation, all with significant heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Data on postintubation sedation in pediatric ED patients are limited. Administration of postintubation sedation is inconsistent and may be substantially delayed. Further high-quality research into the use of postintubation sedation in this setting is needed, and appropriate postintubation sedation should be a target for quality improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postintubation Sedation of Pediatric Patients in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Emily Wynia, Kevin Baumgartner, Lauren H Yaeger, Rachel Ancona, Susan Wiltrakis, Brian M Fuller\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Postintubation sedation is a critical intervention for patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. Research in the intensive care unit (ICU) and adult emergency department (ED) demonstrates that appropriate postintubation sedation has a significant impact on patient outcomes. There are minimal published data regarding postintubation sedation for pediatric ED patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify, describe, and critique published literature on postintubation sedation in pediatric ED patients.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Embase, Ovid Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and ClinicalTrials.Gov.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Studies describing postintubation sedation in the ED for pediatric patients (<18 years of age) intubated in the ED via rapid sequence intubation (RSI) were included. Studies reporting intubation outside the ED, intubation not by RSI, or nonpediatric patients were excluded, as were studies not reporting novel human clinical research.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Data were abstracted by 2 authors using a standardized worksheet. Data included study design & setting, demographics, medications for RSI and postintubation sedation, administration of any or appropriately timed postintubation sedation, and predictive factors for postintubation sedation-related outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10 studies were included, all of which were nonrandomized; there was significant heterogeneity and many key variables and outcomes were not consistently reported. Meta-analysis of eligible studies demonstrated pooled estimates of 77.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 62.5-92.0) for proportion of patients receiving any postintubation sedation, 43.5% (95% CI: 29.3-57.6) for proportion of patients receiving appropriately timed postintubation sedation, and 18.6 minutes (95% CI: 12.5-24.7) for median time to postintubation sedation, all with significant heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Data on postintubation sedation in pediatric ED patients are limited. Administration of postintubation sedation is inconsistent and may be substantially delayed. Further high-quality research into the use of postintubation sedation in this setting is needed, and appropriate postintubation sedation should be a target for quality improvement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric emergency care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric emergency care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003325\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003325","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:插管后镇静是机械通气患者的关键干预措施。重症监护病房(ICU)和成人急诊科(ED)的研究表明,适当的插管后镇静对患者预后有显著影响。关于小儿急诊科患者插管后镇静的公开数据很少。目的:识别、描述和评价已发表的关于儿科急诊科患者插管后镇静的文献。数据来源:Embase、Ovid Medline、Scopus、Cochrane中央对照试验登记册、Cochrane系统评价数据库和临床试验。研究选择:描述儿科急诊科患者插管后镇静的研究(数据提取:数据由2位作者使用标准化工作表提取。数据包括研究设计和设置、人口统计学、治疗RSI和插管后镇静的药物、任何或适当时间的插管后镇静的管理,以及插管后镇静相关结果的预测因素。结果:共纳入10项研究,均为非随机;有显著的异质性,许多关键变量和结果没有一致的报道。对符合条件的研究的荟萃分析显示,接受任何插管后镇静的患者比例为77.3%(95%可信区间[CI]: 62.5-92.0),接受适当时间插管后镇静的患者比例为43.5% (95% CI: 29.3-57.6),插管后镇静的中位时间为18.6分钟(95% CI: 12.5-24.7),均存在显著的异质性。结论:关于儿科急诊科患者插管后镇静的数据有限。插管后镇静的管理是不一致的,可能会大大延迟。需要对这种情况下插管后镇静的使用进行进一步的高质量研究,适当的插管后镇静应该是质量改进的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Postintubation Sedation of Pediatric Patients in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Context: Postintubation sedation is a critical intervention for patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. Research in the intensive care unit (ICU) and adult emergency department (ED) demonstrates that appropriate postintubation sedation has a significant impact on patient outcomes. There are minimal published data regarding postintubation sedation for pediatric ED patients.

Objective: To identify, describe, and critique published literature on postintubation sedation in pediatric ED patients.

Data sources: Embase, Ovid Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and ClinicalTrials.Gov.

Study selection: Studies describing postintubation sedation in the ED for pediatric patients (<18 years of age) intubated in the ED via rapid sequence intubation (RSI) were included. Studies reporting intubation outside the ED, intubation not by RSI, or nonpediatric patients were excluded, as were studies not reporting novel human clinical research.

Data extraction: Data were abstracted by 2 authors using a standardized worksheet. Data included study design & setting, demographics, medications for RSI and postintubation sedation, administration of any or appropriately timed postintubation sedation, and predictive factors for postintubation sedation-related outcomes.

Results: A total of 10 studies were included, all of which were nonrandomized; there was significant heterogeneity and many key variables and outcomes were not consistently reported. Meta-analysis of eligible studies demonstrated pooled estimates of 77.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 62.5-92.0) for proportion of patients receiving any postintubation sedation, 43.5% (95% CI: 29.3-57.6) for proportion of patients receiving appropriately timed postintubation sedation, and 18.6 minutes (95% CI: 12.5-24.7) for median time to postintubation sedation, all with significant heterogeneity.

Conclusions: Data on postintubation sedation in pediatric ED patients are limited. Administration of postintubation sedation is inconsistent and may be substantially delayed. Further high-quality research into the use of postintubation sedation in this setting is needed, and appropriate postintubation sedation should be a target for quality improvement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
期刊最新文献
Does Virtual Interviewing Provide the Information for a Satisfactory Rank Decision?: A Perspective From the Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellowship Interviews. Pharmacotherapy for Agitation Management in a Pediatric Emergency Department. Procedural Entrustment Alignment Between Pediatric Residents and Their Preceptors in the Pediatric Emergency Department. A National Survey of Caregiver Needs and Experiences When Attending the Emergency Department. A Qualitative Assessment of Barriers, Facilitators, and Outcomes in a Simulation-Based Collaborative Quality Improvement Program: The ImPACTS Project.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1