基于模拟的协作质量改进计划中障碍、促进因素和结果的定性评估:影响项目。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pediatric emergency care Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000003321
Michelle J Alletag, Shruti Kant, Wendy L Van Ittersum, Theresa A Walls, Erin E Montgomery, Hannah L Anderson, Mark S Mannenbach, Marc A Auerbach
{"title":"基于模拟的协作质量改进计划中障碍、促进因素和结果的定性评估:影响项目。","authors":"Michelle J Alletag, Shruti Kant, Wendy L Van Ittersum, Theresa A Walls, Erin E Montgomery, Hannah L Anderson, Mark S Mannenbach, Marc A Auerbach","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>ImPACTS (Improving Acute Care Through Simulation) is a collaborative simulation-based program partnering pediatric specialty centers (\"hubs\") with general emergency departments (GEDs) to improve pediatric acute care. Objective measurements of ImPACTS, such as evaluating Pediatric Readiness Score (PRS) and simulation-based outcome improvements, have been reported previously. Barriers to and facilitators of program involvement and the downstream effects of the program have not been previously described. This study explores these aspects and key drivers for successful collaboration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors performed open coding of semistructured interviews of hub team members and pediatric emergency care coordinators (PECCs) from community GED \"spokes.\" We then identified and explored themes within the categories of barriers to, facilitators of, and barrier mitigation strategies for successful partnerships from the perspectives of both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis generated 4 dominant themes: buy-in, communication, personnel, and logistics. Engagement, institutional support, and buy-in of site leaders and individual participants were crucial to successful implementation, without which the programs were not completed or never started. Hubs benefited from project involvement via increased local engagement in pediatric readiness, organizational support, and further buy-in from institutional leadership, allowing for the future continuation of ImPACTS and similar programs. Benefits experienced by GEDs impacted education, pediatric readiness, and clinical and financial partnerships across institutions. Additionally, spoke interviewees cited downstream effects of participation, including increased collaboration and improved relationships with hub sites as being the most impactful.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Understanding the key drivers of all collaborators is instrumental in successfully implementing large-scale educational and quality initiatives like the ImPACTS program.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Qualitative Assessment of Barriers, Facilitators, and Outcomes in a Simulation-Based Collaborative Quality Improvement Program: The ImPACTS Project.\",\"authors\":\"Michelle J Alletag, Shruti Kant, Wendy L Van Ittersum, Theresa A Walls, Erin E Montgomery, Hannah L Anderson, Mark S Mannenbach, Marc A Auerbach\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>ImPACTS (Improving Acute Care Through Simulation) is a collaborative simulation-based program partnering pediatric specialty centers (\\\"hubs\\\") with general emergency departments (GEDs) to improve pediatric acute care. Objective measurements of ImPACTS, such as evaluating Pediatric Readiness Score (PRS) and simulation-based outcome improvements, have been reported previously. Barriers to and facilitators of program involvement and the downstream effects of the program have not been previously described. This study explores these aspects and key drivers for successful collaboration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors performed open coding of semistructured interviews of hub team members and pediatric emergency care coordinators (PECCs) from community GED \\\"spokes.\\\" We then identified and explored themes within the categories of barriers to, facilitators of, and barrier mitigation strategies for successful partnerships from the perspectives of both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis generated 4 dominant themes: buy-in, communication, personnel, and logistics. Engagement, institutional support, and buy-in of site leaders and individual participants were crucial to successful implementation, without which the programs were not completed or never started. Hubs benefited from project involvement via increased local engagement in pediatric readiness, organizational support, and further buy-in from institutional leadership, allowing for the future continuation of ImPACTS and similar programs. Benefits experienced by GEDs impacted education, pediatric readiness, and clinical and financial partnerships across institutions. Additionally, spoke interviewees cited downstream effects of participation, including increased collaboration and improved relationships with hub sites as being the most impactful.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Understanding the key drivers of all collaborators is instrumental in successfully implementing large-scale educational and quality initiatives like the ImPACTS program.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric emergency care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric emergency care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003321\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003321","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:impact(通过模拟改善急症护理)是一个基于协作模拟的项目,将儿科专科中心(“中心”)与普通急诊科(GEDs)合作,以改善儿科急症护理。影响的客观测量,如评估儿科准备评分(PRS)和基于模拟的结果改善,以前已经报道过。计划参与的障碍和促进因素以及计划的下游影响之前没有被描述过。本研究探讨了成功合作的这些方面和关键驱动因素。方法:作者对来自社区GED“辐条”的中心团队成员和儿科急诊协调员(pecc)的半结构化访谈进行了开放编码。然后,我们从两个群体的角度确定并探讨了成功伙伴关系的障碍、促进因素和障碍缓解战略类别中的主题。结果:分析产生了4个主要主题:购买,沟通,人员和后勤。参与、机构支持、现场领导和个人参与者的支持对成功实施至关重要,没有这些,项目就不会完成或从未开始。中心受益于项目的参与,包括提高当地对儿科准备工作的参与度、组织支持以及机构领导层的进一步支持,从而使影响和类似项目在未来得以延续。普通教育证书带来的好处影响了教育、儿科准备以及各机构之间的临床和金融伙伴关系。此外,受访者还提到了参与的下游效应,包括加强协作和改善与中心站点的关系,这是最具影响力的。结论:了解所有合作者的关键驱动因素对于成功实施影响项目等大规模教育和质量倡议至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Qualitative Assessment of Barriers, Facilitators, and Outcomes in a Simulation-Based Collaborative Quality Improvement Program: The ImPACTS Project.

Objectives: ImPACTS (Improving Acute Care Through Simulation) is a collaborative simulation-based program partnering pediatric specialty centers ("hubs") with general emergency departments (GEDs) to improve pediatric acute care. Objective measurements of ImPACTS, such as evaluating Pediatric Readiness Score (PRS) and simulation-based outcome improvements, have been reported previously. Barriers to and facilitators of program involvement and the downstream effects of the program have not been previously described. This study explores these aspects and key drivers for successful collaboration.

Methods: The authors performed open coding of semistructured interviews of hub team members and pediatric emergency care coordinators (PECCs) from community GED "spokes." We then identified and explored themes within the categories of barriers to, facilitators of, and barrier mitigation strategies for successful partnerships from the perspectives of both groups.

Results: Analysis generated 4 dominant themes: buy-in, communication, personnel, and logistics. Engagement, institutional support, and buy-in of site leaders and individual participants were crucial to successful implementation, without which the programs were not completed or never started. Hubs benefited from project involvement via increased local engagement in pediatric readiness, organizational support, and further buy-in from institutional leadership, allowing for the future continuation of ImPACTS and similar programs. Benefits experienced by GEDs impacted education, pediatric readiness, and clinical and financial partnerships across institutions. Additionally, spoke interviewees cited downstream effects of participation, including increased collaboration and improved relationships with hub sites as being the most impactful.

Conclusion: Understanding the key drivers of all collaborators is instrumental in successfully implementing large-scale educational and quality initiatives like the ImPACTS program.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
期刊最新文献
Does Virtual Interviewing Provide the Information for a Satisfactory Rank Decision?: A Perspective From the Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellowship Interviews. Pharmacotherapy for Agitation Management in a Pediatric Emergency Department. Procedural Entrustment Alignment Between Pediatric Residents and Their Preceptors in the Pediatric Emergency Department. A National Survey of Caregiver Needs and Experiences When Attending the Emergency Department. A Qualitative Assessment of Barriers, Facilitators, and Outcomes in a Simulation-Based Collaborative Quality Improvement Program: The ImPACTS Project.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1