Michelle J Alletag, Shruti Kant, Wendy L Van Ittersum, Theresa A Walls, Erin E Montgomery, Hannah L Anderson, Mark S Mannenbach, Marc A Auerbach
{"title":"基于模拟的协作质量改进计划中障碍、促进因素和结果的定性评估:影响项目。","authors":"Michelle J Alletag, Shruti Kant, Wendy L Van Ittersum, Theresa A Walls, Erin E Montgomery, Hannah L Anderson, Mark S Mannenbach, Marc A Auerbach","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>ImPACTS (Improving Acute Care Through Simulation) is a collaborative simulation-based program partnering pediatric specialty centers (\"hubs\") with general emergency departments (GEDs) to improve pediatric acute care. Objective measurements of ImPACTS, such as evaluating Pediatric Readiness Score (PRS) and simulation-based outcome improvements, have been reported previously. Barriers to and facilitators of program involvement and the downstream effects of the program have not been previously described. This study explores these aspects and key drivers for successful collaboration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors performed open coding of semistructured interviews of hub team members and pediatric emergency care coordinators (PECCs) from community GED \"spokes.\" We then identified and explored themes within the categories of barriers to, facilitators of, and barrier mitigation strategies for successful partnerships from the perspectives of both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis generated 4 dominant themes: buy-in, communication, personnel, and logistics. Engagement, institutional support, and buy-in of site leaders and individual participants were crucial to successful implementation, without which the programs were not completed or never started. Hubs benefited from project involvement via increased local engagement in pediatric readiness, organizational support, and further buy-in from institutional leadership, allowing for the future continuation of ImPACTS and similar programs. Benefits experienced by GEDs impacted education, pediatric readiness, and clinical and financial partnerships across institutions. Additionally, spoke interviewees cited downstream effects of participation, including increased collaboration and improved relationships with hub sites as being the most impactful.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Understanding the key drivers of all collaborators is instrumental in successfully implementing large-scale educational and quality initiatives like the ImPACTS program.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Qualitative Assessment of Barriers, Facilitators, and Outcomes in a Simulation-Based Collaborative Quality Improvement Program: The ImPACTS Project.\",\"authors\":\"Michelle J Alletag, Shruti Kant, Wendy L Van Ittersum, Theresa A Walls, Erin E Montgomery, Hannah L Anderson, Mark S Mannenbach, Marc A Auerbach\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>ImPACTS (Improving Acute Care Through Simulation) is a collaborative simulation-based program partnering pediatric specialty centers (\\\"hubs\\\") with general emergency departments (GEDs) to improve pediatric acute care. Objective measurements of ImPACTS, such as evaluating Pediatric Readiness Score (PRS) and simulation-based outcome improvements, have been reported previously. Barriers to and facilitators of program involvement and the downstream effects of the program have not been previously described. This study explores these aspects and key drivers for successful collaboration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors performed open coding of semistructured interviews of hub team members and pediatric emergency care coordinators (PECCs) from community GED \\\"spokes.\\\" We then identified and explored themes within the categories of barriers to, facilitators of, and barrier mitigation strategies for successful partnerships from the perspectives of both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis generated 4 dominant themes: buy-in, communication, personnel, and logistics. Engagement, institutional support, and buy-in of site leaders and individual participants were crucial to successful implementation, without which the programs were not completed or never started. Hubs benefited from project involvement via increased local engagement in pediatric readiness, organizational support, and further buy-in from institutional leadership, allowing for the future continuation of ImPACTS and similar programs. Benefits experienced by GEDs impacted education, pediatric readiness, and clinical and financial partnerships across institutions. Additionally, spoke interviewees cited downstream effects of participation, including increased collaboration and improved relationships with hub sites as being the most impactful.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Understanding the key drivers of all collaborators is instrumental in successfully implementing large-scale educational and quality initiatives like the ImPACTS program.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric emergency care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric emergency care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003321\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003321","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Qualitative Assessment of Barriers, Facilitators, and Outcomes in a Simulation-Based Collaborative Quality Improvement Program: The ImPACTS Project.
Objectives: ImPACTS (Improving Acute Care Through Simulation) is a collaborative simulation-based program partnering pediatric specialty centers ("hubs") with general emergency departments (GEDs) to improve pediatric acute care. Objective measurements of ImPACTS, such as evaluating Pediatric Readiness Score (PRS) and simulation-based outcome improvements, have been reported previously. Barriers to and facilitators of program involvement and the downstream effects of the program have not been previously described. This study explores these aspects and key drivers for successful collaboration.
Methods: The authors performed open coding of semistructured interviews of hub team members and pediatric emergency care coordinators (PECCs) from community GED "spokes." We then identified and explored themes within the categories of barriers to, facilitators of, and barrier mitigation strategies for successful partnerships from the perspectives of both groups.
Results: Analysis generated 4 dominant themes: buy-in, communication, personnel, and logistics. Engagement, institutional support, and buy-in of site leaders and individual participants were crucial to successful implementation, without which the programs were not completed or never started. Hubs benefited from project involvement via increased local engagement in pediatric readiness, organizational support, and further buy-in from institutional leadership, allowing for the future continuation of ImPACTS and similar programs. Benefits experienced by GEDs impacted education, pediatric readiness, and clinical and financial partnerships across institutions. Additionally, spoke interviewees cited downstream effects of participation, including increased collaboration and improved relationships with hub sites as being the most impactful.
Conclusion: Understanding the key drivers of all collaborators is instrumental in successfully implementing large-scale educational and quality initiatives like the ImPACTS program.
期刊介绍:
Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.