选择生独生子女vs.环境生独生子女:为什么有些妇女只生一个孩子?

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Reproductive Sciences Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1007/s43032-024-01767-6
Satoshi Kanazawa, Yoko Awata
{"title":"选择生独生子女vs.环境生独生子女:为什么有些妇女只生一个孩子?","authors":"Satoshi Kanazawa, Yoko Awata","doi":"10.1007/s43032-024-01767-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In an attempt to stimulate further theory and research on only children, we introduce two conceptual distinctions: Only children as independent variables vs. only children as dependent variables; and only children by choice vs. only children by circumstances. What little scientific research exists on only children to date focuses almost exclusively on only children as independent variables and fails to make a distinction between only children by choice and only children by circumstances. A focus on only children by choice as dependent variables explores the question of why some women choose to have only one child. As an empirical illustration, analyses of prospectively longitudinal data with a nationally representative sample in the United Kingdom (National Child Development Study) show that women who experience pregnancy complications are significantly less likely to have another child and significantly more likely to have only one child. Our results suggest that increased chances of pregnancy complications that American women now experience alone can explain about 10% of the increase in the number of only children in the United States in the last half century. If certain genes incline women to have pregnancy complications, it is possible that only children by circumstances are genetically more similar to children with siblings than to only children by choice.</p>","PeriodicalId":20920,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Only Children by Choice vs. Only Children by Circumstances: Why Do Some Women Have Only One Child?\",\"authors\":\"Satoshi Kanazawa, Yoko Awata\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43032-024-01767-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In an attempt to stimulate further theory and research on only children, we introduce two conceptual distinctions: Only children as independent variables vs. only children as dependent variables; and only children by choice vs. only children by circumstances. What little scientific research exists on only children to date focuses almost exclusively on only children as independent variables and fails to make a distinction between only children by choice and only children by circumstances. A focus on only children by choice as dependent variables explores the question of why some women choose to have only one child. As an empirical illustration, analyses of prospectively longitudinal data with a nationally representative sample in the United Kingdom (National Child Development Study) show that women who experience pregnancy complications are significantly less likely to have another child and significantly more likely to have only one child. Our results suggest that increased chances of pregnancy complications that American women now experience alone can explain about 10% of the increase in the number of only children in the United States in the last half century. If certain genes incline women to have pregnancy complications, it is possible that only children by circumstances are genetically more similar to children with siblings than to only children by choice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-024-01767-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-024-01767-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了激发对独生子女的进一步理论和研究,我们引入了两个概念上的区别:独生子女作为自变量与独生子女作为因变量;选择的独生子女和环境的独生子女。迄今为止,关于独生子女的科学研究很少,几乎只把独生子女作为独立的变量,没有区分选择独生子女和环境独生子女。把独生子女作为因变量来关注,探讨了为什么有些妇女选择只生一个孩子的问题。作为实证说明,对英国具有全国代表性样本的前瞻性纵向数据的分析(国家儿童发展研究)表明,经历妊娠并发症的妇女生育另一个孩子的可能性显着降低,而只生育一个孩子的可能性显着增加。我们的研究结果表明,美国女性现在独自经历的妊娠并发症的几率增加可以解释过去半个世纪美国独生子女数量增加的10%。如果某些基因倾向于女性有妊娠并发症,那么由于环境的原因,独生子女在基因上可能与有兄弟姐妹的孩子更相似,而不是自己选择的独生子女。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Only Children by Choice vs. Only Children by Circumstances: Why Do Some Women Have Only One Child?

In an attempt to stimulate further theory and research on only children, we introduce two conceptual distinctions: Only children as independent variables vs. only children as dependent variables; and only children by choice vs. only children by circumstances. What little scientific research exists on only children to date focuses almost exclusively on only children as independent variables and fails to make a distinction between only children by choice and only children by circumstances. A focus on only children by choice as dependent variables explores the question of why some women choose to have only one child. As an empirical illustration, analyses of prospectively longitudinal data with a nationally representative sample in the United Kingdom (National Child Development Study) show that women who experience pregnancy complications are significantly less likely to have another child and significantly more likely to have only one child. Our results suggest that increased chances of pregnancy complications that American women now experience alone can explain about 10% of the increase in the number of only children in the United States in the last half century. If certain genes incline women to have pregnancy complications, it is possible that only children by circumstances are genetically more similar to children with siblings than to only children by choice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reproductive Sciences
Reproductive Sciences 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.40%
发文量
322
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproductive Sciences (RS) is a peer-reviewed, monthly journal publishing original research and reviews in obstetrics and gynecology. RS is multi-disciplinary and includes research in basic reproductive biology and medicine, maternal-fetal medicine, obstetrics, gynecology, reproductive endocrinology, urogynecology, fertility/infertility, embryology, gynecologic/reproductive oncology, developmental biology, stem cell research, molecular/cellular biology and other related fields.
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Endometrial Polyp and Myoma Uteri on Fertility-Related Genes in the Endometrium. Association of Kisspeptin and KISS1 Gene Polymorphism (rs35431622) with Circulating Sex Hormones and Male Infertility. Azurocidin is Associated with Dienogest-resistance in Ovarian Endometriotic Cysts. Establishing the Mechanisms Involved in the Environmental Exposure to Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) in the Risk of Male Infertility. Identification of YBX2 and TSKS As STK33 Interacting Proteins in Testicular Germ Cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1