John P Avendano, William ElNemer, Susana Núñez-Pereira, Paul D Sponseller
{"title":"随访10年，无论Lenke类型如何，AIS患者的总体SRS-22r自我形象和满意度评分均较术前有所改善。","authors":"John P Avendano, William ElNemer, Susana Núñez-Pereira, Paul D Sponseller","doi":"10.1007/s43390-024-01006-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Few studies have investigated quality-of-life (QoL)-related outcome measures in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients over long-term follow-up. We investigated whether patients with any given Lenke type improved relative to other types and whether selective fusions resulted in better QoL-related outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized the Harms Study Group database to select patients with AIS who underwent posterior spinal fusion (PSF) with Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire-22 revised (SRS-22r) scores at minimum 10-year follow-up. Characteristics and SRS-22r were quantified by Lenke type and compared using ANOVA and Tukey post hoc tests. Multivariate analyses were conducted to identify the predictive value of Lenke types on QoL-related outcomes. Sub-group analysis split cohorts into those who underwent selective vs. non-selective fusion(s).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>110 patients were available at minimum 10-year follow-up. Types 3, 4, and 6 curves generally demonstrated lower SRS-22r scores both preoperatively and at long-term follow-up. Independent of Lenke type, total SRS-22r, along with self-image and satisfaction, showed consistent improvement relative to pre-op at 10-year follow-up, whereas pain, mental health, and general function showed a slight worsening. Sub-group analyses revealed no significant differences in SRS-22r scores between selective and non-selective fusion groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At 10-year follow-up, total SRS-22r, self-image, and satisfaction scores stayed consistently improved relative to preoperative status over time, while pain, general function, and mental health declined from 2 years onward. Increased age may play a role in enhancing self-image and satisfaction while worsening general function, pain, and mental health. Selectively vs. non-selectively fusing a patient should not hinge on fear of impacting patients' QoL-related measures, as our data suggest improvement in total SRS-22r, self-image, and satisfaction regardless.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>","PeriodicalId":21796,"journal":{"name":"Spine deformity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AIS patients have improved total SRS-22r self-image and satisfaction scores relative to pre-op at 10-year follow-up regardless of Lenke type.\",\"authors\":\"John P Avendano, William ElNemer, Susana Núñez-Pereira, Paul D Sponseller\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43390-024-01006-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Few studies have investigated quality-of-life (QoL)-related outcome measures in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients over long-term follow-up. We investigated whether patients with any given Lenke type improved relative to other types and whether selective fusions resulted in better QoL-related outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized the Harms Study Group database to select patients with AIS who underwent posterior spinal fusion (PSF) with Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire-22 revised (SRS-22r) scores at minimum 10-year follow-up. Characteristics and SRS-22r were quantified by Lenke type and compared using ANOVA and Tukey post hoc tests. Multivariate analyses were conducted to identify the predictive value of Lenke types on QoL-related outcomes. Sub-group analysis split cohorts into those who underwent selective vs. non-selective fusion(s).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>110 patients were available at minimum 10-year follow-up. Types 3, 4, and 6 curves generally demonstrated lower SRS-22r scores both preoperatively and at long-term follow-up. Independent of Lenke type, total SRS-22r, along with self-image and satisfaction, showed consistent improvement relative to pre-op at 10-year follow-up, whereas pain, mental health, and general function showed a slight worsening. Sub-group analyses revealed no significant differences in SRS-22r scores between selective and non-selective fusion groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At 10-year follow-up, total SRS-22r, self-image, and satisfaction scores stayed consistently improved relative to preoperative status over time, while pain, general function, and mental health declined from 2 years onward. Increased age may play a role in enhancing self-image and satisfaction while worsening general function, pain, and mental health. Selectively vs. non-selectively fusing a patient should not hinge on fear of impacting patients' QoL-related measures, as our data suggest improvement in total SRS-22r, self-image, and satisfaction regardless.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine deformity\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine deformity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-024-01006-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine deformity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-024-01006-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
AIS patients have improved total SRS-22r self-image and satisfaction scores relative to pre-op at 10-year follow-up regardless of Lenke type.
Purpose: Few studies have investigated quality-of-life (QoL)-related outcome measures in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients over long-term follow-up. We investigated whether patients with any given Lenke type improved relative to other types and whether selective fusions resulted in better QoL-related outcome measures.
Methods: We utilized the Harms Study Group database to select patients with AIS who underwent posterior spinal fusion (PSF) with Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire-22 revised (SRS-22r) scores at minimum 10-year follow-up. Characteristics and SRS-22r were quantified by Lenke type and compared using ANOVA and Tukey post hoc tests. Multivariate analyses were conducted to identify the predictive value of Lenke types on QoL-related outcomes. Sub-group analysis split cohorts into those who underwent selective vs. non-selective fusion(s).
Results: 110 patients were available at minimum 10-year follow-up. Types 3, 4, and 6 curves generally demonstrated lower SRS-22r scores both preoperatively and at long-term follow-up. Independent of Lenke type, total SRS-22r, along with self-image and satisfaction, showed consistent improvement relative to pre-op at 10-year follow-up, whereas pain, mental health, and general function showed a slight worsening. Sub-group analyses revealed no significant differences in SRS-22r scores between selective and non-selective fusion groups.
Conclusions: At 10-year follow-up, total SRS-22r, self-image, and satisfaction scores stayed consistently improved relative to preoperative status over time, while pain, general function, and mental health declined from 2 years onward. Increased age may play a role in enhancing self-image and satisfaction while worsening general function, pain, and mental health. Selectively vs. non-selectively fusing a patient should not hinge on fear of impacting patients' QoL-related measures, as our data suggest improvement in total SRS-22r, self-image, and satisfaction regardless.
期刊介绍：
Spine Deformity the official journal of the?Scoliosis Research Society is a peer-refereed publication to disseminate knowledge on basic science and clinical research into the?etiology?biomechanics?treatment?methods and outcomes of all types of?spinal deformities. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal's area of interest.The?journal?will enhance the mission of the Society which is to foster the optimal care of all patients with?spine?deformities worldwide. Articles published in?Spine Deformity?are Medline indexed in PubMed.? The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research. Spine Deformity will only publish studies that have institutional review board (IRB) or similar ethics committee approval for human and animal studies and have strictly observed these guidelines. The minimum follow-up period for follow-up clinical studies is 24 months.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
