靶向治疗对BRAF V600E突变转移性结直肠癌患者反应深度和早期肿瘤缩小的影响

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-01-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17588359241299975
Guglielmo Vetere, Marco Maria Germani, Carlotta Antoniotti, Lisa Salvatore, Filippo Pietrantonio, Sara Lonardi, Maria Bensi, Filippo Ghelardi, Maria Alessandra Calegari, Rossana Intini, Alessandro Minelli, Francesco Giulio Sullo, Chiara Boccaccio, Ada Taravella, Alberto Puccini, Daniele Lavacchi, Laura Noto, Massimiliano Salati, Mario Scartozzi, Chiara Cremolini
{"title":"靶向治疗对BRAF V600E突变转移性结直肠癌患者反应深度和早期肿瘤缩小的影响","authors":"Guglielmo Vetere, Marco Maria Germani, Carlotta Antoniotti, Lisa Salvatore, Filippo Pietrantonio, Sara Lonardi, Maria Bensi, Filippo Ghelardi, Maria Alessandra Calegari, Rossana Intini, Alessandro Minelli, Francesco Giulio Sullo, Chiara Boccaccio, Ada Taravella, Alberto Puccini, Daniele Lavacchi, Laura Noto, Massimiliano Salati, Mario Scartozzi, Chiara Cremolini","doi":"10.1177/17588359241299975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Encorafenib plus cetuximab (EC) is the standard of care for pre-treated <i>BRAF</i> <sup><i>V600E</i></sup> mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Depth of response (DpR) and early tumour shrinkage (ETS) previously showed a strong correlation with survival outcomes of first-line chemotherapy ± biological agents.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to assess potential predictors of primary resistance to EC ± binimetinib (B) and relationships of DpR/ETS with survival outcomes and clinical characteristics.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a retrospective real-world cohort study of <i>BRAF</i> <sup><i>V600E</i></sup> mutated mCRC patients treated with second-line EC ± B at 20 Italian centres.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Measurable disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumour (RECIST) 1.1 at baseline and at least one subsequent computed tomography (CT) scan were mandatory for inclusion. Clinical features associated with primary resistance, DpR and ETS were investigated. Relationships of DpR and ETS, both as binary, according to conventional (30% for DpR and 20% for ETS) and median cut-off values, and continuous variables, with progression-free (PFS), overall survival (OS) and duration of response (DoR) were assessed in non-primary resistant patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 105 patients were included. The primary resistance rate was 28% (29/105) and was associated with baseline peritoneal metastases (<i>p</i> = 0.04). Disease control and overall response rates were 72% (76/105) and 24% (25/105), respectively, with a median DpR of 15% and an ETS rate of 37% (28/76). Mucinous histology was associated with a significantly lower magnitude of DpR (<i>p</i> = 0.005) and a lower rate of ETS (<i>p</i> = 0.002). In the multivariable models, DpR significantly correlated with longer PFS as a dichotomous variable, according both to conventional (hazard ratio (HR)<sub>DpR</sub> <sub>⩾</sub> <sub>30%</sub>: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.30-0.90, <i>p</i> = 0.02) and median cut-off values (HR<sub>DpR⩾15%</sub>: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.33-0.92, <i>p</i> = 0.03), and as a continuous variable (HR per 10% increment: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.78-0.98, <i>p</i> = 0.02), while correlations with OS were not confirmed. DpR was also significantly associated with longer DoR (<i>p</i> <sub>DpR⩾30%</sub> = 0.04; <i>p</i> <sub>DpR⩾15%</sub> = 0.04; <i>p</i> <sub>cont.</sub> = 0.02), whereas no relationships of ETS with PFS, OS or DoR were detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A DpR of at least 15% independently predicts PFS benefit in <i>BRAF</i> <sup><i>V600E</i></sup> mutated mCRC patients treated with second-line EC ± B.</p>","PeriodicalId":23053,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","volume":"17 ","pages":"17588359241299975"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705328/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic impact of depth of response and early tumour shrinkage in patients with <i>BRAF</i> <sup><i>V600E</i></sup> -mutated metastatic colorectal cancer treated with targeted therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Guglielmo Vetere, Marco Maria Germani, Carlotta Antoniotti, Lisa Salvatore, Filippo Pietrantonio, Sara Lonardi, Maria Bensi, Filippo Ghelardi, Maria Alessandra Calegari, Rossana Intini, Alessandro Minelli, Francesco Giulio Sullo, Chiara Boccaccio, Ada Taravella, Alberto Puccini, Daniele Lavacchi, Laura Noto, Massimiliano Salati, Mario Scartozzi, Chiara Cremolini\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17588359241299975\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Encorafenib plus cetuximab (EC) is the standard of care for pre-treated <i>BRAF</i> <sup><i>V600E</i></sup> mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Depth of response (DpR) and early tumour shrinkage (ETS) previously showed a strong correlation with survival outcomes of first-line chemotherapy ± biological agents.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to assess potential predictors of primary resistance to EC ± binimetinib (B) and relationships of DpR/ETS with survival outcomes and clinical characteristics.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a retrospective real-world cohort study of <i>BRAF</i> <sup><i>V600E</i></sup> mutated mCRC patients treated with second-line EC ± B at 20 Italian centres.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Measurable disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumour (RECIST) 1.1 at baseline and at least one subsequent computed tomography (CT) scan were mandatory for inclusion. Clinical features associated with primary resistance, DpR and ETS were investigated. Relationships of DpR and ETS, both as binary, according to conventional (30% for DpR and 20% for ETS) and median cut-off values, and continuous variables, with progression-free (PFS), overall survival (OS) and duration of response (DoR) were assessed in non-primary resistant patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 105 patients were included. The primary resistance rate was 28% (29/105) and was associated with baseline peritoneal metastases (<i>p</i> = 0.04). Disease control and overall response rates were 72% (76/105) and 24% (25/105), respectively, with a median DpR of 15% and an ETS rate of 37% (28/76). Mucinous histology was associated with a significantly lower magnitude of DpR (<i>p</i> = 0.005) and a lower rate of ETS (<i>p</i> = 0.002). In the multivariable models, DpR significantly correlated with longer PFS as a dichotomous variable, according both to conventional (hazard ratio (HR)<sub>DpR</sub> <sub>⩾</sub> <sub>30%</sub>: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.30-0.90, <i>p</i> = 0.02) and median cut-off values (HR<sub>DpR⩾15%</sub>: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.33-0.92, <i>p</i> = 0.03), and as a continuous variable (HR per 10% increment: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.78-0.98, <i>p</i> = 0.02), while correlations with OS were not confirmed. DpR was also significantly associated with longer DoR (<i>p</i> <sub>DpR⩾30%</sub> = 0.04; <i>p</i> <sub>DpR⩾15%</sub> = 0.04; <i>p</i> <sub>cont.</sub> = 0.02), whereas no relationships of ETS with PFS, OS or DoR were detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A DpR of at least 15% independently predicts PFS benefit in <i>BRAF</i> <sup><i>V600E</i></sup> mutated mCRC patients treated with second-line EC ± B.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"17588359241299975\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705328/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359241299975\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359241299975","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:恩科非尼加西妥昔单抗(EC)是治疗前BRAF V600E突变转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)的标准治疗方案。缓解深度(Depth of response, DpR)和早期肿瘤缩小(early tumor shrinkage, ETS)与一线化疗±生物制剂的生存结果有很强的相关性。目的:我们旨在评估EC±binimetinib (B)原发性耐药的潜在预测因素,以及DpR/ETS与生存结局和临床特征的关系。设计:这是一项在意大利20个中心接受二线EC±B治疗的BRAF V600E突变mCRC患者的回顾性现实世界队列研究。方法:根据实体瘤应答评价标准(RECIST) 1.1的基线可测量疾病和至少一次后续计算机断层扫描(CT)被强制纳入。研究了与原发性耐药、DpR和ETS相关的临床特征。在非原发性耐药患者中,根据常规(DpR为30%,ETS为20%)和中位截止值以及连续变量,评估无进展(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和反应持续时间(DoR), DpR和ETS均为二元的关系。结果:共纳入105例患者。原发性耐药率为28%(29/105),与基线腹膜转移相关(p = 0.04)。疾病控制率和总缓解率分别为72%(76/105)和24%(25/105),中位DpR为15%,ETS率为37%(28/76)。黏液组织学与较低的DpR程度(p = 0.005)和较低的ETS发生率(p = 0.002)相关。在多变量模型中,DpR作为二分类变量与较长的PFS显著相关,根据常规(风险比(HR)DpR大于或等于30%:0.52,95% CI: 0.30-0.90, p = 0.02)和中位截止值(HRDpR大于或等于15%:0.55,95% CI: 0.33-0.92, p = 0.03),以及作为连续变量(HR每10%增量:0.88,95% CI: 0.78-0.98, p = 0.02),而与OS的相关性未得到证实。DpR也与更长的DoR显著相关(p DpR大于或等于30% = 0.04;p DpR小于15% = 0.04;p cont = 0.02),而ETS与PFS、OS或DoR没有关系。结论:DpR至少为15%独立预测BRAF V600E突变的mCRC患者接受二线EC±B治疗的PFS获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prognostic impact of depth of response and early tumour shrinkage in patients with BRAF V600E -mutated metastatic colorectal cancer treated with targeted therapy.

Background: Encorafenib plus cetuximab (EC) is the standard of care for pre-treated BRAF V600E mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Depth of response (DpR) and early tumour shrinkage (ETS) previously showed a strong correlation with survival outcomes of first-line chemotherapy ± biological agents.

Objectives: We aimed to assess potential predictors of primary resistance to EC ± binimetinib (B) and relationships of DpR/ETS with survival outcomes and clinical characteristics.

Design: This is a retrospective real-world cohort study of BRAF V600E mutated mCRC patients treated with second-line EC ± B at 20 Italian centres.

Methods: Measurable disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumour (RECIST) 1.1 at baseline and at least one subsequent computed tomography (CT) scan were mandatory for inclusion. Clinical features associated with primary resistance, DpR and ETS were investigated. Relationships of DpR and ETS, both as binary, according to conventional (30% for DpR and 20% for ETS) and median cut-off values, and continuous variables, with progression-free (PFS), overall survival (OS) and duration of response (DoR) were assessed in non-primary resistant patients.

Results: A total of 105 patients were included. The primary resistance rate was 28% (29/105) and was associated with baseline peritoneal metastases (p = 0.04). Disease control and overall response rates were 72% (76/105) and 24% (25/105), respectively, with a median DpR of 15% and an ETS rate of 37% (28/76). Mucinous histology was associated with a significantly lower magnitude of DpR (p = 0.005) and a lower rate of ETS (p = 0.002). In the multivariable models, DpR significantly correlated with longer PFS as a dichotomous variable, according both to conventional (hazard ratio (HR)DpR 30%: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.30-0.90, p = 0.02) and median cut-off values (HRDpR⩾15%: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.33-0.92, p = 0.03), and as a continuous variable (HR per 10% increment: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.78-0.98, p = 0.02), while correlations with OS were not confirmed. DpR was also significantly associated with longer DoR (p DpR⩾30% = 0.04; p DpR⩾15% = 0.04; p cont. = 0.02), whereas no relationships of ETS with PFS, OS or DoR were detected.

Conclusion: A DpR of at least 15% independently predicts PFS benefit in BRAF V600E mutated mCRC patients treated with second-line EC ± B.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.00%
发文量
160
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal delivering the highest quality articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of cancer. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in medical oncology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Extracellular vesicles-a new player in the development of urinary bladder cancer. Prognostic impact of primary versus secondary resistance to sorafenib in patients with HCC. Treatment-related mortality in head and neck cancer patients receiving chemotherapy and radiation: results of a meta-analysis of published trials. Enhancing rare cancer care in developing countries through patient advocacy: insights from the Desmoid Tumor Brazilian Association. Navigating the landscape of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for NSCLC: progress and controversies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1