一项单中心随机对照试验,比较标准方法和靶控输注作为给药头孢西丁的方法,头孢西丁用于预防结直肠手术患者手术部位感染:研究方案。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Trials Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1186/s13063-025-08716-x
Ha-Jung Kim, Kyung Mi Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, In Ja Park, Byung-Moon Choi
{"title":"一项单中心随机对照试验,比较标准方法和靶控输注作为给药头孢西丁的方法,头孢西丁用于预防结直肠手术患者手术部位感染:研究方案。","authors":"Ha-Jung Kim, Kyung Mi Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, In Ja Park, Byung-Moon Choi","doi":"10.1186/s13063-025-08716-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prophylactic parenteral administration of antibiotics is strongly recommended to prevent surgical site infection (SSI). Cefoxitin is mainly administered intravenously in colorectal surgery. The current standard method for administering prophylactic antibiotics in adults is to administer a fixed dose quickly before skin incision. The percentage of time that the unbound concentration is maintained above the minimum inhibitory concentration (fT > MIC) during surgery is used as a surrogate measure for the effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics. Target-controlled infusion (TCI) is a method of administration that changes the infusion rate to maintain a constant target concentration set by the user in consideration of the patient's physical characteristics. When cefoxitin is administered using the TCI method, it is possible that fT > MIC can be well maintained while reflecting the patient's physical characteristics compared to the standard method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, single-centre, parallel-arm, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation was designed to compare the effectiveness of the TCI method with that of the standard cefoxitin administration method. We shall enrol 2494 patients scheduled to undergo colon or rectal surgery. Prior to the procedure, we shall randomise each patient to the control group (standard administration method) or study group (TCI method). In the control group, 2 g of cefoxitin was dissolved in 100 ml of normal saline and administered for approximately 10 min. Redosing was performed every 2 h from the start of the first dose of cefoxitin. In the study group, 2 g of cefoxitin was dissolved in 50 ml of normal saline and administered using a commercialised TCI syringe pump until the end of surgery. It was administered at a target concentration of 80 μg/ml using the total concentration pharmacokinetic model of cefoxitin. In all groups, 2 g of cefoxitin was administered using the standard administration method 12 h after the end of surgery. The primary outcome will be the incidence of SSI. The secondary outcome will be the administered dose of cefoxitin. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study will provide evidence for the effectiveness of administering cefoxitin using the TCI method compared to the standard method.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05253339 , Registered on February 23, 2022 {2a, 2b}.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"26 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11708072/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A single-centre randomised controlled trial comparing the standard method and target-controlled infusion as a method of administering cefoxitin, which is used to prevent surgical site infections in colorectal surgical patients: study protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Ha-Jung Kim, Kyung Mi Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, In Ja Park, Byung-Moon Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13063-025-08716-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prophylactic parenteral administration of antibiotics is strongly recommended to prevent surgical site infection (SSI). Cefoxitin is mainly administered intravenously in colorectal surgery. The current standard method for administering prophylactic antibiotics in adults is to administer a fixed dose quickly before skin incision. The percentage of time that the unbound concentration is maintained above the minimum inhibitory concentration (fT > MIC) during surgery is used as a surrogate measure for the effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics. Target-controlled infusion (TCI) is a method of administration that changes the infusion rate to maintain a constant target concentration set by the user in consideration of the patient's physical characteristics. When cefoxitin is administered using the TCI method, it is possible that fT > MIC can be well maintained while reflecting the patient's physical characteristics compared to the standard method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, single-centre, parallel-arm, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation was designed to compare the effectiveness of the TCI method with that of the standard cefoxitin administration method. We shall enrol 2494 patients scheduled to undergo colon or rectal surgery. Prior to the procedure, we shall randomise each patient to the control group (standard administration method) or study group (TCI method). In the control group, 2 g of cefoxitin was dissolved in 100 ml of normal saline and administered for approximately 10 min. Redosing was performed every 2 h from the start of the first dose of cefoxitin. In the study group, 2 g of cefoxitin was dissolved in 50 ml of normal saline and administered using a commercialised TCI syringe pump until the end of surgery. It was administered at a target concentration of 80 μg/ml using the total concentration pharmacokinetic model of cefoxitin. In all groups, 2 g of cefoxitin was administered using the standard administration method 12 h after the end of surgery. The primary outcome will be the incidence of SSI. The secondary outcome will be the administered dose of cefoxitin. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study will provide evidence for the effectiveness of administering cefoxitin using the TCI method compared to the standard method.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05253339 , Registered on February 23, 2022 {2a, 2b}.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trials\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11708072/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-08716-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-08716-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:强烈建议预防性肠外注射抗生素以预防手术部位感染(SSI)。头孢西丁主要在结肠直肠手术中静脉给药。目前给药成人预防性抗生素的标准方法是在皮肤切口前快速给药固定剂量。手术期间未结合浓度维持在最低抑制浓度(fT > MIC)以上的时间百分比被用作预防性抗生素有效性的替代措施。靶控输注(target -controlled infusion, TCI)是一种改变输注速率以维持使用者根据患者身体特征设定的恒定靶浓度的给药方法。采用TCI方法给药头孢西丁时,与标准方法相比,可以很好地维持fT > MIC,同时反映患者的身体特征。方法:该前瞻性、单中心、平行臂、单盲、随机对照试验设计为1:1分配,旨在比较TCI方法与头孢西丁标准给药方法的有效性。我们将招募2494名计划接受结肠或直肠手术的患者。在手术前,我们将每位患者随机分为对照组(标准给药法)或研究组(TCI法)。对照组将头孢西丁2g溶解于100 ml生理盐水中,给药约10分钟。自头孢西丁首次给药开始,每2小时重新给药一次。在研究组中,将2g头孢西丁溶解于50ml生理盐水中,使用商品化TCI注射泵给药,直至手术结束。采用头孢西丁总浓度药代动力学模型,给药浓度为80 μg/ml。各组患者术后12 h按标准给药方法给予头孢西丁2 g。主要结果将是SSI的发生率。次要结果将是头孢西丁的给药剂量。收集术前、术中、术后数据。讨论:本研究将为与标准方法相比,采用TCI方法给药头孢西丁的有效性提供证据。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05253339,注册于2022年2月23日{2a, 2b}。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A single-centre randomised controlled trial comparing the standard method and target-controlled infusion as a method of administering cefoxitin, which is used to prevent surgical site infections in colorectal surgical patients: study protocol.

Background: Prophylactic parenteral administration of antibiotics is strongly recommended to prevent surgical site infection (SSI). Cefoxitin is mainly administered intravenously in colorectal surgery. The current standard method for administering prophylactic antibiotics in adults is to administer a fixed dose quickly before skin incision. The percentage of time that the unbound concentration is maintained above the minimum inhibitory concentration (fT > MIC) during surgery is used as a surrogate measure for the effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics. Target-controlled infusion (TCI) is a method of administration that changes the infusion rate to maintain a constant target concentration set by the user in consideration of the patient's physical characteristics. When cefoxitin is administered using the TCI method, it is possible that fT > MIC can be well maintained while reflecting the patient's physical characteristics compared to the standard method.

Methods: This prospective, single-centre, parallel-arm, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation was designed to compare the effectiveness of the TCI method with that of the standard cefoxitin administration method. We shall enrol 2494 patients scheduled to undergo colon or rectal surgery. Prior to the procedure, we shall randomise each patient to the control group (standard administration method) or study group (TCI method). In the control group, 2 g of cefoxitin was dissolved in 100 ml of normal saline and administered for approximately 10 min. Redosing was performed every 2 h from the start of the first dose of cefoxitin. In the study group, 2 g of cefoxitin was dissolved in 50 ml of normal saline and administered using a commercialised TCI syringe pump until the end of surgery. It was administered at a target concentration of 80 μg/ml using the total concentration pharmacokinetic model of cefoxitin. In all groups, 2 g of cefoxitin was administered using the standard administration method 12 h after the end of surgery. The primary outcome will be the incidence of SSI. The secondary outcome will be the administered dose of cefoxitin. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected.

Discussion: This study will provide evidence for the effectiveness of administering cefoxitin using the TCI method compared to the standard method.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05253339 , Registered on February 23, 2022 {2a, 2b}.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing vaccine clinical trials participation among elderly: challenges and strategies. How to improve the quality of euglycemic glucose clamp tests in long-acting insulin studies. Assessing the effectiveness and the feasibility of a group-based treatment for self-stigma in people with mental disorders in routine mental health services in North-East Italy: study protocol for a pragmatic multisite randomized controlled trial. Distribution of trial registry numbers within full-text of PubMed Central articles: implications for linking trials to publications and indexing trial publication types. The impact of vitamin E supplementation on sperm analysis in varicocelectomy patients: a triple-blind randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1