开放标签随机临床试验调查机器人辅助肾移植与开放肾移植(ORAKTx)相比是否能减少手术并发症:一项随机临床试验的研究方案。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Trials Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1186/s13063-024-08706-5
Milla Ortved, Julia Dagnæs-Hansen, Hein V Stroomberg, Thomas Kistorp, Malene Rohrsted, Søren Schwartz Sørensen, Andreas Røder
{"title":"开放标签随机临床试验调查机器人辅助肾移植与开放肾移植(ORAKTx)相比是否能减少手术并发症:一项随机临床试验的研究方案。","authors":"Milla Ortved, Julia Dagnæs-Hansen, Hein V Stroomberg, Thomas Kistorp, Malene Rohrsted, Søren Schwartz Sørensen, Andreas Røder","doi":"10.1186/s13063-024-08706-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Kidney transplantation is the ultimate treatment for end-stage kidney disease. Function of the kidney graft is not only dependent on medical factors but also on a complication-free surgical procedure. In the event of major surgical complications, the kidney graft is potentially lost and the patient will return to the waiting list which may be long. To optimise peri-operative care and reduce complications, robot-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) has been introduced as an alternative to open kidney transplantation (OKT), but to our knowledge, no randomised clinical trials (RCT) have compared RAKT to OKT. In this study, we will explore whether robot-assisted surgery can reduce 30-day surgical complications compared to open surgery in kidney transplantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-site, open-label, randomised clinical trial comparing RAKT to OKT. Participants are adult recipients of kidney transplantation recruited from Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Denmark. The study plans to include 106 participants who will be randomised in a 1:1 manner between OKT and RAKT. Primary outcomes are vascular- and major surgical complications at 30 days post-operatively. Participants will be followed for 2 years to evaluate secondary outcomes including recovery, late complications and kidney graft function. This is designed as a superiority trial and planned analyses will follow intention-to-treat principles.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Studies indicate RAKT can reduce several surgical complications, but the lack of RCTs limits the extrapolation of these results to justify replacing an open approach with a robot-assisted one. Ultimately, the introduction of new surgical techniques should be as vigorously tested as any other new treatments. However, reducing surgical complications that compromise graft viability could lead to improved patient care and survival.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial was prospectively registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on February 15th, 2023, with the identifier NCT05730257.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"26 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11702044/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open-label randomised clinical trial investigating whether robot-assisted kidney transplantation can reduce surgical complications compared to open kidney transplantation (ORAKTx): study protocol for a randomised clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Milla Ortved, Julia Dagnæs-Hansen, Hein V Stroomberg, Thomas Kistorp, Malene Rohrsted, Søren Schwartz Sørensen, Andreas Røder\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13063-024-08706-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Kidney transplantation is the ultimate treatment for end-stage kidney disease. Function of the kidney graft is not only dependent on medical factors but also on a complication-free surgical procedure. In the event of major surgical complications, the kidney graft is potentially lost and the patient will return to the waiting list which may be long. To optimise peri-operative care and reduce complications, robot-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) has been introduced as an alternative to open kidney transplantation (OKT), but to our knowledge, no randomised clinical trials (RCT) have compared RAKT to OKT. In this study, we will explore whether robot-assisted surgery can reduce 30-day surgical complications compared to open surgery in kidney transplantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-site, open-label, randomised clinical trial comparing RAKT to OKT. Participants are adult recipients of kidney transplantation recruited from Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Denmark. The study plans to include 106 participants who will be randomised in a 1:1 manner between OKT and RAKT. Primary outcomes are vascular- and major surgical complications at 30 days post-operatively. Participants will be followed for 2 years to evaluate secondary outcomes including recovery, late complications and kidney graft function. This is designed as a superiority trial and planned analyses will follow intention-to-treat principles.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Studies indicate RAKT can reduce several surgical complications, but the lack of RCTs limits the extrapolation of these results to justify replacing an open approach with a robot-assisted one. Ultimately, the introduction of new surgical techniques should be as vigorously tested as any other new treatments. However, reducing surgical complications that compromise graft viability could lead to improved patient care and survival.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial was prospectively registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on February 15th, 2023, with the identifier NCT05730257.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trials\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11702044/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08706-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08706-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肾移植是终末期肾脏疾病的最终治疗方法。肾移植的功能不仅取决于医学因素,而且取决于无并发症的手术过程。如果发生严重的手术并发症,肾脏移植可能会丢失,患者将回到可能很长的等待名单中。为了优化围手术期护理并减少并发症,机器人辅助肾移植(RAKT)已被引入作为开放式肾移植(OKT)的替代方案,但据我们所知,没有随机临床试验(RCT)将RAKT与OKT进行比较。在这项研究中,我们将探讨与开放手术相比,机器人辅助手术是否可以减少肾移植手术30天的手术并发症。方法:这是一项比较RAKT和OKT的单点、开放标签、随机临床试验。参与者是来自丹麦哥本哈根大学医院的成年肾移植受者。该研究计划包括106名参与者,他们将以1:1的方式在OKT和RAKT之间随机分配。主要结局是术后30天的血管和主要手术并发症。参与者将被随访2年,以评估次要结果,包括恢复、晚期并发症和肾移植功能。这是一项优势试验,计划分析将遵循意向-治疗原则。讨论:研究表明RAKT可以减少几种手术并发症,但缺乏随机对照试验限制了这些结果的外推,以证明用机器人辅助的方法代替开放的方法是合理的。最终,新手术技术的引入应该像其他新疗法一样经过严格的测试。然而,减少影响移植物生存能力的手术并发症可以改善患者的护理和生存率。试验注册:该试验于2023年2月15日在ClinicalTrials.gov前瞻性注册,标识符为NCT05730257。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Open-label randomised clinical trial investigating whether robot-assisted kidney transplantation can reduce surgical complications compared to open kidney transplantation (ORAKTx): study protocol for a randomised clinical trial.

Background: Kidney transplantation is the ultimate treatment for end-stage kidney disease. Function of the kidney graft is not only dependent on medical factors but also on a complication-free surgical procedure. In the event of major surgical complications, the kidney graft is potentially lost and the patient will return to the waiting list which may be long. To optimise peri-operative care and reduce complications, robot-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) has been introduced as an alternative to open kidney transplantation (OKT), but to our knowledge, no randomised clinical trials (RCT) have compared RAKT to OKT. In this study, we will explore whether robot-assisted surgery can reduce 30-day surgical complications compared to open surgery in kidney transplantation.

Methods: This is a single-site, open-label, randomised clinical trial comparing RAKT to OKT. Participants are adult recipients of kidney transplantation recruited from Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Denmark. The study plans to include 106 participants who will be randomised in a 1:1 manner between OKT and RAKT. Primary outcomes are vascular- and major surgical complications at 30 days post-operatively. Participants will be followed for 2 years to evaluate secondary outcomes including recovery, late complications and kidney graft function. This is designed as a superiority trial and planned analyses will follow intention-to-treat principles.

Discussion: Studies indicate RAKT can reduce several surgical complications, but the lack of RCTs limits the extrapolation of these results to justify replacing an open approach with a robot-assisted one. Ultimately, the introduction of new surgical techniques should be as vigorously tested as any other new treatments. However, reducing surgical complications that compromise graft viability could lead to improved patient care and survival.

Trial registration: The trial was prospectively registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on February 15th, 2023, with the identifier NCT05730257.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing vaccine clinical trials participation among elderly: challenges and strategies. How to improve the quality of euglycemic glucose clamp tests in long-acting insulin studies. Assessing the effectiveness and the feasibility of a group-based treatment for self-stigma in people with mental disorders in routine mental health services in North-East Italy: study protocol for a pragmatic multisite randomized controlled trial. Distribution of trial registry numbers within full-text of PubMed Central articles: implications for linking trials to publications and indexing trial publication types. The impact of vitamin E supplementation on sperm analysis in varicocelectomy patients: a triple-blind randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1