Silvia Monsalvo, Claudia Quintana, Claudia Mosquera, Ana Bocanegra, Myriam Aguilar, Ana García-de León, Carlos de Miguel, Rafael Forés, Rosalía Laporta, Guiomar Bautista, Roberto Fernández, Carlos Almonacid, Rafael F Duarte, José L Bueno
{"title":"配对研究比较单个核细胞收集使用新的在线系统和离线体外光采系统。","authors":"Silvia Monsalvo, Claudia Quintana, Claudia Mosquera, Ana Bocanegra, Myriam Aguilar, Ana García-de León, Carlos de Miguel, Rafael Forés, Rosalía Laporta, Guiomar Bautista, Roberto Fernández, Carlos Almonacid, Rafael F Duarte, José L Bueno","doi":"10.1111/trf.18118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) product characteristics are not well established. The aim of this study was to compare mononuclear cells (MNCs) collection using the new Amicus blue (AB) In-line ECP system to our standard Off-line ECP system using the Optia apheresis device and the MacoGenic G2 inactivation system (OM).</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>We assessed the ECP products and procedure parameters, patient characteristics, and adverse events for both AB and OM systems in paired patients. Comparisons were made with t-test for paired samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen patients underwent 15 double, paired procedures using both ECP protocols and processing the same blood volume of 4000 mL. Total MNC collected in the product were 51.6 × 10<sup>8</sup> (95% CI 30.0-73.1) and 42.2 × 10<sup>8</sup> (95% CI 22.4-62.0) for the AB and OM, respectively (not significant). Both products were also similar regarding volume, MNC concentration, purity, and hematocrit. However, total platelet count (×10<sup>11</sup>) was significantly lower in the AB products: 0.25 (95% CI 0.15-0.36) versus 1.2 (95% CI 0.9-1.5). The new AB system reduced significantly also the time invested and anticoagulant used per procedure compared with OM, albeit with similar collection efficiency and percentage of MNC captured per procedure. Hypocalcemia was the commonest adverse event with both systems, but it was not severe.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The new AB system collected MNC products comparable to our current experience with OM, although in a significantly shorter time, with a reduced use of anticoagulant and lower contamination with platelets, which are all valuable advantages of the new system.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A paired study comparing mononuclear cell collection using a new in-line system with an off-line extracorporeal photopheresis apheresis system.\",\"authors\":\"Silvia Monsalvo, Claudia Quintana, Claudia Mosquera, Ana Bocanegra, Myriam Aguilar, Ana García-de León, Carlos de Miguel, Rafael Forés, Rosalía Laporta, Guiomar Bautista, Roberto Fernández, Carlos Almonacid, Rafael F Duarte, José L Bueno\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/trf.18118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) product characteristics are not well established. The aim of this study was to compare mononuclear cells (MNCs) collection using the new Amicus blue (AB) In-line ECP system to our standard Off-line ECP system using the Optia apheresis device and the MacoGenic G2 inactivation system (OM).</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>We assessed the ECP products and procedure parameters, patient characteristics, and adverse events for both AB and OM systems in paired patients. Comparisons were made with t-test for paired samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen patients underwent 15 double, paired procedures using both ECP protocols and processing the same blood volume of 4000 mL. Total MNC collected in the product were 51.6 × 10<sup>8</sup> (95% CI 30.0-73.1) and 42.2 × 10<sup>8</sup> (95% CI 22.4-62.0) for the AB and OM, respectively (not significant). Both products were also similar regarding volume, MNC concentration, purity, and hematocrit. However, total platelet count (×10<sup>11</sup>) was significantly lower in the AB products: 0.25 (95% CI 0.15-0.36) versus 1.2 (95% CI 0.9-1.5). The new AB system reduced significantly also the time invested and anticoagulant used per procedure compared with OM, albeit with similar collection efficiency and percentage of MNC captured per procedure. Hypocalcemia was the commonest adverse event with both systems, but it was not severe.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The new AB system collected MNC products comparable to our current experience with OM, although in a significantly shorter time, with a reduced use of anticoagulant and lower contamination with platelets, which are all valuable advantages of the new system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfusion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfusion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18118\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18118","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:体外光化学(Extracorporeal photopheresis, ECP)产品的特性尚未得到很好的确定。本研究的目的是比较使用新型Amicus blue (AB)在线ECP系统收集的单个核细胞(MNCs)与使用Optia离心分离机和macogen G2失活系统(OM)的标准离线ECP系统。研究设计和方法:我们对配对患者中AB和OM系统的ECP产品和程序参数、患者特征和不良事件进行了评估。配对样本采用t检验进行比较。结果:13例患者接受了15次双重配对手术,采用两种ECP方案,处理相同的4000ml血容量。产品中收集到的AB和OM的总MNC分别为51.6 × 108 (95% CI 30.0 ~ 73.1)和42.2 × 108 (95% CI 22.4 ~ 62.0),差异无统计学意义。两种产品在体积、MNC浓度、纯度和红细胞压积方面也相似。然而,AB产品的总血小板计数(×1011)明显较低:0.25 (95% CI 0.15-0.36)比1.2 (95% CI 0.9-1.5)。与OM相比,新的AB系统也显著减少了每次操作所需的时间和抗凝剂的使用,尽管其收集效率和每次操作所捕获的MNC百分比相似。低钙血症是两种系统中最常见的不良事件,但并不严重。结论:新的AB系统收集的MNC产品与我们目前的OM经验相当,尽管在明显更短的时间内,抗凝血剂的使用减少,血小板污染更低,这些都是新系统的宝贵优势。
A paired study comparing mononuclear cell collection using a new in-line system with an off-line extracorporeal photopheresis apheresis system.
Background: Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) product characteristics are not well established. The aim of this study was to compare mononuclear cells (MNCs) collection using the new Amicus blue (AB) In-line ECP system to our standard Off-line ECP system using the Optia apheresis device and the MacoGenic G2 inactivation system (OM).
Study design and methods: We assessed the ECP products and procedure parameters, patient characteristics, and adverse events for both AB and OM systems in paired patients. Comparisons were made with t-test for paired samples.
Results: Thirteen patients underwent 15 double, paired procedures using both ECP protocols and processing the same blood volume of 4000 mL. Total MNC collected in the product were 51.6 × 108 (95% CI 30.0-73.1) and 42.2 × 108 (95% CI 22.4-62.0) for the AB and OM, respectively (not significant). Both products were also similar regarding volume, MNC concentration, purity, and hematocrit. However, total platelet count (×1011) was significantly lower in the AB products: 0.25 (95% CI 0.15-0.36) versus 1.2 (95% CI 0.9-1.5). The new AB system reduced significantly also the time invested and anticoagulant used per procedure compared with OM, albeit with similar collection efficiency and percentage of MNC captured per procedure. Hypocalcemia was the commonest adverse event with both systems, but it was not severe.
Conclusions: The new AB system collected MNC products comparable to our current experience with OM, although in a significantly shorter time, with a reduced use of anticoagulant and lower contamination with platelets, which are all valuable advantages of the new system.
期刊介绍:
TRANSFUSION is the foremost publication in the world for new information regarding transfusion medicine. Written by and for members of AABB and other health-care workers, TRANSFUSION reports on the latest technical advances, discusses opposing viewpoints regarding controversial issues, and presents key conference proceedings. In addition to blood banking and transfusion medicine topics, TRANSFUSION presents submissions concerning patient blood management, tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular, and gene therapies.