机器学习预测肺移植后原发性移植物功能障碍:一项可解释的模型研究。

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Transplantation Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1097/TP.0000000000005326
Wei Xia, Weici Liu, Zhao He, Chenghu Song, Jiwei Liu, Ruo Chen, Jingyu Chen, Xiaokun Wang, Hongyang Xu, Wenjun Mao
{"title":"机器学习预测肺移植后原发性移植物功能障碍:一项可解释的模型研究。","authors":"Wei Xia, Weici Liu, Zhao He, Chenghu Song, Jiwei Liu, Ruo Chen, Jingyu Chen, Xiaokun Wang, Hongyang Xu, Wenjun Mao","doi":"10.1097/TP.0000000000005326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) develops within 72 h after lung transplantation (Lung Tx) and greatly influences patients' prognosis. This study aimed to establish an accurate machine learning (ML) model for predicting grade 3 PGD (PGD3) after Lung Tx.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study incorporated 802 patients receiving Lung Tx between July 2018 and October 2023 (640 in the derivation cohort and 162 in the external validation cohort), and 640 patients were randomly assigned to training and internal validation cohorts in a 7:3 ratio. Independent risk factors for PGD3 were determined by integrating the univariate logistic regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression analyses. Subsequently, 9 ML models were used to construct prediction models for PGD3 based on selected variables. Their prediction performances were further evaluated. Besides, model stratification performance was assessed with 3 posttransplant metrics. Finally, the SHapley Additive exPlanations algorithm was used to understand the predictive importance of selected variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 9 independent clinical risk factors as selected variables. Among 9 ML models, the random forest (RF) model displayed optimal performance (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.9415, sensitivity [Se] = 0.8972, specificity [Sp] = 0.8795 in the training cohort; AUC = 0.7975, Se = 0.7520, Sp = 0.7313 in the internal validation cohort; and AUC = 0.8214, Se = 0.8235, Sp = 0.6667 in the external validation cohort). Further assessments on calibration and clinical usefulness indicated the promising applicability of the RF model in PGD3 prediction. Meanwhile, the RF model also performed best in terms of risk stratification for postoperative support (extracorporeal membrane oxygenation time: P < 0.001, mechanical ventilation time: P = 0.006, intensive care unit time: P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The RF model had the optimal performance in PGD3 prediction and postoperative risk stratification for patients after Lung Tx.</p>","PeriodicalId":23316,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine Learning for Predicting Primary Graft Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation: An Interpretable Model Study.\",\"authors\":\"Wei Xia, Weici Liu, Zhao He, Chenghu Song, Jiwei Liu, Ruo Chen, Jingyu Chen, Xiaokun Wang, Hongyang Xu, Wenjun Mao\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/TP.0000000000005326\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) develops within 72 h after lung transplantation (Lung Tx) and greatly influences patients' prognosis. This study aimed to establish an accurate machine learning (ML) model for predicting grade 3 PGD (PGD3) after Lung Tx.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study incorporated 802 patients receiving Lung Tx between July 2018 and October 2023 (640 in the derivation cohort and 162 in the external validation cohort), and 640 patients were randomly assigned to training and internal validation cohorts in a 7:3 ratio. Independent risk factors for PGD3 were determined by integrating the univariate logistic regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression analyses. Subsequently, 9 ML models were used to construct prediction models for PGD3 based on selected variables. Their prediction performances were further evaluated. Besides, model stratification performance was assessed with 3 posttransplant metrics. Finally, the SHapley Additive exPlanations algorithm was used to understand the predictive importance of selected variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 9 independent clinical risk factors as selected variables. Among 9 ML models, the random forest (RF) model displayed optimal performance (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.9415, sensitivity [Se] = 0.8972, specificity [Sp] = 0.8795 in the training cohort; AUC = 0.7975, Se = 0.7520, Sp = 0.7313 in the internal validation cohort; and AUC = 0.8214, Se = 0.8235, Sp = 0.6667 in the external validation cohort). Further assessments on calibration and clinical usefulness indicated the promising applicability of the RF model in PGD3 prediction. Meanwhile, the RF model also performed best in terms of risk stratification for postoperative support (extracorporeal membrane oxygenation time: P < 0.001, mechanical ventilation time: P = 0.006, intensive care unit time: P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The RF model had the optimal performance in PGD3 prediction and postoperative risk stratification for patients after Lung Tx.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000005326\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000005326","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:原发性移植物功能障碍(Primary graft dysfunction, PGD)发生于肺移植术后72 h内(lung Tx),严重影响患者预后。方法:回顾性研究纳入2018年7月至2023年10月期间接受肺Tx治疗的802例患者(衍生组640例,外部验证组162例),640例患者以7:3的比例随机分配到训练组和内部验证组。通过整合单变量logistic回归、最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归分析确定PGD3的独立危险因素。随后,利用9个ML模型构建基于选定变量的PGD3预测模型。进一步评价了它们的预测性能。此外,采用移植后3个指标评价模型分层性能。最后,使用SHapley加性解释算法来理解所选变量的预测重要性。结果:我们确定了9个独立的临床危险因素作为选择的变量。在9个ML模型中,随机森林(RF)模型在训练队列中表现最佳(曲线下面积[AUC] = 0.9415,灵敏度[Se] = 0.8972,特异性[Sp] = 0.8795;内部验证队列的AUC = 0.7975, Se = 0.7520, Sp = 0.7313;外部验证队列的AUC = 0.8214, Se = 0.8235, Sp = 0.6667)。对校准和临床有效性的进一步评估表明,RF模型在PGD3预测中具有良好的适用性。同时,RF模型在术后支持风险分层(体外膜氧合时间:P)方面也表现最佳。结论:RF模型在肺Tx术后患者PGD3预测和术后风险分层方面表现最佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Machine Learning for Predicting Primary Graft Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation: An Interpretable Model Study.

Background: Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) develops within 72 h after lung transplantation (Lung Tx) and greatly influences patients' prognosis. This study aimed to establish an accurate machine learning (ML) model for predicting grade 3 PGD (PGD3) after Lung Tx.

Methods: This retrospective study incorporated 802 patients receiving Lung Tx between July 2018 and October 2023 (640 in the derivation cohort and 162 in the external validation cohort), and 640 patients were randomly assigned to training and internal validation cohorts in a 7:3 ratio. Independent risk factors for PGD3 were determined by integrating the univariate logistic regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression analyses. Subsequently, 9 ML models were used to construct prediction models for PGD3 based on selected variables. Their prediction performances were further evaluated. Besides, model stratification performance was assessed with 3 posttransplant metrics. Finally, the SHapley Additive exPlanations algorithm was used to understand the predictive importance of selected variables.

Results: We identified 9 independent clinical risk factors as selected variables. Among 9 ML models, the random forest (RF) model displayed optimal performance (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.9415, sensitivity [Se] = 0.8972, specificity [Sp] = 0.8795 in the training cohort; AUC = 0.7975, Se = 0.7520, Sp = 0.7313 in the internal validation cohort; and AUC = 0.8214, Se = 0.8235, Sp = 0.6667 in the external validation cohort). Further assessments on calibration and clinical usefulness indicated the promising applicability of the RF model in PGD3 prediction. Meanwhile, the RF model also performed best in terms of risk stratification for postoperative support (extracorporeal membrane oxygenation time: P < 0.001, mechanical ventilation time: P = 0.006, intensive care unit time: P < 0.001).

Conclusions: The RF model had the optimal performance in PGD3 prediction and postoperative risk stratification for patients after Lung Tx.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transplantation
Transplantation 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.30%
发文量
1906
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of The Transplantation Society, and the International Liver Transplantation Society, Transplantation is published monthly and is the most cited and influential journal in the field, with more than 25,000 citations per year. Transplantation has been the trusted source for extensive and timely coverage of the most important advances in transplantation for over 50 years. The Editors and Editorial Board are an international group of research and clinical leaders that includes many pioneers of the field, representing a diverse range of areas of expertise. This capable editorial team provides thoughtful and thorough peer review, and delivers rapid, careful and insightful editorial evaluation of all manuscripts submitted to the journal. Transplantation is committed to rapid review and publication. The journal remains competitive with a time to first decision of fewer than 21 days. Transplantation was the first in the field to offer CME credit to its peer reviewers for reviews completed. The journal publishes original research articles in original clinical science and original basic science. Short reports bring attention to research at the forefront of the field. Other areas covered include cell therapy and islet transplantation, immunobiology and genomics, and xenotransplantation. ​
期刊最新文献
Kidney Transplant Outcomes in Amyloidosis: US National Database Study. All Cloak and No Dagger? Immunosuppression-free Lung Transplantation by Sustained Knockdown of Major Histocompatibility Complex Expression in the Graft. Metabolic Flexibility Predicts Response to Saroglitazar in Liver Transplant Recipients With Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease. Organ Transplantation in India: INDEED, for the Common Good! Photoacoustic Tomography Assessments During Ex Vivo Normothermic Perfusion. A Novel and Noninvasive Modality to Evaluate Endothelial Integrity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1