高剂量与低剂量催产素方案用于助产:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101604
Teresa C. Logue MD, MPH , Fabrizio Zullo MD , Fiamma van Biema MA , Moeun Son MD, MSCI , Lauren London MD , Sneha Paranandi MD , Anthony C. Sciscione DO , Giuseppe Rizzo MD , Daniele Di Mascio MD , Suneet P. Chauhan MD, Hon DSc
{"title":"高剂量与低剂量催产素方案用于助产:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Teresa C. Logue MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Fabrizio Zullo MD ,&nbsp;Fiamma van Biema MA ,&nbsp;Moeun Son MD, MSCI ,&nbsp;Lauren London MD ,&nbsp;Sneha Paranandi MD ,&nbsp;Anthony C. Sciscione DO ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Rizzo MD ,&nbsp;Daniele Di Mascio MD ,&nbsp;Suneet P. Chauhan MD, Hon DSc","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>This study aimed to assess whether high- vs low-dose oxytocin regimens for labor augmentation are associated with differential risk of low Apgar score, neonatal acidosis, and other adverse labor outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>DATA SOURCES</h3><div>We searched electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov) from inception up to March 2024 using combinations of the following key words: “oxytocin,” “oxytocin regimen,” “oxytocin protocol,” “oxytocin dosage,” “active management,” “high dose protocol,” “low dose protocol,” and “augmentation of labor.”</div></div><div><h3>STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA</h3><div>We included quasi-randomized and randomized controlled trials comparing continuous oxytocin infusion with high-dose regimens (intervention group) vs low-dose regimens (control group) in nulliparous or multiparous patients undergoing labor augmentation. High-dose regimens were defined as a starting oxytocin dose of ≥4 mU/min, increasing in increments of 3 to 7 mU/min every 15 to 40 minutes. Low-dose regimens were defined as a starting oxytocin dose of &lt;4 mU/min, increasing in increments of 1 to 2 mU/min every 15 to 40 minutes (PROSPERO CRD42024500197).</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>The coprimary outcomes were incidence of Apgar score &lt;7 at 5 minutes and umbilical arterial pH &lt;7.00. The secondary outcomes included cesarean delivery and chorioamnionitis. We performed random-effects head-to-head meta-analyses to compare high-dose with low-dose strategies, and reported summary risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>Ten randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials of 5508 pregnancies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. There was no difference in risk for the coprimary outcomes of Apgar score &lt;7 at 5 minutes (relative risk, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–1.46) and umbilical arterial pH &lt;7.00 (relative risk, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.50–1.20). There was also no difference in risk for cesarean delivery (relative risk, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.67–1.02). High-dose oxytocin regimens were associated with significantly lower risk of chorioamnionitis (relative risk, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.57–0.84; number needed to treat=25) and higher risk of tachysystole (relative risk, 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.21–1.43; <em>P</em>&lt;.001).</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>When used for labor augmentation, high-dose oxytocin regimens decreased the risk of chorioamnionitis compared with low-dose regimens without affecting the risk of low Apgar scores, neonatal acidosis, or cesarean delivery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":"7 2","pages":"Article 101604"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High- vs low-dose oxytocin regimens for labor augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Teresa C. Logue MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Fabrizio Zullo MD ,&nbsp;Fiamma van Biema MA ,&nbsp;Moeun Son MD, MSCI ,&nbsp;Lauren London MD ,&nbsp;Sneha Paranandi MD ,&nbsp;Anthony C. Sciscione DO ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Rizzo MD ,&nbsp;Daniele Di Mascio MD ,&nbsp;Suneet P. Chauhan MD, Hon DSc\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>This study aimed to assess whether high- vs low-dose oxytocin regimens for labor augmentation are associated with differential risk of low Apgar score, neonatal acidosis, and other adverse labor outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>DATA SOURCES</h3><div>We searched electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov) from inception up to March 2024 using combinations of the following key words: “oxytocin,” “oxytocin regimen,” “oxytocin protocol,” “oxytocin dosage,” “active management,” “high dose protocol,” “low dose protocol,” and “augmentation of labor.”</div></div><div><h3>STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA</h3><div>We included quasi-randomized and randomized controlled trials comparing continuous oxytocin infusion with high-dose regimens (intervention group) vs low-dose regimens (control group) in nulliparous or multiparous patients undergoing labor augmentation. High-dose regimens were defined as a starting oxytocin dose of ≥4 mU/min, increasing in increments of 3 to 7 mU/min every 15 to 40 minutes. Low-dose regimens were defined as a starting oxytocin dose of &lt;4 mU/min, increasing in increments of 1 to 2 mU/min every 15 to 40 minutes (PROSPERO CRD42024500197).</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>The coprimary outcomes were incidence of Apgar score &lt;7 at 5 minutes and umbilical arterial pH &lt;7.00. The secondary outcomes included cesarean delivery and chorioamnionitis. We performed random-effects head-to-head meta-analyses to compare high-dose with low-dose strategies, and reported summary risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>Ten randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials of 5508 pregnancies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. There was no difference in risk for the coprimary outcomes of Apgar score &lt;7 at 5 minutes (relative risk, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–1.46) and umbilical arterial pH &lt;7.00 (relative risk, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.50–1.20). There was also no difference in risk for cesarean delivery (relative risk, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.67–1.02). High-dose oxytocin regimens were associated with significantly lower risk of chorioamnionitis (relative risk, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.57–0.84; number needed to treat=25) and higher risk of tachysystole (relative risk, 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.21–1.43; <em>P</em>&lt;.001).</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>When used for labor augmentation, high-dose oxytocin regimens decreased the risk of chorioamnionitis compared with low-dose regimens without affecting the risk of low Apgar scores, neonatal acidosis, or cesarean delivery.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm\",\"volume\":\"7 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 101604\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589933325000059\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589933325000059","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估用于助产的高剂量与低剂量催产素方案是否与低Apgar评分、新生儿酸中毒和其他不良分娩结局的不同风险相关。数据来源:我们检索了电子数据库(MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov),检索时间从开始到2024年3月,使用以下关键词组合:“催产素”,“催产素方案”,“催产素方案”,“催产素剂量”,“主动管理”,“高剂量方案”,“低剂量方案”,“助产”。研究资格标准:我们纳入了准随机和随机对照试验,比较未产或多产患者在接受助产过程中持续使用高剂量方案(即干预组)和低剂量方案(即对照组)的催产素输注。高剂量方案定义为起始催产素剂量为4 mU/min或更高,每15至40分钟增加3-7 mU/min。低剂量方案定义为起始催产素剂量小于4 mU/min,每15 - 40分钟以1-2 mU/min的增量增加(PROSPERO CRD42024500197)。评价和综合方法:共主要结局为Apgar评分发生率。结果:10项随机和准随机对照试验共5508例妊娠符合纳入标准,纳入meta分析。结论:与低剂量催产素方案相比,用于助产时,高剂量催产素方案可降低绒毛膜羊膜炎的风险,而不影响低Apgar评分、新生儿酸中毒或剖宫产的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
High- vs low-dose oxytocin regimens for labor augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess whether high- vs low-dose oxytocin regimens for labor augmentation are associated with differential risk of low Apgar score, neonatal acidosis, and other adverse labor outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

We searched electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov) from inception up to March 2024 using combinations of the following key words: “oxytocin,” “oxytocin regimen,” “oxytocin protocol,” “oxytocin dosage,” “active management,” “high dose protocol,” “low dose protocol,” and “augmentation of labor.”

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We included quasi-randomized and randomized controlled trials comparing continuous oxytocin infusion with high-dose regimens (intervention group) vs low-dose regimens (control group) in nulliparous or multiparous patients undergoing labor augmentation. High-dose regimens were defined as a starting oxytocin dose of ≥4 mU/min, increasing in increments of 3 to 7 mU/min every 15 to 40 minutes. Low-dose regimens were defined as a starting oxytocin dose of <4 mU/min, increasing in increments of 1 to 2 mU/min every 15 to 40 minutes (PROSPERO CRD42024500197).

METHODS

The coprimary outcomes were incidence of Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes and umbilical arterial pH <7.00. The secondary outcomes included cesarean delivery and chorioamnionitis. We performed random-effects head-to-head meta-analyses to compare high-dose with low-dose strategies, and reported summary risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Ten randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials of 5508 pregnancies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. There was no difference in risk for the coprimary outcomes of Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes (relative risk, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–1.46) and umbilical arterial pH <7.00 (relative risk, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.50–1.20). There was also no difference in risk for cesarean delivery (relative risk, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.67–1.02). High-dose oxytocin regimens were associated with significantly lower risk of chorioamnionitis (relative risk, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.57–0.84; number needed to treat=25) and higher risk of tachysystole (relative risk, 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.21–1.43; P<.001).

CONCLUSION

When used for labor augmentation, high-dose oxytocin regimens decreased the risk of chorioamnionitis compared with low-dose regimens without affecting the risk of low Apgar scores, neonatal acidosis, or cesarean delivery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
254
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG) is a highly esteemed publication with two companion titles. One of these is the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Maternal-Fetal Medicine (AJOG MFM), which is dedicated to the latest research in the field of maternal-fetal medicine, specifically concerning high-risk pregnancies. The journal encompasses a wide range of topics, including: Maternal Complications: It addresses significant studies that have the potential to change clinical practice regarding complications faced by pregnant women. Fetal Complications: The journal covers prenatal diagnosis, ultrasound, and genetic issues related to the fetus, providing insights into the management and care of fetal health. Prenatal Care: It discusses the best practices in prenatal care to ensure the health and well-being of both the mother and the unborn child. Intrapartum Care: It provides guidance on the care provided during the childbirth process, which is critical for the safety of both mother and baby. Postpartum Issues: The journal also tackles issues that arise after childbirth, focusing on the postpartum period and its implications for maternal health. AJOG MFM serves as a reliable forum for peer-reviewed research, with a preference for randomized trials and meta-analyses. The goal is to equip researchers and clinicians with the most current information and evidence-based strategies to effectively manage high-risk pregnancies and to provide the best possible care for mothers and their unborn children.
期刊最新文献
The Role of Incorporating Maternal-Fetal Medicine Physicians onto Labor and Delivery in Reducing Maternal Morbidity. Intrauterine vacuum and balloon tamponade devices have similar rates of postpartum hemorrhage control: a retrospective cohort study. Intravenous calcium during spinal anesthesia in preeclamptic women receiving magnesium therapy. Is it not Time to Propose a Maternal-Fetal Definition of Fetal Growth Restriction specifically Linked to Maternal Vascular Malperfusion of the Placenta. Letter to The Editor in response to "Oxytocin regimen used for induction of labor and pregnancy outcomes".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1