钆造影剂成功应用于对碘造影剂过敏患者的分流支架置入术:1例报告。

IF 1.3 Q4 NEUROIMAGING Neuroradiology Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1177/19714009251313505
Shoji Saito, Hitoshi Hasegawa, Hayate Takahashi, Mamoru Ichinohe, Hiroki Seto, Ryosuke Mizuta, Keita Kawabe, Masakazu Sano, Makoto Oishi
{"title":"钆造影剂成功应用于对碘造影剂过敏患者的分流支架置入术:1例报告。","authors":"Shoji Saito, Hitoshi Hasegawa, Hayate Takahashi, Mamoru Ichinohe, Hiroki Seto, Ryosuke Mizuta, Keita Kawabe, Masakazu Sano, Makoto Oishi","doi":"10.1177/19714009251313505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gadolinium contrast medium can serve as an alternative to iodinated contrast medium when the latter is unsuitable. In this report, we describe a case of a carotid-ophthalmic aneurysm in which angiograms were obtained using gadolinium contrast medium for flow-diverter stent placement due to the patient's history of bronchial asthma and hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast medium. To enhance the visibility of gadolinium contrast medium, which typically provides lower contrast compared to iodinated contrast medium, we employed a contrast-enhancing and noise-reducing protocol on our image-guided therapy system. We performed catheterization and established working angles guided by a roadmap based on previous magnetic resonance angiography, the position of which was adjusted using cone-beam computed tomography performed before the intervention. This approach helped reduce the amount of contrast medium required. The procedure was successful and did not induce hypersensitivity reactions, morbidity, or mortality. Thus, the efficacy of the contrast-enhancing imaging protocol and the magnetic resonance angiography-based roadmap was confirmed. Measures must be taken to address gadolinium contrast medium-specific adverse events, limitations on the amount of contrast medium used, and the issue of low-contrast angiograms.</p>","PeriodicalId":47358,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"19714009251313505"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11707754/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Successful use of gadolinium contrast medium for flow-diverter stent placement in a patient with hypersensitivity to iodinated contrast: A case report.\",\"authors\":\"Shoji Saito, Hitoshi Hasegawa, Hayate Takahashi, Mamoru Ichinohe, Hiroki Seto, Ryosuke Mizuta, Keita Kawabe, Masakazu Sano, Makoto Oishi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19714009251313505\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Gadolinium contrast medium can serve as an alternative to iodinated contrast medium when the latter is unsuitable. In this report, we describe a case of a carotid-ophthalmic aneurysm in which angiograms were obtained using gadolinium contrast medium for flow-diverter stent placement due to the patient's history of bronchial asthma and hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast medium. To enhance the visibility of gadolinium contrast medium, which typically provides lower contrast compared to iodinated contrast medium, we employed a contrast-enhancing and noise-reducing protocol on our image-guided therapy system. We performed catheterization and established working angles guided by a roadmap based on previous magnetic resonance angiography, the position of which was adjusted using cone-beam computed tomography performed before the intervention. This approach helped reduce the amount of contrast medium required. The procedure was successful and did not induce hypersensitivity reactions, morbidity, or mortality. Thus, the efficacy of the contrast-enhancing imaging protocol and the magnetic resonance angiography-based roadmap was confirmed. Measures must be taken to address gadolinium contrast medium-specific adverse events, limitations on the amount of contrast medium used, and the issue of low-contrast angiograms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroradiology Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"19714009251313505\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11707754/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroradiology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009251313505\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009251313505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

钆造影剂在碘造影剂不适合时可作为碘造影剂的替代品。在本报告中,我们描述了一例眼颈动脉瘤病例,由于患者有支气管哮喘史和对碘造影剂的过敏反应,我们使用钆造影剂进行血管造影,以放置血流分流支架。钆造影剂通常比碘造影剂提供更低的对比度,为了提高其可见性,我们在图像引导治疗系统中采用了对比度增强和降噪方案。我们进行导管置入,并根据先前磁共振血管造影的路线图确定工作角度,在干预前使用锥形束计算机断层扫描调整其位置。这种方法有助于减少所需造影剂的量。手术是成功的,没有引起过敏反应,发病率或死亡率。因此,对比增强成像方案和基于磁共振血管造影的路线图的有效性得到了证实。必须采取措施解决钆造影剂特异性不良事件、造影剂用量的限制以及低对比度血管造影的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Successful use of gadolinium contrast medium for flow-diverter stent placement in a patient with hypersensitivity to iodinated contrast: A case report.

Gadolinium contrast medium can serve as an alternative to iodinated contrast medium when the latter is unsuitable. In this report, we describe a case of a carotid-ophthalmic aneurysm in which angiograms were obtained using gadolinium contrast medium for flow-diverter stent placement due to the patient's history of bronchial asthma and hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast medium. To enhance the visibility of gadolinium contrast medium, which typically provides lower contrast compared to iodinated contrast medium, we employed a contrast-enhancing and noise-reducing protocol on our image-guided therapy system. We performed catheterization and established working angles guided by a roadmap based on previous magnetic resonance angiography, the position of which was adjusted using cone-beam computed tomography performed before the intervention. This approach helped reduce the amount of contrast medium required. The procedure was successful and did not induce hypersensitivity reactions, morbidity, or mortality. Thus, the efficacy of the contrast-enhancing imaging protocol and the magnetic resonance angiography-based roadmap was confirmed. Measures must be taken to address gadolinium contrast medium-specific adverse events, limitations on the amount of contrast medium used, and the issue of low-contrast angiograms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroradiology Journal
Neuroradiology Journal NEUROIMAGING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal (formerly Rivista di Neuroradiologia) is the official journal of the Italian Association of Neuroradiology and of the several Scientific Societies from all over the world. Founded in 1988 as Rivista di Neuroradiologia, of June 2006 evolved in NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal. It is published bimonthly.
期刊最新文献
Photon-counting CT imaging of a patient with coiled and untreated intracranial saccular aneurysms. Woven EndoBridge 17 device for intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Outcome of acute ischemic stroke with absent opacification of the cervical internal carotid artery at CT-angiography after endovascular treatment. The teacher-mentee bond in medicine. Impact of workflow times on successful reperfusion after endovascular treatment in the late time window.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1