在网上寻找卫生信息时,接种疫苗受到许多线索的影响。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Health Information and Libraries Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1111/hir.12564
Mohammad Khojah, Mohammad Y Sarhan
{"title":"在网上寻找卫生信息时,接种疫苗受到许多线索的影响。","authors":"Mohammad Khojah, Mohammad Y Sarhan","doi":"10.1111/hir.12564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Much government response to improving vaccination uptake during the COVID-19 pandemic has focused on the problems of misinformation and disinformation. There may, however, be other signals within online health information that influence uptake of vaccination.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study identified the influence of various health information signals within online information communities on the intention of receiving the vaccine.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A deductive approach was used to derive constructs from signalling theory. Constructs were validated by a convenience sample using a questionnaire. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was used to evaluate the measurement model, the structural model and the multigroup analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis showed a significant impact of signals derived from past experience, information asymmetry and source credibility constructs on the perceived quality of the vaccine service. The perceived quality also had a significant impact on the intention to receive the vaccine.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Signalling theory was able to explain the importance of health information signals perceived from online platforms on the intention of individuals to receive the vaccine.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Information asymmetry between information provider and receiver, perceived credibility of sources and perceived quality of the vaccination service may influence decisions about vaccination.</p>","PeriodicalId":47580,"journal":{"name":"Health Information and Libraries Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vaccination uptake is influenced by many cues during health information seeking online.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Khojah, Mohammad Y Sarhan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hir.12564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Much government response to improving vaccination uptake during the COVID-19 pandemic has focused on the problems of misinformation and disinformation. There may, however, be other signals within online health information that influence uptake of vaccination.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study identified the influence of various health information signals within online information communities on the intention of receiving the vaccine.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A deductive approach was used to derive constructs from signalling theory. Constructs were validated by a convenience sample using a questionnaire. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was used to evaluate the measurement model, the structural model and the multigroup analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis showed a significant impact of signals derived from past experience, information asymmetry and source credibility constructs on the perceived quality of the vaccine service. The perceived quality also had a significant impact on the intention to receive the vaccine.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Signalling theory was able to explain the importance of health information signals perceived from online platforms on the intention of individuals to receive the vaccine.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Information asymmetry between information provider and receiver, perceived credibility of sources and perceived quality of the vaccination service may influence decisions about vaccination.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Information and Libraries Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Information and Libraries Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12564\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Information and Libraries Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12564","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在COVID-19大流行期间,政府对改善疫苗接种率的反应主要集中在错误信息和虚假信息的问题上。然而,在线健康信息中可能存在影响接种疫苗的其他信号。目的:本研究确定了在线信息社区中各种健康信息信号对接种疫苗意向的影响。方法:采用演绎法从信号理论中推导出结构。构念通过使用问卷的方便样本进行验证。采用结构方程模型(SEM)对测量模型、结构模型和多组分析进行评价。结果:分析显示,来自过去经验的信号、信息不对称和来源可信度构建对疫苗服务的感知质量有显著影响。感知到的质量对接种疫苗的意愿也有重大影响。讨论:信号理论能够解释从在线平台感知到的健康信息信号对个人接种疫苗意愿的重要性。结论:信息提供者和信息接受者之间的信息不对称、信息来源的感知可信度和疫苗接种服务的感知质量可能影响疫苗接种决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Vaccination uptake is influenced by many cues during health information seeking online.

Background: Much government response to improving vaccination uptake during the COVID-19 pandemic has focused on the problems of misinformation and disinformation. There may, however, be other signals within online health information that influence uptake of vaccination.

Objective: This study identified the influence of various health information signals within online information communities on the intention of receiving the vaccine.

Method: A deductive approach was used to derive constructs from signalling theory. Constructs were validated by a convenience sample using a questionnaire. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was used to evaluate the measurement model, the structural model and the multigroup analysis.

Results: The analysis showed a significant impact of signals derived from past experience, information asymmetry and source credibility constructs on the perceived quality of the vaccine service. The perceived quality also had a significant impact on the intention to receive the vaccine.

Discussion: Signalling theory was able to explain the importance of health information signals perceived from online platforms on the intention of individuals to receive the vaccine.

Conclusion: Information asymmetry between information provider and receiver, perceived credibility of sources and perceived quality of the vaccination service may influence decisions about vaccination.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Information and Libraries Journal
Health Information and Libraries Journal INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Health Information and Libraries Journal (HILJ) provides practitioners, researchers, and students in library and health professions an international and interdisciplinary forum. Its objectives are to encourage discussion and to disseminate developments at the frontiers of information management and libraries. A major focus is communicating practices that are evidence based both in managing information and in supporting health care. The Journal encompasses: - Identifying health information needs and uses - Managing programmes and services in the changing health environment - Information technology and applications in health - Educating and training health information professionals - Outreach to health user groups
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of educational interventions for improving healthcare professionals' information literacy: A systematic review. Understanding how and why users might use NHS repositories: A mixed methods study. Bridging the health information gap among undergraduate university students: The role of academic libraries. Vaccination uptake is influenced by many cues during health information seeking online. Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1