高收入国家南亚人常见精神障碍的解释模型:系统回顾。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Transcultural Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1177/13634615241296302
Ruchika Jain, Ritsuko Kakuma, Daisy R Singla, Kirsty Andresen, Khawater Bahkali, Abhijit Nadkarni
{"title":"高收入国家南亚人常见精神障碍的解释模型:系统回顾。","authors":"Ruchika Jain, Ritsuko Kakuma, Daisy R Singla, Kirsty Andresen, Khawater Bahkali, Abhijit Nadkarni","doi":"10.1177/13634615241296302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mental health service use by individuals of South Asian origin living outside of South Asia is influenced by cultural factors such as endorsing psycho-social-spiritual over biological explanations, somatisation, and stigma. The aim of this review is to synthesise the evidence about (a) explanatory models of common mental disorders (CMDs) among people of South Asian origin residing in high-income countries, and (b) their help-seeking for CMDs, including formal and informal care. The systematic review protocol was registered a priori on Prospero (registration number CRD42021287583). We ran extensive searches on explanatory models and help-seeking of people of South Asian origin across five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL), PsycINFO, and Global Health). We extracted the data and conducted a narrative synthesis. We included 33 reports and 29 studies (9,030 participants). The participants in the included studies viewed CMDs through a psychosocial rather than a biological lens (e.g., resulting from family issues vs. neurotransmitters). Causal attributions included life stressors and attitudinal and religious/spiritual factors. Commonly used help-seeking strategies included private coping (i.e., crying or praying), speaking to friends and family, and visiting their General Practitioner. We can conclude that cultural factors play an important role in how South Asian individuals experience and understand CMDs. To cope, they use pluralistic help-seeking strategies. Implications for clinical practice and policy include increasing research on the explanatory models of CMDs, involving family in services, and developing community-based interventions for individuals who do not engage with formal care.</p>","PeriodicalId":47864,"journal":{"name":"Transcultural Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"13634615241296302"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Explanatory models of common mental disorders among South Asians in high-income countries: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Ruchika Jain, Ritsuko Kakuma, Daisy R Singla, Kirsty Andresen, Khawater Bahkali, Abhijit Nadkarni\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13634615241296302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Mental health service use by individuals of South Asian origin living outside of South Asia is influenced by cultural factors such as endorsing psycho-social-spiritual over biological explanations, somatisation, and stigma. The aim of this review is to synthesise the evidence about (a) explanatory models of common mental disorders (CMDs) among people of South Asian origin residing in high-income countries, and (b) their help-seeking for CMDs, including formal and informal care. The systematic review protocol was registered a priori on Prospero (registration number CRD42021287583). We ran extensive searches on explanatory models and help-seeking of people of South Asian origin across five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL), PsycINFO, and Global Health). We extracted the data and conducted a narrative synthesis. We included 33 reports and 29 studies (9,030 participants). The participants in the included studies viewed CMDs through a psychosocial rather than a biological lens (e.g., resulting from family issues vs. neurotransmitters). Causal attributions included life stressors and attitudinal and religious/spiritual factors. Commonly used help-seeking strategies included private coping (i.e., crying or praying), speaking to friends and family, and visiting their General Practitioner. We can conclude that cultural factors play an important role in how South Asian individuals experience and understand CMDs. To cope, they use pluralistic help-seeking strategies. Implications for clinical practice and policy include increasing research on the explanatory models of CMDs, involving family in services, and developing community-based interventions for individuals who do not engage with formal care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transcultural Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"13634615241296302\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transcultural Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13634615241296302\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transcultural Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13634615241296302","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生活在南亚以外的南亚裔个人对心理健康服务的使用受到文化因素的影响,如认同心理-社会-精神而不是生物解释、躯体化和污名化。本综述的目的是综合以下方面的证据:(a)居住在高收入国家的南亚裔人群常见精神障碍(cmd)的解释模型,以及(b)他们寻求CMDs的帮助,包括正式和非正式护理。系统评价方案在Prospero上先验注册(注册号CRD42021287583)。我们在五个数据库(MEDLINE, Embase,护理和联合健康累积指数(CINAHL), PsycINFO和Global Health)中对南亚裔人群的解释模型和求助进行了广泛的搜索。我们提取数据并进行叙事合成。我们纳入了33篇报道和29项研究(9030名参与者)。在纳入的研究中,参与者通过社会心理而不是生物角度(例如,由家庭问题与神经递质引起)来看待cmd。因果归因包括生活压力因素、态度因素和宗教/精神因素。常用的求助策略包括私下应对(即哭泣或祈祷),与朋友和家人交谈,以及拜访他们的全科医生。我们可以得出结论,文化因素在南亚人如何体验和理解疾病方面发挥了重要作用。为了应对,他们使用多元化的求助策略。对临床实践和政策的影响包括增加对慢性病解释模型的研究,让家庭参与服务,以及为没有接受正规护理的个人制定基于社区的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Explanatory models of common mental disorders among South Asians in high-income countries: A systematic review.

Mental health service use by individuals of South Asian origin living outside of South Asia is influenced by cultural factors such as endorsing psycho-social-spiritual over biological explanations, somatisation, and stigma. The aim of this review is to synthesise the evidence about (a) explanatory models of common mental disorders (CMDs) among people of South Asian origin residing in high-income countries, and (b) their help-seeking for CMDs, including formal and informal care. The systematic review protocol was registered a priori on Prospero (registration number CRD42021287583). We ran extensive searches on explanatory models and help-seeking of people of South Asian origin across five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL), PsycINFO, and Global Health). We extracted the data and conducted a narrative synthesis. We included 33 reports and 29 studies (9,030 participants). The participants in the included studies viewed CMDs through a psychosocial rather than a biological lens (e.g., resulting from family issues vs. neurotransmitters). Causal attributions included life stressors and attitudinal and religious/spiritual factors. Commonly used help-seeking strategies included private coping (i.e., crying or praying), speaking to friends and family, and visiting their General Practitioner. We can conclude that cultural factors play an important role in how South Asian individuals experience and understand CMDs. To cope, they use pluralistic help-seeking strategies. Implications for clinical practice and policy include increasing research on the explanatory models of CMDs, involving family in services, and developing community-based interventions for individuals who do not engage with formal care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.00%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Transcultural Psychiatry is a fully peer reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles on cultural psychiatry and mental health. Cultural psychiatry is concerned with the social and cultural determinants of psychopathology and psychosocial treatments of the range of mental and behavioural problems in individuals, families and human groups. In addition to the clinical research methods of psychiatry, it draws from the disciplines of psychiatric epidemiology, medical anthropology and cross-cultural psychology.
期刊最新文献
Lockdown through a Chinese lens: A qualitative study. High-risk pregnant women's perceptions of their condition: A qualitative study with an emphasis on psychosocial need. Is personhood lost after mental illness? Exploring the dynamic interface between personhood and mental illness in Ghana. Explanatory models of common mental disorders among South Asians in high-income countries: A systematic review. Suicide and suicide behavior: A qualitative study in Telangana, India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1