证实DIVERT量表、CARS和EARLI预测日本家庭保健急诊科就诊:一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 1.8 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of General and Family Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1002/jgf2.738
Takao Ono, Hiroko Watase, Takuma Ishihara, Taketo Watase, Kiho Kang, Mitsunaga Iwata
{"title":"证实DIVERT量表、CARS和EARLI预测日本家庭保健急诊科就诊:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Takao Ono, Hiroko Watase, Takuma Ishihara, Taketo Watase, Kiho Kang, Mitsunaga Iwata","doi":"10.1002/jgf2.738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Detection of Indicators and Vulnerabilities for Emergency Room Trips (DIVERT) scale, the Community Assessment Risk Screen (CARS), and the Emergency Admission Risk Likelihood Index (EARLI) are scales that assess the risk of emergency department (ED) visits among home health care patients. This study validated these scales and explored factors that could improve their predictive accuracy among Japanese home health care patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. The primary outcome of unplanned ED visits was used to assess the validity of the DIVERT scale, CARS, and EARLI. Additionally, we examined whether the addition of patient age and receipt of advance care planning as variables on these assessments could enhance their precision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Altogether, 40 (17.8%) had at least one ED visit during the 6 months study period. In these patients, the DIVERT scale, CARS, and EARLI of the patients with ≥1 ED visit was superior compared with no ED visit (both <i>p</i> < 0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) of the DIVERT scale, CARS, and EARLI were 0.62, 0.59, and 0.60, respectively. Adding patient age and receipt of advance care planning improved the AUC in all three scales.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that these assessment scales could be applicable to home health care patients in Japan. Furthermore, adding age and receipt of advance care planning as variables was found to enhance the predictive accuracy of the scales.</p>","PeriodicalId":51861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General and Family Medicine","volume":"26 1","pages":"85-91"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11702461/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validating the DIVERT scales, CARS, and EARLI for predicting emergency department visits in home health care in Japan: A retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Takao Ono, Hiroko Watase, Takuma Ishihara, Taketo Watase, Kiho Kang, Mitsunaga Iwata\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jgf2.738\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Detection of Indicators and Vulnerabilities for Emergency Room Trips (DIVERT) scale, the Community Assessment Risk Screen (CARS), and the Emergency Admission Risk Likelihood Index (EARLI) are scales that assess the risk of emergency department (ED) visits among home health care patients. This study validated these scales and explored factors that could improve their predictive accuracy among Japanese home health care patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. The primary outcome of unplanned ED visits was used to assess the validity of the DIVERT scale, CARS, and EARLI. Additionally, we examined whether the addition of patient age and receipt of advance care planning as variables on these assessments could enhance their precision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Altogether, 40 (17.8%) had at least one ED visit during the 6 months study period. In these patients, the DIVERT scale, CARS, and EARLI of the patients with ≥1 ED visit was superior compared with no ED visit (both <i>p</i> < 0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) of the DIVERT scale, CARS, and EARLI were 0.62, 0.59, and 0.60, respectively. Adding patient age and receipt of advance care planning improved the AUC in all three scales.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that these assessment scales could be applicable to home health care patients in Japan. Furthermore, adding age and receipt of advance care planning as variables was found to enhance the predictive accuracy of the scales.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of General and Family Medicine\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"85-91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11702461/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of General and Family Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jgf2.738\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General and Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jgf2.738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急诊室就诊指标和脆弱性检测(DIVERT)量表、社区评估风险筛查(CARS)和急诊入院风险可能性指数(EARLI)是评估家庭保健患者急诊就诊风险的量表。本研究验证了这些量表,并探讨了可以提高日本家庭保健患者预测准确性的因素。方法:这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究。非计划ED就诊的主要结局用于评估DIVERT量表、CARS和EARLI的有效性。此外,我们还研究了在这些评估中加入患者年龄和接受预先护理计划作为变量是否可以提高其准确性。结果:在6个月的研究期间,总共有40例(17.8%)至少有一次急诊室就诊。在这些患者中,有≥1次ED就诊的患者的DIVERT量表、CARS和EARLI优于无ED就诊的患者(均为p)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,这些评估量表可以适用于日本的家庭保健患者。此外,增加年龄和接受提前护理计划作为变量被发现提高了量表的预测准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validating the DIVERT scales, CARS, and EARLI for predicting emergency department visits in home health care in Japan: A retrospective cohort study.

Background: The Detection of Indicators and Vulnerabilities for Emergency Room Trips (DIVERT) scale, the Community Assessment Risk Screen (CARS), and the Emergency Admission Risk Likelihood Index (EARLI) are scales that assess the risk of emergency department (ED) visits among home health care patients. This study validated these scales and explored factors that could improve their predictive accuracy among Japanese home health care patients.

Methods: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. The primary outcome of unplanned ED visits was used to assess the validity of the DIVERT scale, CARS, and EARLI. Additionally, we examined whether the addition of patient age and receipt of advance care planning as variables on these assessments could enhance their precision.

Results: Altogether, 40 (17.8%) had at least one ED visit during the 6 months study period. In these patients, the DIVERT scale, CARS, and EARLI of the patients with ≥1 ED visit was superior compared with no ED visit (both p < 0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) of the DIVERT scale, CARS, and EARLI were 0.62, 0.59, and 0.60, respectively. Adding patient age and receipt of advance care planning improved the AUC in all three scales.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that these assessment scales could be applicable to home health care patients in Japan. Furthermore, adding age and receipt of advance care planning as variables was found to enhance the predictive accuracy of the scales.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of General and Family Medicine
Journal of General and Family Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
79
审稿时长
48 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparison between point-of-care testing from capillary samples and conventional laboratory testing from venous samples for white blood cells and C-reactive protein in a pediatric outpatient setting. Risk stratification and diagnostic evaluation of patients found to have microscopic hematuria by their primary care providers. An overview of Hospital-at-home versus other models of care. Validating the DIVERT scales, CARS, and EARLI for predicting emergency department visits in home health care in Japan: A retrospective cohort study. Enhancing quality of care for older adults: The age-friendly health system (4Ms framework) and the role of general medicine physicians as system-based complexologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1