欧洲疝学会腹疝分类的评估及临床结果。

HCA healthcare journal of medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.36518/2689-0216.1542
Oluwatunmininu A Anwoju, Ashtyn Barrientes, Connor Hogan, Erik Askenasy, Jacob Greenberg, Keith Jerrod, Scott J Roth, Zuhair Ali, Mike K Liang
{"title":"欧洲疝学会腹疝分类的评估及临床结果。","authors":"Oluwatunmininu A Anwoju, Ashtyn Barrientes, Connor Hogan, Erik Askenasy, Jacob Greenberg, Keith Jerrod, Scott J Roth, Zuhair Ali, Mike K Liang","doi":"10.36518/2689-0216.1542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ventral hernias are a common but heterogeneous disease. Communication among key stakeholders (eg, patients, clinicians, administrators, payers, and researchers) can be augmented by a widely utilized classification system. The European Hernia Society (EHS) developed an expert-opinion-based hernia classification system organized by hernia type (primary versus incisional) and size. We sought to assess what components of the EHS ventral hernia classification system were correlated to real-world clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicenter cohort study. All hospitals contributing to the database were affiliated with 1 of 6 academic institutions. All adult patients who underwent ventral hernia repair over a 4-year period were included. The primary endpoint was adverse events defined as any major (deep or organ space) surgical site infection (SSI), abdominal reoperation, or hernia recurrence. Utilizing a multivariable Cox regression, factors associated with adverse events were identified. Accuracy was assessed using Harrell's C concordance statistic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2385 patients who underwent repair of ventral hernias (primary n = 810, 34.0% and incisional n = 1575, 66%), with a median follow-up of 11.1 months, 27.5% suffered adverse events including major SSIs (5.7%), hernia recurrences (12.1%), and abdominal reoperations (9.7%). In the overall cohort and the primary ventral hernia subgroup, all hernia-specific variables were associated with adverse events. American Society of Anesthesiologist score, low albumin, and prior SSI were associated with adverse events in the overall cohort and primary ventral hernia subgroup while surgical approach was associated with adverse events in the overall cohort and incisional ventral hernia subgroup. On multivariable Cox regression analyses, incisional ventral hernia and larger hernia width were independently associated with adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hernia size and type (primary versus incisional) from the EHS ventral hernia classification system were associated with clinical outcomes. Additional factors, including patient and operative factors, also impact outcomes. Our model allows key stakeholders to communicate more clearly regarding the challenges and outcomes of various patients with diverse ventral hernias.</p>","PeriodicalId":73198,"journal":{"name":"HCA healthcare journal of medicine","volume":"5 6","pages":"649-659"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11708935/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of the European Hernia Society Classification of Ventral Hernias and Clinical Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Oluwatunmininu A Anwoju, Ashtyn Barrientes, Connor Hogan, Erik Askenasy, Jacob Greenberg, Keith Jerrod, Scott J Roth, Zuhair Ali, Mike K Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.36518/2689-0216.1542\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ventral hernias are a common but heterogeneous disease. Communication among key stakeholders (eg, patients, clinicians, administrators, payers, and researchers) can be augmented by a widely utilized classification system. The European Hernia Society (EHS) developed an expert-opinion-based hernia classification system organized by hernia type (primary versus incisional) and size. We sought to assess what components of the EHS ventral hernia classification system were correlated to real-world clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicenter cohort study. All hospitals contributing to the database were affiliated with 1 of 6 academic institutions. All adult patients who underwent ventral hernia repair over a 4-year period were included. The primary endpoint was adverse events defined as any major (deep or organ space) surgical site infection (SSI), abdominal reoperation, or hernia recurrence. Utilizing a multivariable Cox regression, factors associated with adverse events were identified. Accuracy was assessed using Harrell's C concordance statistic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2385 patients who underwent repair of ventral hernias (primary n = 810, 34.0% and incisional n = 1575, 66%), with a median follow-up of 11.1 months, 27.5% suffered adverse events including major SSIs (5.7%), hernia recurrences (12.1%), and abdominal reoperations (9.7%). In the overall cohort and the primary ventral hernia subgroup, all hernia-specific variables were associated with adverse events. American Society of Anesthesiologist score, low albumin, and prior SSI were associated with adverse events in the overall cohort and primary ventral hernia subgroup while surgical approach was associated with adverse events in the overall cohort and incisional ventral hernia subgroup. On multivariable Cox regression analyses, incisional ventral hernia and larger hernia width were independently associated with adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hernia size and type (primary versus incisional) from the EHS ventral hernia classification system were associated with clinical outcomes. Additional factors, including patient and operative factors, also impact outcomes. Our model allows key stakeholders to communicate more clearly regarding the challenges and outcomes of various patients with diverse ventral hernias.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73198,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HCA healthcare journal of medicine\",\"volume\":\"5 6\",\"pages\":\"649-659\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11708935/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HCA healthcare journal of medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36518/2689-0216.1542\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HCA healthcare journal of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36518/2689-0216.1542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腹疝是一种常见但异质性的疾病。关键利益相关者(如患者、临床医生、管理人员、支付方和研究人员)之间的沟通可以通过广泛使用的分类系统得到加强。欧洲疝学会(EHS)开发了一个基于专家意见的疝分类系统,按疝类型(原发性与切口)和大小组织。我们试图评估EHS腹疝分类系统的哪些组成部分与现实世界的临床结果相关。方法:这是一项多中心队列研究。向数据库提供资料的所有医院均隶属于6个学术机构中的1个。所有4年内接受腹疝修补术的成年患者均被纳入研究。主要终点是不良事件,定义为任何主要(深部或器官间隙)手术部位感染(SSI)、腹部再手术或疝气复发。利用多变量Cox回归,确定与不良事件相关的因素。使用Harrell’s C一致性统计量评估准确性。结果:2385例腹疝修补患者(原发病例810例,占34.0%,切口病例1575例,占66%),中位随访11.1个月,27.5%的患者出现严重ssi(5.7%)、疝复发(12.1%)、腹部再手术(9.7%)等不良事件。在整个队列和原发性腹疝亚组中,所有疝气特异性变量都与不良事件相关。美国麻醉医师学会评分、低白蛋白和既往SSI与总体队列和原发性腹疝亚组的不良事件相关,而手术入路与总体队列和切口腹疝亚组的不良事件相关。在多变量Cox回归分析中,切口腹疝和较大的疝宽度与不良事件独立相关。结论:EHS腹疝分类系统的疝大小和类型(原发性和切口)与临床结果相关。其他因素,包括患者和手术因素,也会影响结果。我们的模型允许关键利益相关者更清楚地沟通关于不同类型腹疝患者的挑战和结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of the European Hernia Society Classification of Ventral Hernias and Clinical Outcomes.

Background: Ventral hernias are a common but heterogeneous disease. Communication among key stakeholders (eg, patients, clinicians, administrators, payers, and researchers) can be augmented by a widely utilized classification system. The European Hernia Society (EHS) developed an expert-opinion-based hernia classification system organized by hernia type (primary versus incisional) and size. We sought to assess what components of the EHS ventral hernia classification system were correlated to real-world clinical outcomes.

Methods: This was a multicenter cohort study. All hospitals contributing to the database were affiliated with 1 of 6 academic institutions. All adult patients who underwent ventral hernia repair over a 4-year period were included. The primary endpoint was adverse events defined as any major (deep or organ space) surgical site infection (SSI), abdominal reoperation, or hernia recurrence. Utilizing a multivariable Cox regression, factors associated with adverse events were identified. Accuracy was assessed using Harrell's C concordance statistic.

Results: Of the 2385 patients who underwent repair of ventral hernias (primary n = 810, 34.0% and incisional n = 1575, 66%), with a median follow-up of 11.1 months, 27.5% suffered adverse events including major SSIs (5.7%), hernia recurrences (12.1%), and abdominal reoperations (9.7%). In the overall cohort and the primary ventral hernia subgroup, all hernia-specific variables were associated with adverse events. American Society of Anesthesiologist score, low albumin, and prior SSI were associated with adverse events in the overall cohort and primary ventral hernia subgroup while surgical approach was associated with adverse events in the overall cohort and incisional ventral hernia subgroup. On multivariable Cox regression analyses, incisional ventral hernia and larger hernia width were independently associated with adverse events.

Conclusion: Hernia size and type (primary versus incisional) from the EHS ventral hernia classification system were associated with clinical outcomes. Additional factors, including patient and operative factors, also impact outcomes. Our model allows key stakeholders to communicate more clearly regarding the challenges and outcomes of various patients with diverse ventral hernias.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical Variant of Serpentine Supravenous Hyperpigmentation Following Subcutaneous Bortezomib Injection. Endovascular Repair of a Superior Mesenteric Arteriovenous Fistula and Pseudoaneurysm After a Single Gunshot Wound to the Abdomen. Evaluation of a Patient With a Severe Systemic Inflammatory Response to Nitrofurantoin. Investigating the Effects of Nosocomial Clostridioides difficile Infection Among Acute Leukemia Patients: Insights From the 2020 National Inpatient Sample. Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis in a Critically Ill Patient: A Case Report of a Potentially Fatal Entity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1