心理健康模拟技术在护理教育中的比较效果:系统回顾与元分析。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING International Journal of Mental Health Nursing Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1111/inm.13502
Xiaoyu Zhang, Hai Wang
{"title":"心理健康模拟技术在护理教育中的比较效果:系统回顾与元分析。","authors":"Xiaoyu Zhang,&nbsp;Hai Wang","doi":"10.1111/inm.13502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Simulation-based training in mental health is increasingly recognised as an effective tool within nursing education. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of various simulation modalities, including standardised participants (SPs), role-plays, virtual reality (VR), mannequins and voice simulations, in improving educational outcomes for nursing students. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify studies evaluating the impact of mental health simulation on nursing education. Data from 62 studies were extracted and analysed. The primary outcomes included knowledge, confidence, self-efficacy, competence and anxiety. Meta-analyses assessed both pretest/posttest changes and comparisons between simulation and control groups. Pretest/posttest analyses revealed significant improvements across multiple modalities: SPs enhanced knowledge (SMD = 1.26), confidence (SMD = 1.20), self-efficacy (SMD = 0.94), attitude (SMD = 0.22), competence (SMD = 2.30) and anxiety reduction (SMD = −0.88). Role-plays demonstrated gains in knowledge (SMD = 0.87), confidence (SMD = 1.24), self-efficacy (SMD = 0.74), attitude (SMD = 0.53), competence (SMD = 0.82) and reduced anxiety (SMD = −0.73). VR improved knowledge (SMD = 0.86), self-efficacy (SMD = 0.75) and competence (SMD = 0.69). Mannequins showed no significant changes in knowledge or competence. Voice simulations improved knowledge (SMD = 0.96). Comparisons with control groups indicated that SPs significantly increased knowledge (SMD = 1.31), competence (SMD = 1.51) and reduced anxiety (SMD = −2.01). Role-plays enhanced knowledge (SMD = 1.03) compared with inactive controls; VR increased knowledge (SMD = 0.86) compared with controls. Mannequins showed no significant differences, and voice simulations lacked sufficient data for comprehensive analysis. This meta-analysis underscores the value of simulation-based training in mental health nursing education, with SPs proving particularly effective in enhancing clinical preparedness. Role-plays, VR and voice simulations offer supplementary benefits but may require integration with more interactive methods for optimal impact. Future research should prioritise high-quality randomised controlled trials, standardised simulation protocols and long-term follow-up to clarify the sustained effects of simulation training on clinical practice.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14007,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Effectiveness of Mental Health Simulation Techniques in Nursing Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoyu Zhang,&nbsp;Hai Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/inm.13502\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Simulation-based training in mental health is increasingly recognised as an effective tool within nursing education. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of various simulation modalities, including standardised participants (SPs), role-plays, virtual reality (VR), mannequins and voice simulations, in improving educational outcomes for nursing students. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify studies evaluating the impact of mental health simulation on nursing education. Data from 62 studies were extracted and analysed. The primary outcomes included knowledge, confidence, self-efficacy, competence and anxiety. Meta-analyses assessed both pretest/posttest changes and comparisons between simulation and control groups. Pretest/posttest analyses revealed significant improvements across multiple modalities: SPs enhanced knowledge (SMD = 1.26), confidence (SMD = 1.20), self-efficacy (SMD = 0.94), attitude (SMD = 0.22), competence (SMD = 2.30) and anxiety reduction (SMD = −0.88). Role-plays demonstrated gains in knowledge (SMD = 0.87), confidence (SMD = 1.24), self-efficacy (SMD = 0.74), attitude (SMD = 0.53), competence (SMD = 0.82) and reduced anxiety (SMD = −0.73). VR improved knowledge (SMD = 0.86), self-efficacy (SMD = 0.75) and competence (SMD = 0.69). Mannequins showed no significant changes in knowledge or competence. Voice simulations improved knowledge (SMD = 0.96). Comparisons with control groups indicated that SPs significantly increased knowledge (SMD = 1.31), competence (SMD = 1.51) and reduced anxiety (SMD = −2.01). Role-plays enhanced knowledge (SMD = 1.03) compared with inactive controls; VR increased knowledge (SMD = 0.86) compared with controls. Mannequins showed no significant differences, and voice simulations lacked sufficient data for comprehensive analysis. This meta-analysis underscores the value of simulation-based training in mental health nursing education, with SPs proving particularly effective in enhancing clinical preparedness. Role-plays, VR and voice simulations offer supplementary benefits but may require integration with more interactive methods for optimal impact. Future research should prioritise high-quality randomised controlled trials, standardised simulation protocols and long-term follow-up to clarify the sustained effects of simulation training on clinical practice.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inm.13502\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inm.13502","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于模拟的心理健康培训越来越被认为是护理教育的有效工具。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估各种模拟模式的有效性,包括标准化参与者(SPs)、角色扮演、虚拟现实(VR)、人体模型和语音模拟,以改善护理学生的教育成果。我们进行了全面的文献检索,以确定评估心理健康模拟对护理教育影响的研究。从62项研究中提取并分析了数据。主要结局包括知识、自信、自我效能、能力和焦虑。meta分析评估了测试前/测试后的变化以及模拟组和对照组之间的比较。前测/后测分析显示了多种模式的显著改善:SPs增强了知识(SMD = 1.26)、信心(SMD = 1.20)、自我效能(SMD = 0.94)、态度(SMD = 0.22)、能力(SMD = 2.30)和焦虑减少(SMD = -0.88)。角色扮演表现出知识(SMD = 0.87)、信心(SMD = 1.24)、自我效能(SMD = 0.74)、态度(SMD = 0.53)、能力(SMD = 0.82)和焦虑(SMD = -0.73)的增加。VR提高了知识(SMD = 0.86)、自我效能(SMD = 0.75)和能力(SMD = 0.69)。人体模型在知识和能力方面没有明显的变化。语音模拟提高了知识(SMD = 0.96)。与对照组比较,SPs显著提高了知识水平(SMD = 1.31)、能力水平(SMD = 1.51)和焦虑水平(SMD = -2.01)。与不活跃的对照组相比,角色扮演增强了知识(SMD = 1.03);与对照组相比,VR增加了知识(SMD = 0.86)。人体模型没有显示出明显的差异,语音模拟缺乏足够的数据进行全面分析。本荟萃分析强调了心理健康护理教育中基于模拟的培训的价值,SPs在增强临床准备方面特别有效。角色扮演、虚拟现实和语音模拟提供了额外的好处,但可能需要与更多的互动方法相结合,以达到最佳效果。未来的研究应优先考虑高质量的随机对照试验、标准化的模拟方案和长期随访,以阐明模拟训练对临床实践的持续影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Effectiveness of Mental Health Simulation Techniques in Nursing Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Simulation-based training in mental health is increasingly recognised as an effective tool within nursing education. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of various simulation modalities, including standardised participants (SPs), role-plays, virtual reality (VR), mannequins and voice simulations, in improving educational outcomes for nursing students. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify studies evaluating the impact of mental health simulation on nursing education. Data from 62 studies were extracted and analysed. The primary outcomes included knowledge, confidence, self-efficacy, competence and anxiety. Meta-analyses assessed both pretest/posttest changes and comparisons between simulation and control groups. Pretest/posttest analyses revealed significant improvements across multiple modalities: SPs enhanced knowledge (SMD = 1.26), confidence (SMD = 1.20), self-efficacy (SMD = 0.94), attitude (SMD = 0.22), competence (SMD = 2.30) and anxiety reduction (SMD = −0.88). Role-plays demonstrated gains in knowledge (SMD = 0.87), confidence (SMD = 1.24), self-efficacy (SMD = 0.74), attitude (SMD = 0.53), competence (SMD = 0.82) and reduced anxiety (SMD = −0.73). VR improved knowledge (SMD = 0.86), self-efficacy (SMD = 0.75) and competence (SMD = 0.69). Mannequins showed no significant changes in knowledge or competence. Voice simulations improved knowledge (SMD = 0.96). Comparisons with control groups indicated that SPs significantly increased knowledge (SMD = 1.31), competence (SMD = 1.51) and reduced anxiety (SMD = −2.01). Role-plays enhanced knowledge (SMD = 1.03) compared with inactive controls; VR increased knowledge (SMD = 0.86) compared with controls. Mannequins showed no significant differences, and voice simulations lacked sufficient data for comprehensive analysis. This meta-analysis underscores the value of simulation-based training in mental health nursing education, with SPs proving particularly effective in enhancing clinical preparedness. Role-plays, VR and voice simulations offer supplementary benefits but may require integration with more interactive methods for optimal impact. Future research should prioritise high-quality randomised controlled trials, standardised simulation protocols and long-term follow-up to clarify the sustained effects of simulation training on clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
8.90%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing is the official journal of the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc. It is a fully refereed journal that examines current trends and developments in mental health practice and research. The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing provides a forum for the exchange of ideas on all issues of relevance to mental health nursing. The Journal informs you of developments in mental health nursing practice and research, directions in education and training, professional issues, management approaches, policy development, ethical questions, theoretical inquiry, and clinical issues. The Journal publishes feature articles, review articles, clinical notes, research notes and book reviews. Contributions on any aspect of mental health nursing are welcomed. Statements and opinions expressed in the journal reflect the views of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc.
期刊最新文献
Investigating the Suitability of the Forensic Mental Health Nursing Clinical Reasoning Cycle for Nurses Working in Generalist Mental Health Settings Promoting Personal Recovery Within Psychiatric Inpatient Care—Nurses' Experiences Understanding Perinatal Mental Health: A Systems Science Approach to Identify Common Drivers and Opportunities for Intervention Developing a Mobile App to Prevent Suicide Based on a Software Development Life Cycle: Application of Ecological Momentary Assessment and Interventions Graduate Nurses in Acute Mental Health Settings and Their Viewpoints of Nursing Education to Support Their Transition to Mental Health Nursing: A Q Methodology Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1