Shafaqat Ali, Yehya Khlidj, Manoj Kumar, Thannon Alsaeed, Faryal Farooq, Bijeta Keisham, Pramod Kumar Ponna, Sanchit Duhan, Vijaywant Brar, Malalai Manan, Mahin R Khan, Mohammad Alfrad Nobel Bhuiyan, Aviral Vij, Steve Attanasio, Arman Qamar, Tarek Helmy
{"title":"肾脏疾病对接受导管介入治疗中至高危肺栓塞患者的影响。","authors":"Shafaqat Ali, Yehya Khlidj, Manoj Kumar, Thannon Alsaeed, Faryal Farooq, Bijeta Keisham, Pramod Kumar Ponna, Sanchit Duhan, Vijaywant Brar, Malalai Manan, Mahin R Khan, Mohammad Alfrad Nobel Bhuiyan, Aviral Vij, Steve Attanasio, Arman Qamar, Tarek Helmy","doi":"10.1016/j.amjms.2025.01.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Catheter-directed interventions (CDIs) for pulmonary embolism (PE) continue to evolve. However, due to the paucity of data, their use has been limited in patients with underlying kidney disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The National Readmission Database (2016-2020) was utilized to identify intermediate to high-risk PE (IHR-PE) patients requiring CDI (thrombectomy, thrombolysis, and ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis). Cohorts were stratified based on the presence of CKD stage ≥3, including ESRD. A Propensity Score Matching (PSM) model was applied to compare outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2016-2020, 20795 patients with IHR-PE underwent CDIs. Most were done in the non-CKD/ESRD population (N:18438, 88.7 %), while only 2357 (11.3 %) were done in the CKD/ESRD population. After propensity matching, the CKD/ESRD population had higher adverse events, including mortality (7.3 % vs. 5.1 %, p: 0.036), need for transfusions (52.6 % vs. 44.7 %, p < 0.001), and acute bleeding (15.4 % vs. 10.6 %, p < 0.001). CKD/ESRD population had a higher median LOS (5 vs. 4 days, p < 0.001) and total cost ($32935 vs. $29805, p < 0.001) in the index admission. Over the study period, total cost decreased in the CKD/ESRD population ($37829 to $31436, p-trend: 0.024) but remained the same in the non-CKD/ESRD population (p-trend>0.05). 180-day readmission rates were higher in the CKD/ESRD population (24.7 % vs. 17.5 %, p: 0.006). Our subgroup analysis, excluding ESRD patients, showed no significant difference in in-hospital mortality (6.5 % vs. 7.3 %, p > 0.05), but the rates of thoracic or respiratory bleeding (4.5 % vs. 2.6 %, p:0.012), need for transfusions (52.4 % vs.. 43.5 %, p < 0.001), and AKI (57.1 % vs. 23.2 %, p < 0.001) were higher in patients with CKD undergoing CDIs for IHF-PE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CKD/ESRD patients requiring catheter-directed interventions for IHR-PE had higher periprocedural mortality and acute bleeding. The presence of ESRD mainly drove periprocedural mortality in our study, while the presence of non-dialyzed CKD was associated with higher rates of non-fatal localized hemorrhage.</p>","PeriodicalId":94223,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of the medical sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of kidney disease in patients undergoing catheter directed interventions for intermediate to high-risk pulmonary embolism.\",\"authors\":\"Shafaqat Ali, Yehya Khlidj, Manoj Kumar, Thannon Alsaeed, Faryal Farooq, Bijeta Keisham, Pramod Kumar Ponna, Sanchit Duhan, Vijaywant Brar, Malalai Manan, Mahin R Khan, Mohammad Alfrad Nobel Bhuiyan, Aviral Vij, Steve Attanasio, Arman Qamar, Tarek Helmy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjms.2025.01.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Catheter-directed interventions (CDIs) for pulmonary embolism (PE) continue to evolve. However, due to the paucity of data, their use has been limited in patients with underlying kidney disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The National Readmission Database (2016-2020) was utilized to identify intermediate to high-risk PE (IHR-PE) patients requiring CDI (thrombectomy, thrombolysis, and ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis). Cohorts were stratified based on the presence of CKD stage ≥3, including ESRD. A Propensity Score Matching (PSM) model was applied to compare outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2016-2020, 20795 patients with IHR-PE underwent CDIs. Most were done in the non-CKD/ESRD population (N:18438, 88.7 %), while only 2357 (11.3 %) were done in the CKD/ESRD population. After propensity matching, the CKD/ESRD population had higher adverse events, including mortality (7.3 % vs. 5.1 %, p: 0.036), need for transfusions (52.6 % vs. 44.7 %, p < 0.001), and acute bleeding (15.4 % vs. 10.6 %, p < 0.001). CKD/ESRD population had a higher median LOS (5 vs. 4 days, p < 0.001) and total cost ($32935 vs. $29805, p < 0.001) in the index admission. Over the study period, total cost decreased in the CKD/ESRD population ($37829 to $31436, p-trend: 0.024) but remained the same in the non-CKD/ESRD population (p-trend>0.05). 180-day readmission rates were higher in the CKD/ESRD population (24.7 % vs. 17.5 %, p: 0.006). Our subgroup analysis, excluding ESRD patients, showed no significant difference in in-hospital mortality (6.5 % vs. 7.3 %, p > 0.05), but the rates of thoracic or respiratory bleeding (4.5 % vs. 2.6 %, p:0.012), need for transfusions (52.4 % vs.. 43.5 %, p < 0.001), and AKI (57.1 % vs. 23.2 %, p < 0.001) were higher in patients with CKD undergoing CDIs for IHF-PE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CKD/ESRD patients requiring catheter-directed interventions for IHR-PE had higher periprocedural mortality and acute bleeding. The presence of ESRD mainly drove periprocedural mortality in our study, while the presence of non-dialyzed CKD was associated with higher rates of non-fatal localized hemorrhage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American journal of the medical sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American journal of the medical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2025.01.005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of the medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2025.01.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:肺栓塞(PE)的导管定向干预(cdi)不断发展。然而,由于缺乏数据,它们在患有潜在肾脏疾病的患者中的使用受到限制。方法:利用国家再入院数据库(2016-2020)识别需要CDI(取栓、溶栓和超声辅助溶栓)的中高危PE (IHR-PE)患者。根据CKD≥3期(包括ESRD)的存在对队列进行分层。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)模型比较结果。结果:2016-2020年,20795例IHR-PE患者接受了cdi。大多数是在非CKD/ESRD人群中进行的(N:18438, 88.7%),而只有2357(11.3%)在CKD/ESRD人群中进行。倾向匹配后,CKD/ESRD人群有更高的不良事件,包括死亡率(7.3%对5.1%,p: 0.036),需要输血(52.6%对44.7%,p0.05)。CKD/ESRD人群的180天再入院率更高(24.7%比17.5%,p: 0.006)。我们的亚组分析,不包括ESRD患者,显示住院死亡率无显著差异(6.5% vs. 7.3%, p >.05),但胸部或呼吸道出血率(4.5% vs. 2.6%, p:0.012),需要输血率(52.4% vs. 0.012)。结论:CKD/ESRD患者需要导管引导的IHR-PE干预有较高的围手术期死亡率和急性出血。在我们的研究中,ESRD的存在主要导致围手术期死亡率,而非透析性CKD的存在与非致死性局部出血的较高发生率相关。
Impact of kidney disease in patients undergoing catheter directed interventions for intermediate to high-risk pulmonary embolism.
Background: Catheter-directed interventions (CDIs) for pulmonary embolism (PE) continue to evolve. However, due to the paucity of data, their use has been limited in patients with underlying kidney disease.
Methods: The National Readmission Database (2016-2020) was utilized to identify intermediate to high-risk PE (IHR-PE) patients requiring CDI (thrombectomy, thrombolysis, and ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis). Cohorts were stratified based on the presence of CKD stage ≥3, including ESRD. A Propensity Score Matching (PSM) model was applied to compare outcomes.
Results: From 2016-2020, 20795 patients with IHR-PE underwent CDIs. Most were done in the non-CKD/ESRD population (N:18438, 88.7 %), while only 2357 (11.3 %) were done in the CKD/ESRD population. After propensity matching, the CKD/ESRD population had higher adverse events, including mortality (7.3 % vs. 5.1 %, p: 0.036), need for transfusions (52.6 % vs. 44.7 %, p < 0.001), and acute bleeding (15.4 % vs. 10.6 %, p < 0.001). CKD/ESRD population had a higher median LOS (5 vs. 4 days, p < 0.001) and total cost ($32935 vs. $29805, p < 0.001) in the index admission. Over the study period, total cost decreased in the CKD/ESRD population ($37829 to $31436, p-trend: 0.024) but remained the same in the non-CKD/ESRD population (p-trend>0.05). 180-day readmission rates were higher in the CKD/ESRD population (24.7 % vs. 17.5 %, p: 0.006). Our subgroup analysis, excluding ESRD patients, showed no significant difference in in-hospital mortality (6.5 % vs. 7.3 %, p > 0.05), but the rates of thoracic or respiratory bleeding (4.5 % vs. 2.6 %, p:0.012), need for transfusions (52.4 % vs.. 43.5 %, p < 0.001), and AKI (57.1 % vs. 23.2 %, p < 0.001) were higher in patients with CKD undergoing CDIs for IHF-PE.
Conclusion: CKD/ESRD patients requiring catheter-directed interventions for IHR-PE had higher periprocedural mortality and acute bleeding. The presence of ESRD mainly drove periprocedural mortality in our study, while the presence of non-dialyzed CKD was associated with higher rates of non-fatal localized hemorrhage.