Yao Christian Hugues Dokponou, Mohammed Yassaad Oudrhiri, Mahjouba Boutarbouch, Yasser Arkha, Adyl Melhaoui, Mehdi Hakkou, Abdeslam El Khamlichi, Abdessamad El Ouahabi
{"title":"脑中动脉瘤的剪接优先策略:一项单中心队列研究。","authors":"Yao Christian Hugues Dokponou, Mohammed Yassaad Oudrhiri, Mahjouba Boutarbouch, Yasser Arkha, Adyl Melhaoui, Mehdi Hakkou, Abdeslam El Khamlichi, Abdessamad El Ouahabi","doi":"10.25259/SNI_756_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management choice for the middle cerebral artery aneurysms (MCAAs) is still controversial. This review aims to describe a single-center \"clipping first\" policy for MCAA over 40 years of experience and compare the short- and long-term clinical outcomes by aneurysm's location.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study reviews the whole series of a single-center intracranial aneurysm mainly based on the micro-neurosurgical experience of the senior authors (EOA and EKA). More than 968 aneurysm patients were treated at the University Hospital \"Hôpital des Spécialités\" Ibn Sina of Rabat in Morocco since 1983. We have included aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients with the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) Grade ≤III (64.7% clipped; 6.9% coiled) and those with WFNS Grade ≥IV (27.5% clipped; 0.9% coiled).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the database of 1069 IAs in 968 patients, we depicted 218 (22.5%) patients carrying 279 (26.1%) MCAA. About 92.1% (<i>n</i> = 257) of the MCAAs were microsurgically clipped, and 96.3% (<i>n</i> = 210) were discharged with good outcomes (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] ≤2). In the <i>post hoc</i> test, the mean of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) (4.178) among the group of poor outcome patients (mRS >2) was significantly (<i>P</i> = 0.001) high compared to that of 0.827 good outcome patients (mRS ≤2). The negative correlation found between the dome/neck ratio and the mRS (Pearson's r = -0.023, 95%confidence interval [CI] 0.110--0.156) at admission (Pearson's r = -0.073, 95%CI 0.061--0.204) and at discharge confirmed that the wider the MCAA neck is, the more susceptible it is to have a poor prognosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The good clinical outcome from the microsurgically clipped patients is overwhelming and allows us to conclude that microsurgical treatment should be mostly considered for MCAA management. The patient's poor outcome with MCAA at discharge was significantly associated with ICH at admission in the frequency of 68.9%.</p>","PeriodicalId":94217,"journal":{"name":"Surgical neurology international","volume":"15 ","pages":"474"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705157/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clipping first policy for middle cerebral artery aneurysm: A single-center cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Yao Christian Hugues Dokponou, Mohammed Yassaad Oudrhiri, Mahjouba Boutarbouch, Yasser Arkha, Adyl Melhaoui, Mehdi Hakkou, Abdeslam El Khamlichi, Abdessamad El Ouahabi\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/SNI_756_2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management choice for the middle cerebral artery aneurysms (MCAAs) is still controversial. This review aims to describe a single-center \\\"clipping first\\\" policy for MCAA over 40 years of experience and compare the short- and long-term clinical outcomes by aneurysm's location.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study reviews the whole series of a single-center intracranial aneurysm mainly based on the micro-neurosurgical experience of the senior authors (EOA and EKA). More than 968 aneurysm patients were treated at the University Hospital \\\"Hôpital des Spécialités\\\" Ibn Sina of Rabat in Morocco since 1983. We have included aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients with the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) Grade ≤III (64.7% clipped; 6.9% coiled) and those with WFNS Grade ≥IV (27.5% clipped; 0.9% coiled).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the database of 1069 IAs in 968 patients, we depicted 218 (22.5%) patients carrying 279 (26.1%) MCAA. About 92.1% (<i>n</i> = 257) of the MCAAs were microsurgically clipped, and 96.3% (<i>n</i> = 210) were discharged with good outcomes (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] ≤2). In the <i>post hoc</i> test, the mean of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) (4.178) among the group of poor outcome patients (mRS >2) was significantly (<i>P</i> = 0.001) high compared to that of 0.827 good outcome patients (mRS ≤2). The negative correlation found between the dome/neck ratio and the mRS (Pearson's r = -0.023, 95%confidence interval [CI] 0.110--0.156) at admission (Pearson's r = -0.073, 95%CI 0.061--0.204) and at discharge confirmed that the wider the MCAA neck is, the more susceptible it is to have a poor prognosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The good clinical outcome from the microsurgically clipped patients is overwhelming and allows us to conclude that microsurgical treatment should be mostly considered for MCAA management. The patient's poor outcome with MCAA at discharge was significantly associated with ICH at admission in the frequency of 68.9%.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical neurology international\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"474\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705157/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical neurology international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_756_2024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical neurology international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_756_2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:大脑中动脉瘤(MCAAs)的治疗选择仍存在争议。本综述旨在描述40多年来MCAA的单中心“切除优先”政策,并根据动脉瘤的位置比较短期和长期临床结果。方法:本回顾性队列研究主要基于资深作者(EOA和EKA)的显微神经外科经验,回顾了单中心颅内动脉瘤的全系列。自1983年以来,超过968名动脉瘤患者在摩洛哥拉巴特的伊本·西那大学医院“Hôpital des spsamcialitsamas”接受了治疗。我们纳入了世界神经外科学会联合会(WFNS)分级≤III级的动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者(64.7%为夹闭;WFNS分级≥IV的患者(27.5%为夹持;盘绕的0.9%)。结果:从968例患者的1069例IAs数据库中,我们描述了218例(22.5%)患者携带279例(26.1%)MCAA。92.1% (n = 257)的mcaa被显微手术夹断,96.3% (n = 210)的mcaa出院,预后良好(改良Rankin量表[mRS]≤2)。事后检验中,预后差(mRS≤2)组脑出血(ICH)均值(4.178)明显高于预后好(mRS≤2)组(0.827)(P = 0.001)。入院时(Pearson’s r = -0.023, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.110—0.156)和出院时,圆颈比与mRS呈负相关(Pearson’s r = -0.073, 95%CI 0.061—0.204),证实MCAA颈部越宽,越容易出现不良预后。结论:显微手术夹夹患者临床效果良好,结论MCAA的治疗应以显微手术为主。患者出院时MCAA不良预后与入院时脑出血显著相关,发生率为68.9%。
Clipping first policy for middle cerebral artery aneurysm: A single-center cohort study.
Background: The management choice for the middle cerebral artery aneurysms (MCAAs) is still controversial. This review aims to describe a single-center "clipping first" policy for MCAA over 40 years of experience and compare the short- and long-term clinical outcomes by aneurysm's location.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study reviews the whole series of a single-center intracranial aneurysm mainly based on the micro-neurosurgical experience of the senior authors (EOA and EKA). More than 968 aneurysm patients were treated at the University Hospital "Hôpital des Spécialités" Ibn Sina of Rabat in Morocco since 1983. We have included aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients with the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) Grade ≤III (64.7% clipped; 6.9% coiled) and those with WFNS Grade ≥IV (27.5% clipped; 0.9% coiled).
Results: From the database of 1069 IAs in 968 patients, we depicted 218 (22.5%) patients carrying 279 (26.1%) MCAA. About 92.1% (n = 257) of the MCAAs were microsurgically clipped, and 96.3% (n = 210) were discharged with good outcomes (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] ≤2). In the post hoc test, the mean of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) (4.178) among the group of poor outcome patients (mRS >2) was significantly (P = 0.001) high compared to that of 0.827 good outcome patients (mRS ≤2). The negative correlation found between the dome/neck ratio and the mRS (Pearson's r = -0.023, 95%confidence interval [CI] 0.110--0.156) at admission (Pearson's r = -0.073, 95%CI 0.061--0.204) and at discharge confirmed that the wider the MCAA neck is, the more susceptible it is to have a poor prognosis.
Conclusion: The good clinical outcome from the microsurgically clipped patients is overwhelming and allows us to conclude that microsurgical treatment should be mostly considered for MCAA management. The patient's poor outcome with MCAA at discharge was significantly associated with ICH at admission in the frequency of 68.9%.