Lawrence A Lavery, Mehmet A Suludere, Kathryn Raspovic, Peter Andrew Crisologo, Matthew J Johnson, Arthur N Tarricone
{"title":"比较羊膜异体移植每周一次与两周一次治疗糖尿病足溃疡的随机对照试验。","authors":"Lawrence A Lavery, Mehmet A Suludere, Kathryn Raspovic, Peter Andrew Crisologo, Matthew J Johnson, Arthur N Tarricone","doi":"10.1177/15347346241276697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our objective was to compare clinical outcomes in diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) treated with AmnioExcel<sup>®</sup> applied weekly (AMX1) or biweekly (AMX2) over a 12-week evaluation period. This randomized clinical trial evaluated 40 people with UT 1A and 1D DFUs >30 days but less than 6 months duration and age >21 years. We excluded patients with untreated osteomyelitis, gangrene, widespread malignancy, or active substance abuse. Patients received amniotic tissue either once a week or every other week. We used a 3D measurement device (inSight, eKare, Fairfax, Virginia)\". There was no difference in the incidence of healing (AMX1 30.0% vs AMX2 50.0%, p = 0.20), time to heal (69.3 ± 30.3 vs 45.8 ± 25.6 days, p = 0.15), or incidence of infection (AMX1 35.0% vs AMX2 25.0%, p = 0.49). The mean wound area reduction was 0.18 ± 0.48 cm<sup>2</sup> per week for AMX1 and 0.15 ± 0.63 cm<sup>2</sup> week for AMX2 (p = 0.42). When we compared wound healing trajectories in healers and non-healers. There were no differences in the mean wound area reduction for healers (0.26 ± 0.40 cm<sup>2</sup> per week) and non-healers (0.14 ± 0.52 cm<sup>2</sup> per week, p = 0.20). Our results suggested there is no difference in the incidence of healing, time to heal or incidence of infection based on weekly or biweekly application of amniotic tissue.</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":" ","pages":"15347346241276697"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare AmnioExcel Human Amniotic Allograft in Weekly Versus Biweekly Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers.\",\"authors\":\"Lawrence A Lavery, Mehmet A Suludere, Kathryn Raspovic, Peter Andrew Crisologo, Matthew J Johnson, Arthur N Tarricone\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15347346241276697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Our objective was to compare clinical outcomes in diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) treated with AmnioExcel<sup>®</sup> applied weekly (AMX1) or biweekly (AMX2) over a 12-week evaluation period. This randomized clinical trial evaluated 40 people with UT 1A and 1D DFUs >30 days but less than 6 months duration and age >21 years. We excluded patients with untreated osteomyelitis, gangrene, widespread malignancy, or active substance abuse. Patients received amniotic tissue either once a week or every other week. We used a 3D measurement device (inSight, eKare, Fairfax, Virginia)\\\". There was no difference in the incidence of healing (AMX1 30.0% vs AMX2 50.0%, p = 0.20), time to heal (69.3 ± 30.3 vs 45.8 ± 25.6 days, p = 0.15), or incidence of infection (AMX1 35.0% vs AMX2 25.0%, p = 0.49). The mean wound area reduction was 0.18 ± 0.48 cm<sup>2</sup> per week for AMX1 and 0.15 ± 0.63 cm<sup>2</sup> week for AMX2 (p = 0.42). When we compared wound healing trajectories in healers and non-healers. There were no differences in the mean wound area reduction for healers (0.26 ± 0.40 cm<sup>2</sup> per week) and non-healers (0.14 ± 0.52 cm<sup>2</sup> per week, p = 0.20). Our results suggested there is no difference in the incidence of healing, time to heal or incidence of infection based on weekly or biweekly application of amniotic tissue.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The international journal of lower extremity wounds\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15347346241276697\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The international journal of lower extremity wounds\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346241276697\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346241276697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们的目的是在为期12周的评估期内,比较每周一次(AMX1)或两周一次(AMX2)应用AmnioExcel®治疗糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)的临床结果。这项随机临床试验评估了40名患有ut1a和1D DFUs的患者,这些患者持续时间为30天,但持续时间小于6个月,年龄为21岁。我们排除了未经治疗的骨髓炎、坏疽、广泛的恶性肿瘤或药物滥用的患者。患者每周或每隔一周接受一次羊膜组织。我们使用了3D测量设备(inSight, eKare, Fairfax, Virginia)”。两组的愈合率(AMX1 30.0% vs AMX2 50.0%, p = 0.20)、愈合时间(69.3±30.3 vs 45.8±25.6 d, p = 0.15)、感染发生率(AMX1 35.0% vs AMX2 25.0%, p = 0.49)均无差异。AMX1的平均创面面积减少0.18±0.48 cm2 /周,AMX2的平均创面面积减少0.15±0.63 cm2 /周(p = 0.42)。当我们比较治疗者和非治疗者的伤口愈合轨迹时。愈合组和非愈合组的平均伤口面积减少(0.26±0.40 cm2 /周)和0.14±0.52 cm2 /周,p = 0.20)无差异。我们的结果表明,每周一次或两周应用羊膜组织在愈合率、愈合时间或感染发生率方面没有差异。
Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare AmnioExcel Human Amniotic Allograft in Weekly Versus Biweekly Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers.
Our objective was to compare clinical outcomes in diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) treated with AmnioExcel® applied weekly (AMX1) or biweekly (AMX2) over a 12-week evaluation period. This randomized clinical trial evaluated 40 people with UT 1A and 1D DFUs >30 days but less than 6 months duration and age >21 years. We excluded patients with untreated osteomyelitis, gangrene, widespread malignancy, or active substance abuse. Patients received amniotic tissue either once a week or every other week. We used a 3D measurement device (inSight, eKare, Fairfax, Virginia)". There was no difference in the incidence of healing (AMX1 30.0% vs AMX2 50.0%, p = 0.20), time to heal (69.3 ± 30.3 vs 45.8 ± 25.6 days, p = 0.15), or incidence of infection (AMX1 35.0% vs AMX2 25.0%, p = 0.49). The mean wound area reduction was 0.18 ± 0.48 cm2 per week for AMX1 and 0.15 ± 0.63 cm2 week for AMX2 (p = 0.42). When we compared wound healing trajectories in healers and non-healers. There were no differences in the mean wound area reduction for healers (0.26 ± 0.40 cm2 per week) and non-healers (0.14 ± 0.52 cm2 per week, p = 0.20). Our results suggested there is no difference in the incidence of healing, time to heal or incidence of infection based on weekly or biweekly application of amniotic tissue.