Szu-Hao Andrew Liu, Cheng-Chia Lee, Huai-Che Yang, Wei-Lun Huang, Yu-Hsien Huang, Wen-Yuh Chung, Hon-Yi Shi
{"title":"GKRS加TKIs与TKIs在egfr突变型肺腺癌和脑转移患者中的临床结果和成本效用分析:马尔科夫决策模型","authors":"Szu-Hao Andrew Liu, Cheng-Chia Lee, Huai-Che Yang, Wei-Lun Huang, Yu-Hsien Huang, Wen-Yuh Chung, Hon-Yi Shi","doi":"10.3171/2024.7.JNS24310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study focuses on epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated lung adenocarcinoma, known for frequent brain metastasis. It aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of combining Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (GKRS+TKI group) versus TKIs alone (TKI group) for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed brain metastasis in this condition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Study characteristics of the two groups were matched using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). In the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) model, a healthcare provider perspective, a 1-month cycle length, a 5-year time horizon, and a discount rate of 2% per year for both effectiveness and costs were adopted. Probabilistic and one-way sensitivity analyses were also conducted to demonstrate the robustness of the findings. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS version 23.0, and cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using TreeAge Pro software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After applying IPTW, the GKRS+TKI group included 205 patients, and the TKI group consisted of 102 patients, with no statistically significant differences in whole confounders. The GKRS+TKI group demonstrated significantly prolonged median progression-free survival (37.5 months vs 10.6 months, p < 0.001) and median overall survival (55.1 months vs 30.8 months, p < 0.001) compared with the TKI group. The GKRS plus TKI strategy achieved an ICUR of $30,532.25 per quality-adjusted life year relative to the TKIs at the willingness-to-pay threshold of US$33,059 (Taiwan's per capita gross domestic product).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of GKRS plus TKIs not only reduces disease recurrence and improves prognosis but also demonstrates a higher level of cost-effectiveness. These findings offer valuable guidelines for clinicians and inform healthcare authorities in optimizing resource allocation for improved medical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical outcomes and cost-utility analysis of GKRS plus TKIs versus TKIs in patients with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma and brain metastases: a Markov decision model.\",\"authors\":\"Szu-Hao Andrew Liu, Cheng-Chia Lee, Huai-Che Yang, Wei-Lun Huang, Yu-Hsien Huang, Wen-Yuh Chung, Hon-Yi Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2024.7.JNS24310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study focuses on epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated lung adenocarcinoma, known for frequent brain metastasis. It aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of combining Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (GKRS+TKI group) versus TKIs alone (TKI group) for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed brain metastasis in this condition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Study characteristics of the two groups were matched using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). In the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) model, a healthcare provider perspective, a 1-month cycle length, a 5-year time horizon, and a discount rate of 2% per year for both effectiveness and costs were adopted. Probabilistic and one-way sensitivity analyses were also conducted to demonstrate the robustness of the findings. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS version 23.0, and cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using TreeAge Pro software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After applying IPTW, the GKRS+TKI group included 205 patients, and the TKI group consisted of 102 patients, with no statistically significant differences in whole confounders. The GKRS+TKI group demonstrated significantly prolonged median progression-free survival (37.5 months vs 10.6 months, p < 0.001) and median overall survival (55.1 months vs 30.8 months, p < 0.001) compared with the TKI group. The GKRS plus TKI strategy achieved an ICUR of $30,532.25 per quality-adjusted life year relative to the TKIs at the willingness-to-pay threshold of US$33,059 (Taiwan's per capita gross domestic product).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of GKRS plus TKIs not only reduces disease recurrence and improves prognosis but also demonstrates a higher level of cost-effectiveness. These findings offer valuable guidelines for clinicians and inform healthcare authorities in optimizing resource allocation for improved medical care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.7.JNS24310\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.7.JNS24310","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究的重点是表皮生长因子受体突变的肺腺癌,已知的频繁脑转移。该研究旨在比较伽玛刀放射手术(GKRS)联合酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs) (GKRS+TKI组)与单独TKIs (TKI组)治疗新诊断脑转移患者的临床结果和成本效益。方法:采用治疗加权逆概率法(inverse probability of treatment weighting, IPTW)对两组患者的研究特征进行匹配。在增量成本效用比(ICUR)模型中,从医疗保健提供者的角度出发,采用1个月的周期长度、5年的时间范围以及每年2%的有效性和成本贴现率。还进行了概率和单向敏感性分析,以证明研究结果的稳健性。采用IBM SPSS 23.0进行统计分析,采用TreeAge Pro软件进行成本-效果分析。结果:应用IPTW后,GKRS+TKI组有205例患者,TKI组有102例患者,全混杂因素差异无统计学意义。与TKI组相比,GKRS+TKI组的中位无进展生存期(37.5个月vs 10.6个月,p < 0.001)和中位总生存期(55.1个月vs 30.8个月,p < 0.001)显著延长。GKRS + TKI策略在每个质量调整生命年实现了30,532.25美元的ICUR,而TKI的支付意愿阈值为33,059美元(台湾人均国内生产总值)。结论:GKRS联合TKIs不仅可以减少疾病复发,改善预后,而且具有较高的成本-效果。这些发现为临床医生提供了有价值的指导方针,并告知卫生保健当局优化资源分配,以改善医疗保健。
Clinical outcomes and cost-utility analysis of GKRS plus TKIs versus TKIs in patients with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma and brain metastases: a Markov decision model.
Objective: This study focuses on epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated lung adenocarcinoma, known for frequent brain metastasis. It aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of combining Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (GKRS+TKI group) versus TKIs alone (TKI group) for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed brain metastasis in this condition.
Methods: Study characteristics of the two groups were matched using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). In the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) model, a healthcare provider perspective, a 1-month cycle length, a 5-year time horizon, and a discount rate of 2% per year for both effectiveness and costs were adopted. Probabilistic and one-way sensitivity analyses were also conducted to demonstrate the robustness of the findings. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS version 23.0, and cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using TreeAge Pro software.
Results: After applying IPTW, the GKRS+TKI group included 205 patients, and the TKI group consisted of 102 patients, with no statistically significant differences in whole confounders. The GKRS+TKI group demonstrated significantly prolonged median progression-free survival (37.5 months vs 10.6 months, p < 0.001) and median overall survival (55.1 months vs 30.8 months, p < 0.001) compared with the TKI group. The GKRS plus TKI strategy achieved an ICUR of $30,532.25 per quality-adjusted life year relative to the TKIs at the willingness-to-pay threshold of US$33,059 (Taiwan's per capita gross domestic product).
Conclusions: The use of GKRS plus TKIs not only reduces disease recurrence and improves prognosis but also demonstrates a higher level of cost-effectiveness. These findings offer valuable guidelines for clinicians and inform healthcare authorities in optimizing resource allocation for improved medical care.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.