{"title":"持续使用托法替尼而非非歌替尼对无反应的活动性溃疡性结肠炎有效:倾向评分匹配分析","authors":"Soichi Yagi, Hirokazu Fukui, Maiko Ikenouchi, Tetsuya Shiraishi, Koji Kaku, Midori Wakita, Yasuhiro Takagi, Toshiyuki Sato, Mikio Kawai, Koji Kamikozuru, Yoko Yokoyama, Tetsuya Takagawa, Toshihiko Tomita, Shinichiro Shinzaki","doi":"10.3390/jcm14010217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Few studies have compared the efficacy and safety of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). We compared the real-world effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib (TOF) and filgotinib (FIL) as induction therapy for UC by propensity score-matching analysis. <b>Methods:</b> We enrolled 230 patients with active UC who received either TOF (n = 197) or FIL (n = 33) as induction therapy. The primary outcome was the clinical response at week 8, and the secondary outcomes were the clinical response/remission rates from weeks 2-8, including the course of patients without a clinical response/remission at week 4. <b>Results:</b> Propensity score-matching analysis revealed that the clinical response rate gradually increased to 72.2% at 8 weeks in the TOF group, whereas it tended to decrease to 48.5% in the FIL group. Clinical remission rates increased from 2 (36.7% vs. 36.7%) to 8 weeks (63.6% vs. 48.5%) after treatment in the TOF and FIL groups, respectively. The clinical response rate was higher in the TOF group than in the FIL group at week 8 in patients without a clinical response at week 4 (38.5% vs. 0%; <i>p</i> = 0.011). The clinical remission rate was also higher in the TOF group than in the FIL group at week 8 in patients without clinical remission at week 4 (50.0% vs. 16.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.046). The incident rates of infection and anemia were higher in the TOF group than in the FIL group. <b>Conclusions:</b> TOF may be more effective than FIL at 8 weeks for patients with UC who do not respond to treatment within the first 4 weeks.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11721360/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continuous Treatment with Tofacitinib but Not Filgotinib Is Effective in Non-Responders with Active Ulcerative Colitis: A Propensity Score-Matching Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Soichi Yagi, Hirokazu Fukui, Maiko Ikenouchi, Tetsuya Shiraishi, Koji Kaku, Midori Wakita, Yasuhiro Takagi, Toshiyuki Sato, Mikio Kawai, Koji Kamikozuru, Yoko Yokoyama, Tetsuya Takagawa, Toshihiko Tomita, Shinichiro Shinzaki\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jcm14010217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Few studies have compared the efficacy and safety of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). We compared the real-world effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib (TOF) and filgotinib (FIL) as induction therapy for UC by propensity score-matching analysis. <b>Methods:</b> We enrolled 230 patients with active UC who received either TOF (n = 197) or FIL (n = 33) as induction therapy. The primary outcome was the clinical response at week 8, and the secondary outcomes were the clinical response/remission rates from weeks 2-8, including the course of patients without a clinical response/remission at week 4. <b>Results:</b> Propensity score-matching analysis revealed that the clinical response rate gradually increased to 72.2% at 8 weeks in the TOF group, whereas it tended to decrease to 48.5% in the FIL group. Clinical remission rates increased from 2 (36.7% vs. 36.7%) to 8 weeks (63.6% vs. 48.5%) after treatment in the TOF and FIL groups, respectively. The clinical response rate was higher in the TOF group than in the FIL group at week 8 in patients without a clinical response at week 4 (38.5% vs. 0%; <i>p</i> = 0.011). The clinical remission rate was also higher in the TOF group than in the FIL group at week 8 in patients without clinical remission at week 4 (50.0% vs. 16.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.046). The incident rates of infection and anemia were higher in the TOF group than in the FIL group. <b>Conclusions:</b> TOF may be more effective than FIL at 8 weeks for patients with UC who do not respond to treatment within the first 4 weeks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11721360/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14010217\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14010217","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:很少有研究比较Janus激酶(JAK)抑制剂在溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者中的疗效和安全性。我们通过倾向评分匹配分析比较了tofacitinib (TOF)和filgotinib (FIL)作为UC诱导治疗的实际有效性和安全性。方法:我们招募了230例活动性UC患者,他们接受TOF (n = 197)或FIL (n = 33)作为诱导治疗。主要结局是第8周的临床反应,次要结局是第2-8周的临床反应/缓解率,包括第4周无临床反应/缓解的患者病程。结果:倾向评分匹配分析显示,TOF组临床缓解率在8周时逐渐上升至72.2%,而FIL组有下降趋势,至48.5%。TOF组和FIL组的临床缓解率分别从治疗后2周(36.7%对36.7%)增加到8周(63.6%对48.5%)。在第4周无临床反应的患者中,TOF组在第8周的临床缓解率高于FIL组(38.5% vs 0%;P = 0.011)。在第4周无临床缓解的患者中,TOF组在第8周的临床缓解率也高于FIL组(50.0% vs. 16.7%;P = 0.046)。TOF组感染和贫血发生率高于FIL组。结论:对于前4周治疗无效的UC患者,TOF可能比FIL在8周时更有效。
Continuous Treatment with Tofacitinib but Not Filgotinib Is Effective in Non-Responders with Active Ulcerative Colitis: A Propensity Score-Matching Analysis.
Background: Few studies have compared the efficacy and safety of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). We compared the real-world effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib (TOF) and filgotinib (FIL) as induction therapy for UC by propensity score-matching analysis. Methods: We enrolled 230 patients with active UC who received either TOF (n = 197) or FIL (n = 33) as induction therapy. The primary outcome was the clinical response at week 8, and the secondary outcomes were the clinical response/remission rates from weeks 2-8, including the course of patients without a clinical response/remission at week 4. Results: Propensity score-matching analysis revealed that the clinical response rate gradually increased to 72.2% at 8 weeks in the TOF group, whereas it tended to decrease to 48.5% in the FIL group. Clinical remission rates increased from 2 (36.7% vs. 36.7%) to 8 weeks (63.6% vs. 48.5%) after treatment in the TOF and FIL groups, respectively. The clinical response rate was higher in the TOF group than in the FIL group at week 8 in patients without a clinical response at week 4 (38.5% vs. 0%; p = 0.011). The clinical remission rate was also higher in the TOF group than in the FIL group at week 8 in patients without clinical remission at week 4 (50.0% vs. 16.7%; p = 0.046). The incident rates of infection and anemia were higher in the TOF group than in the FIL group. Conclusions: TOF may be more effective than FIL at 8 weeks for patients with UC who do not respond to treatment within the first 4 weeks.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals.
Unique features of this journal:
manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes.
There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.