胸外科预后研究网络（ThORN）关于确定早期肺癌高质量楔形切除术的共识文件。

IF 3.6 2区医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Annals of Thoracic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.12.017

Seth B Krantz, Brian Mitzman, Mara B Antonoff, Leah Backhus, Stephen R Broderick, Lisa M Brown, Jennifer M Burg, Elizabeth Colwell, Alberto de Hoyos, Kathryn Engelhardt, Rian M Hasson, Hari B Keshava, Onkar V Khullar, Biniam Kidane, Shari L Meyerson, Gita N Mody, Clinton Morgan, Joseph D Phillips, David D Odell, Uma M Sachdeva, Elliot L Servais, Christina M Stuart, Kei Suzuki, Brooks V Udelsman, Thomas K Varghese, Elliot Wakeam, Chi-Fu J Yang, Robert A Meguid, David T Cooke

{"title":"胸外科预后研究网络（ThORN）关于确定早期肺癌高质量楔形切除术的共识文件。","authors":"Seth B Krantz, Brian Mitzman, Mara B Antonoff, Leah Backhus, Stephen R Broderick, Lisa M Brown, Jennifer M Burg, Elizabeth Colwell, Alberto de Hoyos, Kathryn Engelhardt, Rian M Hasson, Hari B Keshava, Onkar V Khullar, Biniam Kidane, Shari L Meyerson, Gita N Mody, Clinton Morgan, Joseph D Phillips, David D Odell, Uma M Sachdeva, Elliot L Servais, Christina M Stuart, Kei Suzuki, Brooks V Udelsman, Thomas K Varghese, Elliot Wakeam, Chi-Fu J Yang, Robert A Meguid, David T Cooke","doi":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.12.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the publication of CALGB 140503, an increase in wedge resections for small, peripheral non-small cell lung cancer is expected; however, a relative paucity of data exists as to what defines a high quality oncologic wedge resection. The Thoracic Surgery Outcomes Research Network (ThORN), through expert discussion, guided by review of what limited data does exist, and through use of a modified Delphi process, provides these consensus statements defining an oncologically sound, high quality wedge resection. The statements are classified into five categories: 1) Preoperative Considerations 2) Technical Aspects 3) Lymph Node Assessment 4) Margin Assessment and 5) Tissue Handling by Pathology.","PeriodicalId":50976,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thoracic Surgery Outcomes Research Network (ThORN) Consensus Document on Defining a High Quality Wedge Resection for Early Stage Lung Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Seth B Krantz, Brian Mitzman, Mara B Antonoff, Leah Backhus, Stephen R Broderick, Lisa M Brown, Jennifer M Burg, Elizabeth Colwell, Alberto de Hoyos, Kathryn Engelhardt, Rian M Hasson, Hari B Keshava, Onkar V Khullar, Biniam Kidane, Shari L Meyerson, Gita N Mody, Clinton Morgan, Joseph D Phillips, David D Odell, Uma M Sachdeva, Elliot L Servais, Christina M Stuart, Kei Suzuki, Brooks V Udelsman, Thomas K Varghese, Elliot Wakeam, Chi-Fu J Yang, Robert A Meguid, David T Cooke\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.12.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the publication of CALGB 140503, an increase in wedge resections for small, peripheral non-small cell lung cancer is expected; however, a relative paucity of data exists as to what defines a high quality oncologic wedge resection. The Thoracic Surgery Outcomes Research Network (ThORN), through expert discussion, guided by review of what limited data does exist, and through use of a modified Delphi process, provides these consensus statements defining an oncologically sound, high quality wedge resection. The statements are classified into five categories: 1) Preoperative Considerations 2) Technical Aspects 3) Lymph Node Assessment 4) Margin Assessment and 5) Tissue Handling by Pathology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Thoracic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Thoracic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.12.017\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.12.017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

随着CALGB 140503的发布，预计小外周非小细胞肺癌的楔形切除术将会增加；然而，关于如何定义高质量肿瘤楔形切除术的数据相对缺乏。胸外科结果研究网络（ThORN），通过专家讨论，在审查有限数据的指导下，并通过使用改进的德尔菲过程，提供了这些共识声明，定义了肿瘤上合理的，高质量的楔形切除术。这些陈述分为五类：1)术前考虑；2)技术方面；3)淋巴结评估；4)边缘评估；5)病理组织处理。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Thoracic Surgery Outcomes Research Network (ThORN) Consensus Document on Defining a High Quality Wedge Resection for Early Stage Lung Cancer.

With the publication of CALGB 140503, an increase in wedge resections for small, peripheral non-small cell lung cancer is expected; however, a relative paucity of data exists as to what defines a high quality oncologic wedge resection. The Thoracic Surgery Outcomes Research Network (ThORN), through expert discussion, guided by review of what limited data does exist, and through use of a modified Delphi process, provides these consensus statements defining an oncologically sound, high quality wedge resection. The statements are classified into five categories: 1) Preoperative Considerations 2) Technical Aspects 3) Lymph Node Assessment 4) Margin Assessment and 5) Tissue Handling by Pathology.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Annals of Thoracic Surgery 医学-呼吸系统

CiteScore

6.40

自引率

13.00%

发文量

1235

审稿时长

42 days

期刊介绍： The mission of The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is to promote scholarship in cardiothoracic surgery patient care, clinical practice, research, education, and policy. As the official journal of two of the largest American associations in its specialty, this leading monthly enjoys outstanding editorial leadership and maintains rigorous selection standards. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery features: • Full-length original articles on clinical advances, current surgical methods, and controversial topics and techniques • New Technology articles • Case reports • "How-to-do-it" features • Reviews of current literature • Supplements on symposia • Commentary pieces and correspondence • CME • Online-only case reports, "how-to-do-its", and images in cardiothoracic surgery. An authoritative, clinically oriented, comprehensive resource, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is committed to providing a place for all thoracic surgeons to relate experiences which will help improve patient care.