共同设计的健康教育模式,以改善有情绪和行为困难的儿童的结果:可接受性、可行性和影响的研究。

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Archives of Disease in Childhood Pub Date : 2025-01-11 DOI:10.1136/archdischild-2024-327119
William Garvey, Lingling Chen, Frank Oberklaid, Harriet Hiscock
{"title":"共同设计的健康教育模式,以改善有情绪和行为困难的儿童的结果:可接受性、可行性和影响的研究。","authors":"William Garvey, Lingling Chen, Frank Oberklaid, Harriet Hiscock","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2024-327119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the acceptability and impacts of a co-designed health education model aiming to improve outcomes for children with emotional and behavioural difficulties.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative focus group study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Six primary schools from metropolitan and rural settings in the state of Victoria, Australia.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>36 educators who engaged with the intervention between July and December 2021.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Co-designed community of practice, led by a paediatrician, with fortnightly tailored case-based discussions aiming to build educator capacity to identify and support children with emotional and behavioural difficulties.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>At the completion of the intervention, all educators were invited to participate in focus groups with their school group. The lead author facilitated the groups. Semistructured questions guided the sessions focusing on the motivation of participants, their experience of the intervention, its impact on their work and suggestions for possible improvements and impact upon their own well-being. Sessions were audio recorded, and field notes were taken by the facilitator. Interpretative phenomenological analysis was carried out to evaluate the data collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>36 of 46 educators completed six focus groups (one per school). Participants were highly motivated due to the mental health needs of their students. Participants experienced the intervention as stimulating and providing practical strategies. Participants discussed the positive impact it had on their capacity to support children with emotional and behavioural difficulties as well as their own well-being.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The intervention is highly acceptable to educators, and evaluating this intervention with a larger sample will inform expansion.</p>","PeriodicalId":8150,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A co-designed health education model to improve outcomes for children with emotional and behavioural difficulties: a study of acceptability, feasibility and impacts.\",\"authors\":\"William Garvey, Lingling Chen, Frank Oberklaid, Harriet Hiscock\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/archdischild-2024-327119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the acceptability and impacts of a co-designed health education model aiming to improve outcomes for children with emotional and behavioural difficulties.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative focus group study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Six primary schools from metropolitan and rural settings in the state of Victoria, Australia.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>36 educators who engaged with the intervention between July and December 2021.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Co-designed community of practice, led by a paediatrician, with fortnightly tailored case-based discussions aiming to build educator capacity to identify and support children with emotional and behavioural difficulties.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>At the completion of the intervention, all educators were invited to participate in focus groups with their school group. The lead author facilitated the groups. Semistructured questions guided the sessions focusing on the motivation of participants, their experience of the intervention, its impact on their work and suggestions for possible improvements and impact upon their own well-being. Sessions were audio recorded, and field notes were taken by the facilitator. Interpretative phenomenological analysis was carried out to evaluate the data collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>36 of 46 educators completed six focus groups (one per school). Participants were highly motivated due to the mental health needs of their students. Participants experienced the intervention as stimulating and providing practical strategies. Participants discussed the positive impact it had on their capacity to support children with emotional and behavioural difficulties as well as their own well-being.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The intervention is highly acceptable to educators, and evaluating this intervention with a larger sample will inform expansion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Disease in Childhood\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Disease in Childhood\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2024-327119\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Disease in Childhood","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2024-327119","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估共同设计的健康教育模式的可接受性和影响,旨在改善情绪和行为困难儿童的预后。设计:定性焦点小组研究。背景:澳大利亚维多利亚州的六所小学,分别来自城市和农村。参与者:在2021年7月至12月期间参与干预的36名教育工作者。干预措施:由一名儿科医生领导的合作设计的实践社区,每两周进行一次量身定制的基于案例的讨论,旨在建立教育者识别和支持有情感和行为困难的儿童的能力。主要结果测量:在干预结束时,所有教育工作者被邀请与他们的学校小组一起参加焦点小组。第一作者为这些小组提供了便利。半结构化的问题指导了会议,重点关注参与者的动机、他们对干预的体验、干预对他们工作的影响以及对可能的改进和对他们自己福祉的影响的建议。会议录音,并由调解人作现场记录。对收集到的数据进行解释性现象学分析。结果:46名教育工作者中有36名完成了6个焦点小组(每个学校一个)。由于学生的心理健康需求,参与者的积极性很高。参与者将干预体验为刺激和提供实用策略。与会者讨论了它对他们支持有情绪和行为困难的儿童的能力以及他们自己的福祉产生的积极影响。结论:教育工作者对干预措施的接受度很高,在更大的样本中评估这种干预措施将为扩展提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A co-designed health education model to improve outcomes for children with emotional and behavioural difficulties: a study of acceptability, feasibility and impacts.

Objective: To assess the acceptability and impacts of a co-designed health education model aiming to improve outcomes for children with emotional and behavioural difficulties.

Design: Qualitative focus group study.

Setting: Six primary schools from metropolitan and rural settings in the state of Victoria, Australia.

Participants: 36 educators who engaged with the intervention between July and December 2021.

Intervention: Co-designed community of practice, led by a paediatrician, with fortnightly tailored case-based discussions aiming to build educator capacity to identify and support children with emotional and behavioural difficulties.

Main outcome measures: At the completion of the intervention, all educators were invited to participate in focus groups with their school group. The lead author facilitated the groups. Semistructured questions guided the sessions focusing on the motivation of participants, their experience of the intervention, its impact on their work and suggestions for possible improvements and impact upon their own well-being. Sessions were audio recorded, and field notes were taken by the facilitator. Interpretative phenomenological analysis was carried out to evaluate the data collected.

Results: 36 of 46 educators completed six focus groups (one per school). Participants were highly motivated due to the mental health needs of their students. Participants experienced the intervention as stimulating and providing practical strategies. Participants discussed the positive impact it had on their capacity to support children with emotional and behavioural difficulties as well as their own well-being.

Conclusions: The intervention is highly acceptable to educators, and evaluating this intervention with a larger sample will inform expansion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
291
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Disease in Childhood is an international peer review journal that aims to keep paediatricians and others up to date with advances in the diagnosis and treatment of childhood diseases as well as advocacy issues such as child protection. It focuses on all aspects of child health and disease from the perinatal period (in the Fetal and Neonatal edition) through to adolescence. ADC includes original research reports, commentaries, reviews of clinical and policy issues, and evidence reports. Areas covered include: community child health, public health, epidemiology, acute paediatrics, advocacy, and ethics.
期刊最新文献
How can parents' experience of child death reviews be improved? Gender affirming hormone therapy for individuals with gender dysphoria aged <26 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood folate level needed for fully effective fortification in the prevention of neural tube defects. Severe accidental poisonings in children: a British Paediatric Surveillance Unit nationwide prospective study. Topical analgesia during needle-related procedures in children: a clinical practice guideline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1