Fadi Alfaqawi, Luca Pagano, Esmaeil M Arbabi, Vito Romano, Ahmed Al-Maskari, Keri McLean, Gabriella Czanner, Stephen B Kaye
{"title":"白内障手术对角膜形状的影响很小。","authors":"Fadi Alfaqawi, Luca Pagano, Esmaeil M Arbabi, Vito Romano, Ahmed Al-Maskari, Keri McLean, Gabriella Czanner, Stephen B Kaye","doi":"10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To quantify the effect of cataract surgery on cornea shape.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing cataract surgery with standardised 2.75 mm surgical incisions at 110 degrees with a side port at 50 degrees were included. Repeat biometric measurements were taken before surgery and at 6 weeks on both operated and unoperated fellow eyes. Data were transformed into Long's formalism for analysis. Device-specific measurement error was determined. The main outcome measure was the change in keratometry taking into account the change in keratometry of the unoperated fellow eye. Secondary outcome measures included the variability introduced due to location of the incision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>132 patients were included. The mean change in keratometry of the operated eye was -0.23@111/+0.21@21 (95% CI -1.43@122/+0.04@32 to +1.04@135/+0.30@45). The flattening effect of the surgical incision was greater and more variable than the steepening effect (p<0.01), particularly if the incision was in the flat meridian. Coupling, defined as ratio of the keratometric change in the preoperative meridians of K2 and K1, varied from 0.91 (SD 2.31) for eyes with an incision in the steep meridian, 0.75 (SD 1.81) for an incision in the flat meridian to 0.28 (SD 2.06) when the incision was made in a neutral meridian.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cataract surgery has a slightly greater flattening than steepening effect on corneal shape. Although the effects are very small and variable with incomplete coupling, it is preferable to place the incision in the steep meridian. Greater emphasis, however, should be placed on eye-specific factors, such as biometry, or patient-related factors to optimise refractive outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9286,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cataract surgery has minimal effect on corneal shape.\",\"authors\":\"Fadi Alfaqawi, Luca Pagano, Esmaeil M Arbabi, Vito Romano, Ahmed Al-Maskari, Keri McLean, Gabriella Czanner, Stephen B Kaye\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001920\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To quantify the effect of cataract surgery on cornea shape.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing cataract surgery with standardised 2.75 mm surgical incisions at 110 degrees with a side port at 50 degrees were included. Repeat biometric measurements were taken before surgery and at 6 weeks on both operated and unoperated fellow eyes. Data were transformed into Long's formalism for analysis. Device-specific measurement error was determined. The main outcome measure was the change in keratometry taking into account the change in keratometry of the unoperated fellow eye. Secondary outcome measures included the variability introduced due to location of the incision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>132 patients were included. The mean change in keratometry of the operated eye was -0.23@111/+0.21@21 (95% CI -1.43@122/+0.04@32 to +1.04@135/+0.30@45). The flattening effect of the surgical incision was greater and more variable than the steepening effect (p<0.01), particularly if the incision was in the flat meridian. Coupling, defined as ratio of the keratometric change in the preoperative meridians of K2 and K1, varied from 0.91 (SD 2.31) for eyes with an incision in the steep meridian, 0.75 (SD 1.81) for an incision in the flat meridian to 0.28 (SD 2.06) when the incision was made in a neutral meridian.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cataract surgery has a slightly greater flattening than steepening effect on corneal shape. Although the effects are very small and variable with incomplete coupling, it is preferable to place the incision in the steep meridian. Greater emphasis, however, should be placed on eye-specific factors, such as biometry, or patient-related factors to optimise refractive outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001920\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:量化白内障手术对角膜形态的影响。方法:采用2.75 mm标准切口110度侧孔50度白内障手术患者。在手术前和6周时对手术和未手术的双眼进行重复生物测量。数据被转换成朗的形式进行分析。确定了特定于设备的测量误差。主要的结果测量是考虑到未手术眼的角膜测量变化的角膜测量变化。次要结果测量包括由于切口位置引起的可变性。结果:纳入132例患者。手术眼角膜测量的平均变化为-0.23@111/+0.21@21 (95% CI -1.43@122/+0.04@32至+1.04@135/+0.30@45)。结论:白内障手术对角膜形态的平坦化作用略大于陡峭化作用。虽然影响很小且不完全耦合,但最好将切口放置在陡峭的经络上。然而,应该更加重视眼睛的特定因素,如生物测量或患者相关因素,以优化屈光结果。
Cataract surgery has minimal effect on corneal shape.
Purpose: To quantify the effect of cataract surgery on cornea shape.
Methods: Patients undergoing cataract surgery with standardised 2.75 mm surgical incisions at 110 degrees with a side port at 50 degrees were included. Repeat biometric measurements were taken before surgery and at 6 weeks on both operated and unoperated fellow eyes. Data were transformed into Long's formalism for analysis. Device-specific measurement error was determined. The main outcome measure was the change in keratometry taking into account the change in keratometry of the unoperated fellow eye. Secondary outcome measures included the variability introduced due to location of the incision.
Results: 132 patients were included. The mean change in keratometry of the operated eye was -0.23@111/+0.21@21 (95% CI -1.43@122/+0.04@32 to +1.04@135/+0.30@45). The flattening effect of the surgical incision was greater and more variable than the steepening effect (p<0.01), particularly if the incision was in the flat meridian. Coupling, defined as ratio of the keratometric change in the preoperative meridians of K2 and K1, varied from 0.91 (SD 2.31) for eyes with an incision in the steep meridian, 0.75 (SD 1.81) for an incision in the flat meridian to 0.28 (SD 2.06) when the incision was made in a neutral meridian.
Conclusion: Cataract surgery has a slightly greater flattening than steepening effect on corneal shape. Although the effects are very small and variable with incomplete coupling, it is preferable to place the incision in the steep meridian. Greater emphasis, however, should be placed on eye-specific factors, such as biometry, or patient-related factors to optimise refractive outcomes.