根治性膀胱切除术患者术后增强恢复:实施十年后外科医生的观点和建议。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Ejso Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2024.109543
Simone Albisinni, Luca Orecchia, Georges Mjaess, Fouad Aoun, Francesco Del Giudice, Luca Antonelli, Marco Moschini, Francesco Soria, Laura S Mertens, Andrea Gallioli, Gauthier Marcq, Benjamin Pradere, Bernard Bochner, Alberto Breda, Alberto Briganti, James Catto, Karel Decaestecker, Paolo Gontero, Ashish Kamat, Edward Lambert, Andrea Minervini, Alexandre Mottrie, Morgan Roupret, Shahrokh Shariat, Carl Wijburg, Malte Rieken, Peter Wiklund, Andrea Mari
{"title":"根治性膀胱切除术患者术后增强恢复:实施十年后外科医生的观点和建议。","authors":"Simone Albisinni, Luca Orecchia, Georges Mjaess, Fouad Aoun, Francesco Del Giudice, Luca Antonelli, Marco Moschini, Francesco Soria, Laura S Mertens, Andrea Gallioli, Gauthier Marcq, Benjamin Pradere, Bernard Bochner, Alberto Breda, Alberto Briganti, James Catto, Karel Decaestecker, Paolo Gontero, Ashish Kamat, Edward Lambert, Andrea Minervini, Alexandre Mottrie, Morgan Roupret, Shahrokh Shariat, Carl Wijburg, Malte Rieken, Peter Wiklund, Andrea Mari","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2024.109543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines for Radical Cystectomy (RC) were published over ten years ago. Aim of this systematic review is to update ERAS recommendations for patients undergoing RC and to give an expert opinion on the relevance of each single ERAS item.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was performed to identify the impact of each single ERAS item on RC outcomes. Embase and Medline (through Pubmed) were searched systematically. Relevant articles were selected and graded. For each ERAS item, a level of evidence was determined. An e-Delphi consensus was then performed amongst an international panel with renowned experience in RC to provide recommendations based on expert opinion.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Preoperative medical optimization and avoiding bowel preparation are highly recommended. Robotic-assisted RC with intracorporeal urinary diversion is moderately recommended and can help in applying other ERAS items, such as early mobilization. Medical thromboprophylaxis should be administered and nasogastric tube should be removed at the end of surgery. Perioperative fluid restriction as well as opioid-sparing anesthesia protocols should be implemented. Generally, consensus was reached on most ERAS items, with the exception of epidural anesthesia (no consensus), resection site drainage (consensus against), and type of urinary drainage. Limitations include the lack of a multidisciplinary approach to the present consensus, giving however a highly specialized surgical opinion on ERAS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>and clinical implications: The current study updates ERAS recommendations for patients undergoing RC and suggests application of ERAS by a panel of experts in the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":"51 3","pages":"109543"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for patients undergoing radical cystectomy: Surgeons' perspectives and recommendations ten years after its implementation.\",\"authors\":\"Simone Albisinni, Luca Orecchia, Georges Mjaess, Fouad Aoun, Francesco Del Giudice, Luca Antonelli, Marco Moschini, Francesco Soria, Laura S Mertens, Andrea Gallioli, Gauthier Marcq, Benjamin Pradere, Bernard Bochner, Alberto Breda, Alberto Briganti, James Catto, Karel Decaestecker, Paolo Gontero, Ashish Kamat, Edward Lambert, Andrea Minervini, Alexandre Mottrie, Morgan Roupret, Shahrokh Shariat, Carl Wijburg, Malte Rieken, Peter Wiklund, Andrea Mari\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejso.2024.109543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines for Radical Cystectomy (RC) were published over ten years ago. Aim of this systematic review is to update ERAS recommendations for patients undergoing RC and to give an expert opinion on the relevance of each single ERAS item.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was performed to identify the impact of each single ERAS item on RC outcomes. Embase and Medline (through Pubmed) were searched systematically. Relevant articles were selected and graded. For each ERAS item, a level of evidence was determined. An e-Delphi consensus was then performed amongst an international panel with renowned experience in RC to provide recommendations based on expert opinion.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Preoperative medical optimization and avoiding bowel preparation are highly recommended. Robotic-assisted RC with intracorporeal urinary diversion is moderately recommended and can help in applying other ERAS items, such as early mobilization. Medical thromboprophylaxis should be administered and nasogastric tube should be removed at the end of surgery. Perioperative fluid restriction as well as opioid-sparing anesthesia protocols should be implemented. Generally, consensus was reached on most ERAS items, with the exception of epidural anesthesia (no consensus), resection site drainage (consensus against), and type of urinary drainage. Limitations include the lack of a multidisciplinary approach to the present consensus, giving however a highly specialized surgical opinion on ERAS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>and clinical implications: The current study updates ERAS recommendations for patients undergoing RC and suggests application of ERAS by a panel of experts in the field.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ejso\",\"volume\":\"51 3\",\"pages\":\"109543\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ejso\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2024.109543\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ejso","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2024.109543","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:根治性膀胱切除术(RC)的术后恢复指南(ERAS)发布于十多年前。本系统综述旨在更新针对接受根治性膀胱切除术患者的 ERAS 建议,并就 ERAS 各项目的相关性提供专家意见:方法:我们进行了一项系统性回顾,以确定 ERAS 各个项目对 RC 结果的影响。系统检索了Embase和Medline(通过Pubmed)。对相关文章进行筛选和分级。对每个 ERAS 项目都确定了证据等级。然后,由一个在 RC 方面具有丰富经验的国际专家小组达成 e-Delphi 共识,根据专家意见提出建议:强烈建议进行术前医疗优化并避免肠道准备。适度推荐使用机器人辅助 RC 并进行体外尿路转流,这有助于应用 ERAS 的其他项目,如早期活动。应进行血栓预防治疗,并在手术结束时拔除鼻胃管。应实施围手术期液体限制和阿片类药物稀释麻醉方案。总体而言,除了硬膜外麻醉(未达成共识)、切除部位引流(反对共识)和尿液引流类型外,ERAS的大多数项目都达成了共识。局限性包括本共识缺乏多学科方法,但对ERAS提出了高度专业化的外科意见:目前的研究更新了针对接受 RC 患者的 ERAS 建议,并建议该领域的专家小组应用 ERAS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for patients undergoing radical cystectomy: Surgeons' perspectives and recommendations ten years after its implementation.

Background and objectives: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines for Radical Cystectomy (RC) were published over ten years ago. Aim of this systematic review is to update ERAS recommendations for patients undergoing RC and to give an expert opinion on the relevance of each single ERAS item.

Methods: A systematic review was performed to identify the impact of each single ERAS item on RC outcomes. Embase and Medline (through Pubmed) were searched systematically. Relevant articles were selected and graded. For each ERAS item, a level of evidence was determined. An e-Delphi consensus was then performed amongst an international panel with renowned experience in RC to provide recommendations based on expert opinion.

Key findings and limitations: Preoperative medical optimization and avoiding bowel preparation are highly recommended. Robotic-assisted RC with intracorporeal urinary diversion is moderately recommended and can help in applying other ERAS items, such as early mobilization. Medical thromboprophylaxis should be administered and nasogastric tube should be removed at the end of surgery. Perioperative fluid restriction as well as opioid-sparing anesthesia protocols should be implemented. Generally, consensus was reached on most ERAS items, with the exception of epidural anesthesia (no consensus), resection site drainage (consensus against), and type of urinary drainage. Limitations include the lack of a multidisciplinary approach to the present consensus, giving however a highly specialized surgical opinion on ERAS.

Conclusions: and clinical implications: The current study updates ERAS recommendations for patients undergoing RC and suggests application of ERAS by a panel of experts in the field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ejso
Ejso 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1148
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: JSO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology ("the Journal of Cancer Surgery") is the Official Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and BASO ~ the Association for Cancer Surgery. The EJSO aims to advance surgical oncology research and practice through the publication of original research articles, review articles, editorials, debates and correspondence.
期刊最新文献
Clinical implications of disappearing pancreatic cancer liver metastases: Lessons from colorectal liver metastases. Severe postoperative pancreatitis following treatment of peritoneal metastases. Risk factors and prognostic factors of pleural metastases in thymic epithelial tumors: A narrative review. Long-term outcomes of hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: A comparative study with conventional hepatectomy. Overcoming the technical challenge of venous resection with pancreatectomy: Which factors determine survival?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1