Eline H Huele, Roxanne Gal, Wietse S C Eppinga, Helena M Verkooijen, John E O'Toole, Ilya Laufer, Daniel M Sciubba, Cordula Netzer, Wouter Foppen, Arjun Sahgal, Michael G Fehlings, Sheng-Fu L Lo, Charles G Fisher, Laurence D Rhines, Jeremy J Reynolds, Aron Lazary, Alessandro Gasbarrini, Nicolas Dea, Michael H Weber, Jorrit Jan Verlaan
{"title":"转移性脊柱疾病中神经功能缺损发生的危险因素:一项国际、多中心德尔菲研究","authors":"Eline H Huele, Roxanne Gal, Wietse S C Eppinga, Helena M Verkooijen, John E O'Toole, Ilya Laufer, Daniel M Sciubba, Cordula Netzer, Wouter Foppen, Arjun Sahgal, Michael G Fehlings, Sheng-Fu L Lo, Charles G Fisher, Laurence D Rhines, Jeremy J Reynolds, Aron Lazary, Alessandro Gasbarrini, Nicolas Dea, Michael H Weber, Jorrit Jan Verlaan","doi":"10.1177/21925682231222424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Delphi study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to identify risk factors associated with the development and/or progression of neurological deficits in patients with metastatic spinal disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A three-round Delphi study was conducted between January-May 2023 including AO Spine members, comprising mainly neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons. In round 1, participants listed radiological factors, patient characteristics, tumor characteristics, previous cancer-related treatment factors and additional factors. In round 2, participants ranked the factors on importance per category and selected a top 9 from all factors. Kendall's W coefficient of concordance was calculated as a measure of consensus. In the final round, participants provided feedback on the rankings resulting from round 2. Lastly, the highest-ranking factors were more clearly defined and operationalized by an expert panel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over two hundred physicians and researchers participated in each round. The factors listed in the first round were collapsed into 12 radiological factors, 14 patient characteristics, 6 tumor characteristics and 12 previous cancer-related treatment factors. High agreement was found in round 3 on the top-half lists in each category and the overall top 9, originating from round 2. Kendall's W indicated strong agreement between the participants. 'Epidural spinal cord compression', 'aggressive tumor behavior' and 'mechanical instability' were deemed most influential for the development of neurological deficits.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides factors that may be related to the development and/or progression of neurological deficits in patients with metastatic spinal disease. This list can serve as a basis for future directions in prognostication research.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":"15 1_suppl","pages":"93S-103S"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11726512/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Factors for the Development of Neurological Deficits in Metastatic Spinal Disease: An International, Multicenter Delphi Study.\",\"authors\":\"Eline H Huele, Roxanne Gal, Wietse S C Eppinga, Helena M Verkooijen, John E O'Toole, Ilya Laufer, Daniel M Sciubba, Cordula Netzer, Wouter Foppen, Arjun Sahgal, Michael G Fehlings, Sheng-Fu L Lo, Charles G Fisher, Laurence D Rhines, Jeremy J Reynolds, Aron Lazary, Alessandro Gasbarrini, Nicolas Dea, Michael H Weber, Jorrit Jan Verlaan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21925682231222424\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Delphi study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to identify risk factors associated with the development and/or progression of neurological deficits in patients with metastatic spinal disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A three-round Delphi study was conducted between January-May 2023 including AO Spine members, comprising mainly neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons. In round 1, participants listed radiological factors, patient characteristics, tumor characteristics, previous cancer-related treatment factors and additional factors. In round 2, participants ranked the factors on importance per category and selected a top 9 from all factors. Kendall's W coefficient of concordance was calculated as a measure of consensus. In the final round, participants provided feedback on the rankings resulting from round 2. Lastly, the highest-ranking factors were more clearly defined and operationalized by an expert panel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over two hundred physicians and researchers participated in each round. The factors listed in the first round were collapsed into 12 radiological factors, 14 patient characteristics, 6 tumor characteristics and 12 previous cancer-related treatment factors. High agreement was found in round 3 on the top-half lists in each category and the overall top 9, originating from round 2. Kendall's W indicated strong agreement between the participants. 'Epidural spinal cord compression', 'aggressive tumor behavior' and 'mechanical instability' were deemed most influential for the development of neurological deficits.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides factors that may be related to the development and/or progression of neurological deficits in patients with metastatic spinal disease. This list can serve as a basis for future directions in prognostication research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\"15 1_suppl\",\"pages\":\"93S-103S\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11726512/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682231222424\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682231222424","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究设计:德尔菲研究:本研究旨在确定与转移性脊柱疾病患者神经功能缺损的发生和/或进展相关的风险因素:在 2023 年 1 月至 5 月期间进行了三轮德尔菲研究,参与者包括 AO Spine 会员,主要是神经外科医生和骨科医生。在第一轮中,参与者列出了放射学因素、患者特征、肿瘤特征、既往癌症相关治疗因素和其他因素。在第二轮中,参与者对每类因素的重要性进行排序,并从所有因素中选出前 9 个。Kendall's W 一致性系数被计算出来,作为衡量共识的标准。在最后一轮,参与者对第二轮得出的排名提供反馈意见。最后,专家小组对排名最高的因素进行了更明确的定义和操作:结果:两百多名医生和研究人员参加了每一轮评选。第一轮列出的因素被归纳为 12 个放射学因素、14 个患者特征、6 个肿瘤特征和 12 个既往癌症相关治疗因素。在第三轮中,每个类别中排名前半部分的名单和排名前 9 位的总名单(源于第二轮)的一致性很高。Kendall's W 表明参与者之间的一致性很高。硬膜外脊髓压迫"、"侵袭性肿瘤行为 "和 "机械不稳定性 "被认为对神经功能缺损的发生影响最大:本研究提供了可能与转移性脊柱疾病患者神经功能缺损的发生和/或进展有关的因素。这份清单可作为未来预后研究方向的基础。
Risk Factors for the Development of Neurological Deficits in Metastatic Spinal Disease: An International, Multicenter Delphi Study.
Study design: Delphi study.
Objective: The objective of this study was to identify risk factors associated with the development and/or progression of neurological deficits in patients with metastatic spinal disease.
Methods: A three-round Delphi study was conducted between January-May 2023 including AO Spine members, comprising mainly neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons. In round 1, participants listed radiological factors, patient characteristics, tumor characteristics, previous cancer-related treatment factors and additional factors. In round 2, participants ranked the factors on importance per category and selected a top 9 from all factors. Kendall's W coefficient of concordance was calculated as a measure of consensus. In the final round, participants provided feedback on the rankings resulting from round 2. Lastly, the highest-ranking factors were more clearly defined and operationalized by an expert panel.
Results: Over two hundred physicians and researchers participated in each round. The factors listed in the first round were collapsed into 12 radiological factors, 14 patient characteristics, 6 tumor characteristics and 12 previous cancer-related treatment factors. High agreement was found in round 3 on the top-half lists in each category and the overall top 9, originating from round 2. Kendall's W indicated strong agreement between the participants. 'Epidural spinal cord compression', 'aggressive tumor behavior' and 'mechanical instability' were deemed most influential for the development of neurological deficits.
Conclusion: This study provides factors that may be related to the development and/or progression of neurological deficits in patients with metastatic spinal disease. This list can serve as a basis for future directions in prognostication research.
期刊介绍:
Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).