转移性脊柱疾病中神经功能缺损发生的危险因素:一项国际、多中心德尔菲研究

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Global Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/21925682231222424
Eline H Huele, Roxanne Gal, Wietse S C Eppinga, Helena M Verkooijen, John E O'Toole, Ilya Laufer, Daniel M Sciubba, Cordula Netzer, Wouter Foppen, Arjun Sahgal, Michael G Fehlings, Sheng-Fu L Lo, Charles G Fisher, Laurence D Rhines, Jeremy J Reynolds, Aron Lazary, Alessandro Gasbarrini, Nicolas Dea, Michael H Weber, Jorrit Jan Verlaan
{"title":"转移性脊柱疾病中神经功能缺损发生的危险因素:一项国际、多中心德尔菲研究","authors":"Eline H Huele, Roxanne Gal, Wietse S C Eppinga, Helena M Verkooijen, John E O'Toole, Ilya Laufer, Daniel M Sciubba, Cordula Netzer, Wouter Foppen, Arjun Sahgal, Michael G Fehlings, Sheng-Fu L Lo, Charles G Fisher, Laurence D Rhines, Jeremy J Reynolds, Aron Lazary, Alessandro Gasbarrini, Nicolas Dea, Michael H Weber, Jorrit Jan Verlaan","doi":"10.1177/21925682231222424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Delphi study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to identify risk factors associated with the development and/or progression of neurological deficits in patients with metastatic spinal disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A three-round Delphi study was conducted between January-May 2023 including AO Spine members, comprising mainly neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons. In round 1, participants listed radiological factors, patient characteristics, tumor characteristics, previous cancer-related treatment factors and additional factors. In round 2, participants ranked the factors on importance per category and selected a top 9 from all factors. Kendall's W coefficient of concordance was calculated as a measure of consensus. In the final round, participants provided feedback on the rankings resulting from round 2. Lastly, the highest-ranking factors were more clearly defined and operationalized by an expert panel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over two hundred physicians and researchers participated in each round. The factors listed in the first round were collapsed into 12 radiological factors, 14 patient characteristics, 6 tumor characteristics and 12 previous cancer-related treatment factors. High agreement was found in round 3 on the top-half lists in each category and the overall top 9, originating from round 2. Kendall's W indicated strong agreement between the participants. 'Epidural spinal cord compression', 'aggressive tumor behavior' and 'mechanical instability' were deemed most influential for the development of neurological deficits.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides factors that may be related to the development and/or progression of neurological deficits in patients with metastatic spinal disease. This list can serve as a basis for future directions in prognostication research.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":"15 1_suppl","pages":"93S-103S"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11726512/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Factors for the Development of Neurological Deficits in Metastatic Spinal Disease: An International, Multicenter Delphi Study.\",\"authors\":\"Eline H Huele, Roxanne Gal, Wietse S C Eppinga, Helena M Verkooijen, John E O'Toole, Ilya Laufer, Daniel M Sciubba, Cordula Netzer, Wouter Foppen, Arjun Sahgal, Michael G Fehlings, Sheng-Fu L Lo, Charles G Fisher, Laurence D Rhines, Jeremy J Reynolds, Aron Lazary, Alessandro Gasbarrini, Nicolas Dea, Michael H Weber, Jorrit Jan Verlaan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21925682231222424\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Delphi study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to identify risk factors associated with the development and/or progression of neurological deficits in patients with metastatic spinal disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A three-round Delphi study was conducted between January-May 2023 including AO Spine members, comprising mainly neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons. In round 1, participants listed radiological factors, patient characteristics, tumor characteristics, previous cancer-related treatment factors and additional factors. In round 2, participants ranked the factors on importance per category and selected a top 9 from all factors. Kendall's W coefficient of concordance was calculated as a measure of consensus. In the final round, participants provided feedback on the rankings resulting from round 2. Lastly, the highest-ranking factors were more clearly defined and operationalized by an expert panel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over two hundred physicians and researchers participated in each round. The factors listed in the first round were collapsed into 12 radiological factors, 14 patient characteristics, 6 tumor characteristics and 12 previous cancer-related treatment factors. High agreement was found in round 3 on the top-half lists in each category and the overall top 9, originating from round 2. Kendall's W indicated strong agreement between the participants. 'Epidural spinal cord compression', 'aggressive tumor behavior' and 'mechanical instability' were deemed most influential for the development of neurological deficits.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides factors that may be related to the development and/or progression of neurological deficits in patients with metastatic spinal disease. This list can serve as a basis for future directions in prognostication research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\"15 1_suppl\",\"pages\":\"93S-103S\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11726512/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682231222424\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682231222424","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计:德尔菲研究:本研究旨在确定与转移性脊柱疾病患者神经功能缺损的发生和/或进展相关的风险因素:在 2023 年 1 月至 5 月期间进行了三轮德尔菲研究,参与者包括 AO Spine 会员,主要是神经外科医生和骨科医生。在第一轮中,参与者列出了放射学因素、患者特征、肿瘤特征、既往癌症相关治疗因素和其他因素。在第二轮中,参与者对每类因素的重要性进行排序,并从所有因素中选出前 9 个。Kendall's W 一致性系数被计算出来,作为衡量共识的标准。在最后一轮,参与者对第二轮得出的排名提供反馈意见。最后,专家小组对排名最高的因素进行了更明确的定义和操作:结果:两百多名医生和研究人员参加了每一轮评选。第一轮列出的因素被归纳为 12 个放射学因素、14 个患者特征、6 个肿瘤特征和 12 个既往癌症相关治疗因素。在第三轮中,每个类别中排名前半部分的名单和排名前 9 位的总名单(源于第二轮)的一致性很高。Kendall's W 表明参与者之间的一致性很高。硬膜外脊髓压迫"、"侵袭性肿瘤行为 "和 "机械不稳定性 "被认为对神经功能缺损的发生影响最大:本研究提供了可能与转移性脊柱疾病患者神经功能缺损的发生和/或进展有关的因素。这份清单可作为未来预后研究方向的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk Factors for the Development of Neurological Deficits in Metastatic Spinal Disease: An International, Multicenter Delphi Study.

Study design: Delphi study.

Objective: The objective of this study was to identify risk factors associated with the development and/or progression of neurological deficits in patients with metastatic spinal disease.

Methods: A three-round Delphi study was conducted between January-May 2023 including AO Spine members, comprising mainly neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons. In round 1, participants listed radiological factors, patient characteristics, tumor characteristics, previous cancer-related treatment factors and additional factors. In round 2, participants ranked the factors on importance per category and selected a top 9 from all factors. Kendall's W coefficient of concordance was calculated as a measure of consensus. In the final round, participants provided feedback on the rankings resulting from round 2. Lastly, the highest-ranking factors were more clearly defined and operationalized by an expert panel.

Results: Over two hundred physicians and researchers participated in each round. The factors listed in the first round were collapsed into 12 radiological factors, 14 patient characteristics, 6 tumor characteristics and 12 previous cancer-related treatment factors. High agreement was found in round 3 on the top-half lists in each category and the overall top 9, originating from round 2. Kendall's W indicated strong agreement between the participants. 'Epidural spinal cord compression', 'aggressive tumor behavior' and 'mechanical instability' were deemed most influential for the development of neurological deficits.

Conclusion: This study provides factors that may be related to the development and/or progression of neurological deficits in patients with metastatic spinal disease. This list can serve as a basis for future directions in prognostication research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
期刊最新文献
Are Randomized Trials Better? Comparison of Baseline Covariate Balance of a Propensity Score-Balanced Lumbar Spine IDE Trial and Comparable RCTs. Correlation Between Facet Tropism and Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament in the Cervical Spine. Frontline Voice: AO Spine Member Survey Regarding Spine Oncology Knowledge Generation and Translation Needs. Letter re: "Are Variable Screw Angle Change and Screw-To-Vertebral Body Ratio Associated with Radiographic Subsidence Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion?" Risk Factors Preventing Identification of the Microorganism Causing Vertebral Osteomyelitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1