血压在目标范围内的时间与不良健康结果:一项系统综述。

IF 6.9 1区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Hypertension Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.24013
Huairong Wang, Jialu Song, Zhike Liu, Huan Yu, Kun Wang, Xueying Qin, Yiqun Wu
{"title":"血压在目标范围内的时间与不良健康结果:一项系统综述。","authors":"Huairong Wang, Jialu Song, Zhike Liu, Huan Yu, Kun Wang, Xueying Qin, Yiqun Wu","doi":"10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.24013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Blood pressure (BP) time in target range (TTR) reflects the proportion of time that BP measurement is within a specified target range. We aim to summarize the evidence for relationships between TTR and adverse health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven databases were searched. After quality assessment and data extraction, meta-analyses were performed to generate pooled estimates of the association (hazard ratios) between TTR and health outcomes. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and cardiovascular death. Secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and adverse kidney events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all, 21 studies were included, mostly rated at low risk of bias. TTR was defined by systolic BP (SBP) in 15 studies and by both SBP and diastolic BP in 6 studies. Per SD increase of TTR was associated with significantly decreased risks of all-cause mortality (110-130 mm Hg SBP TTR: hazard ratios, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.82-0.89]; 120-140 mm Hg SBP TTR: 0.81 [95% CI, 0.70-0.94]; and 70-80 mm Hg diastolic BP TTR: 0.88 [95% CI, 0.83-0.93]), cardiovascular death (110-130 mm Hg SBP TTR: 0.83 [95% CI, 0.78-0.87]; 120-140 mm Hg SBP TTR: 0.76 [95% CI, 0.65-0.89]; and 70-80 mm Hg diastolic BP TTR: 0.85 [95% CI, 0.80-0.90]), major adverse cardiovascular events (120-140 mm Hg SBP TTR: 0.76 [95% CI, 0.70-0.83]), and heart failure (110-130 mm Hg SBP TTR: 0.84 [95% CI, 0.76-0.93] and 120-140 mm Hg SBP TTR: 0.78 [95% CI, 0.68-0.89]). However, there was not sufficient support for the association of TTR with myocardial infarction, stroke, atrial fibrillation, or adverse kidney events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher TTR was associated with reduced risks of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, major adverse cardiovascular events, and heart failure, highlighting the importance of sustained BP control in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/; Unique identifier: CRD42023486437.</p>","PeriodicalId":13042,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time in Target Range for Blood Pressure and Adverse Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Huairong Wang, Jialu Song, Zhike Liu, Huan Yu, Kun Wang, Xueying Qin, Yiqun Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.24013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Blood pressure (BP) time in target range (TTR) reflects the proportion of time that BP measurement is within a specified target range. We aim to summarize the evidence for relationships between TTR and adverse health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven databases were searched. After quality assessment and data extraction, meta-analyses were performed to generate pooled estimates of the association (hazard ratios) between TTR and health outcomes. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and cardiovascular death. Secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and adverse kidney events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all, 21 studies were included, mostly rated at low risk of bias. TTR was defined by systolic BP (SBP) in 15 studies and by both SBP and diastolic BP in 6 studies. Per SD increase of TTR was associated with significantly decreased risks of all-cause mortality (110-130 mm Hg SBP TTR: hazard ratios, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.82-0.89]; 120-140 mm Hg SBP TTR: 0.81 [95% CI, 0.70-0.94]; and 70-80 mm Hg diastolic BP TTR: 0.88 [95% CI, 0.83-0.93]), cardiovascular death (110-130 mm Hg SBP TTR: 0.83 [95% CI, 0.78-0.87]; 120-140 mm Hg SBP TTR: 0.76 [95% CI, 0.65-0.89]; and 70-80 mm Hg diastolic BP TTR: 0.85 [95% CI, 0.80-0.90]), major adverse cardiovascular events (120-140 mm Hg SBP TTR: 0.76 [95% CI, 0.70-0.83]), and heart failure (110-130 mm Hg SBP TTR: 0.84 [95% CI, 0.76-0.93] and 120-140 mm Hg SBP TTR: 0.78 [95% CI, 0.68-0.89]). However, there was not sufficient support for the association of TTR with myocardial infarction, stroke, atrial fibrillation, or adverse kidney events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher TTR was associated with reduced risks of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, major adverse cardiovascular events, and heart failure, highlighting the importance of sustained BP control in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/; Unique identifier: CRD42023486437.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hypertension\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.24013\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.24013","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:血压(BP)在目标范围内的时间(TTR)反映了血压测量在指定目标范围内的时间比例。我们旨在总结 TTR 与不良健康后果之间关系的证据:方法:检索了七个数据库。在进行质量评估和数据提取后,我们进行了荟萃分析,以得出 TTR 与健康结果之间关系的集合估计值(危险比)。主要结果为全因死亡率和心血管死亡。次要结果包括主要不良心血管事件、心肌梗死、中风、心力衰竭、心房颤动和不良肾脏事件:总共纳入了 21 项研究,大部分研究的偏倚风险较低。15项研究以收缩压(SBP)定义TTR,6项研究同时以收缩压和舒张压定义TTR。TTR 每增加 SD 与全因死亡(110-130 mm Hg 收缩压 TTR:危险比为 0.85 [95% CI, 0.82-0.89];120-140 mm Hg 收缩压 TTR:0.81 [95% CI, 0.70-0.94];70-80 mm Hg 舒张压 TTR:0.88 [95% CI, 0.83-0.93])、心血管死亡(110-130 mm Hg 收缩压 TTR:0.83 [95% CI, 0.78-0.87];120-140 mm Hg SBP TTR:0.76 [95% CI,0.65-0.89];70-80 mm Hg 舒张压 TTR:0.85 [95% CI,0.80-0.90])、主要不良心血管事件(120-140 mm Hg SBP TTR:0.76[95%CI,0.70-0.83])和心力衰竭(110-130 mm Hg SBP TTR:0.84 [95% CI,0.76-0.93] 和 120-140 mm Hg SBP TTR:0.78 [95% CI,0.68-0.89])。然而,TTR与心肌梗死、中风、心房颤动或肾脏不良事件的相关性没有得到充分支持:结论:TTR越高,全因死亡、心血管死亡、主要不良心血管事件和心力衰竭的风险越低,这突出了在临床实践中持续控制血压的重要性:URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/; Unique identifier:CRD42023486437。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Time in Target Range for Blood Pressure and Adverse Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Background: Blood pressure (BP) time in target range (TTR) reflects the proportion of time that BP measurement is within a specified target range. We aim to summarize the evidence for relationships between TTR and adverse health outcomes.

Methods: Seven databases were searched. After quality assessment and data extraction, meta-analyses were performed to generate pooled estimates of the association (hazard ratios) between TTR and health outcomes. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and cardiovascular death. Secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and adverse kidney events.

Results: In all, 21 studies were included, mostly rated at low risk of bias. TTR was defined by systolic BP (SBP) in 15 studies and by both SBP and diastolic BP in 6 studies. Per SD increase of TTR was associated with significantly decreased risks of all-cause mortality (110-130 mm Hg SBP TTR: hazard ratios, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.82-0.89]; 120-140 mm Hg SBP TTR: 0.81 [95% CI, 0.70-0.94]; and 70-80 mm Hg diastolic BP TTR: 0.88 [95% CI, 0.83-0.93]), cardiovascular death (110-130 mm Hg SBP TTR: 0.83 [95% CI, 0.78-0.87]; 120-140 mm Hg SBP TTR: 0.76 [95% CI, 0.65-0.89]; and 70-80 mm Hg diastolic BP TTR: 0.85 [95% CI, 0.80-0.90]), major adverse cardiovascular events (120-140 mm Hg SBP TTR: 0.76 [95% CI, 0.70-0.83]), and heart failure (110-130 mm Hg SBP TTR: 0.84 [95% CI, 0.76-0.93] and 120-140 mm Hg SBP TTR: 0.78 [95% CI, 0.68-0.89]). However, there was not sufficient support for the association of TTR with myocardial infarction, stroke, atrial fibrillation, or adverse kidney events.

Conclusions: Higher TTR was associated with reduced risks of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, major adverse cardiovascular events, and heart failure, highlighting the importance of sustained BP control in clinical practice.

Registration: URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/; Unique identifier: CRD42023486437.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hypertension
Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1006
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Hypertension presents top-tier articles on high blood pressure in each monthly release. These articles delve into basic science, clinical treatment, and prevention of hypertension and associated cardiovascular, metabolic, and renal conditions. Renowned for their lasting significance, these papers contribute to advancing our understanding and management of hypertension-related issues.
期刊最新文献
Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy and Brain Health in Midlife: The CARDIA Study. Irisin Improves Preeclampsia by Promoting Embryo Implantation and Vascular Remodeling. Caregiving and Hypertension in Younger Black Women: The Jackson Heart Study. ACE2, From the Kidney to SARS-CoV-2: Donald Seldin Award Lecture 2023. ATP2A3 in Primary Aldosteronism: Machine Learning-Based Discovery and Functional Validation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1