揭开莱卡奈单抗安全性的神秘面纱:利用FDA不良事件报告系统数据对不良事件进行综合分析。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Pub Date : 2025-01-12 DOI:10.1177/13872877241307246
Wukun Ge, Yingyan Yan, Yaoyao Hu, Shuainan Lin, Peizhi Mao
{"title":"揭开莱卡奈单抗安全性的神秘面纱:利用FDA不良事件报告系统数据对不良事件进行综合分析。","authors":"Wukun Ge, Yingyan Yan, Yaoyao Hu, Shuainan Lin, Peizhi Mao","doi":"10.1177/13872877241307246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lecanemab, a novel monoclonal antibody targeting amyloid-β, has shown promise in treating Alzheimer's disease. Comprehensive post-marketing safety data analysis is crucial to understand its real-world risk profile.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the safety profile of lecanemab using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), with a focus on nervous system disorders and amyloid-related imaging abnormalities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a disproportionality analysis using the FAERS database to evaluate the safety signals associated with lecanemab. Reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio, empirical Bayesian geometric mean, and information component were calculated at both system organ class (SOC) and preferred term (PT) levels. Additionally, we performed a time-to-onset analysis using Weibull shape parameter estimation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis at the SOC level revealed significant signals for nervous system disorders (ROR: 7.32, 95% CI: 6.69-8.00). At the PT level, strong signals were observed for amyloid-related imaging abnormalities, particularly those associated with microhemorrhages and oedema (ROR: 4122.81 and 3922.78, respectively). Headache was the most frequently reported adverse event (200 cases), followed by chills (107 cases) and fatigue (97 cases). Time-to-onset analysis showed a median time of 33 days (range: 1-1283) for all adverse events, with neurological events occurring slightly later (median: 42 days, range: 1-1260).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings highlight a distinct safety profile for lecanemab, with a predominant impact on the nervous system and a notable association with imaging abnormalities. These results underscore the importance of vigilant monitoring and further research to optimize the risk-benefit profile of lecanemab in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"13872877241307246"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unveiling the safety profile of lecanemab: A comprehensive analysis of adverse events using FDA adverse event reporting system data.\",\"authors\":\"Wukun Ge, Yingyan Yan, Yaoyao Hu, Shuainan Lin, Peizhi Mao\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13872877241307246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lecanemab, a novel monoclonal antibody targeting amyloid-β, has shown promise in treating Alzheimer's disease. Comprehensive post-marketing safety data analysis is crucial to understand its real-world risk profile.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the safety profile of lecanemab using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), with a focus on nervous system disorders and amyloid-related imaging abnormalities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a disproportionality analysis using the FAERS database to evaluate the safety signals associated with lecanemab. Reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio, empirical Bayesian geometric mean, and information component were calculated at both system organ class (SOC) and preferred term (PT) levels. Additionally, we performed a time-to-onset analysis using Weibull shape parameter estimation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis at the SOC level revealed significant signals for nervous system disorders (ROR: 7.32, 95% CI: 6.69-8.00). At the PT level, strong signals were observed for amyloid-related imaging abnormalities, particularly those associated with microhemorrhages and oedema (ROR: 4122.81 and 3922.78, respectively). Headache was the most frequently reported adverse event (200 cases), followed by chills (107 cases) and fatigue (97 cases). Time-to-onset analysis showed a median time of 33 days (range: 1-1283) for all adverse events, with neurological events occurring slightly later (median: 42 days, range: 1-1260).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings highlight a distinct safety profile for lecanemab, with a predominant impact on the nervous system and a notable association with imaging abnormalities. These results underscore the importance of vigilant monitoring and further research to optimize the risk-benefit profile of lecanemab in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"13872877241307246\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877241307246\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877241307246","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Lecanemab是一种靶向淀粉样蛋白-β的新型单克隆抗体,有望治疗阿尔茨海默病。全面的上市后安全数据分析对于了解其真实风险概况至关重要。目的:本研究旨在利用FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)的数据评估lecanemab的安全性,重点关注神经系统疾病和淀粉样蛋白相关影像学异常。方法:我们使用FAERS数据库进行了歧化分析,以评估与lecanemab相关的安全信号。在系统器官类别(SOC)和首选术语(PT)水平上计算报告优势比(ROR)、比例报告比、经验贝叶斯几何平均值和信息成分。此外,我们使用威布尔形状参数估计进行了开始时间分析。结果:SOC水平分析显示神经系统疾病的显著信号(ROR: 7.32, 95% CI: 6.69-8.00)。在PT水平上,可以观察到淀粉样蛋白相关的影像学异常,特别是与微出血和水肿相关的异常(ROR: 4122.81和3922.78)。头痛是最常见的不良反应(200例),其次是寒战(107例)和疲劳(97例)。发病时间分析显示,所有不良事件的中位时间为33天(范围:1-1283),神经系统事件发生时间稍晚(中位时间:42天,范围:1-1260)。结论:我们的研究结果强调了lecanemab具有明显的安全性,主要影响神经系统,并与影像学异常显著相关。这些结果强调了警惕监测和进一步研究的重要性,以优化临床实践中lecanemab的风险-收益概况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unveiling the safety profile of lecanemab: A comprehensive analysis of adverse events using FDA adverse event reporting system data.

Background: Lecanemab, a novel monoclonal antibody targeting amyloid-β, has shown promise in treating Alzheimer's disease. Comprehensive post-marketing safety data analysis is crucial to understand its real-world risk profile.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the safety profile of lecanemab using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), with a focus on nervous system disorders and amyloid-related imaging abnormalities.

Methods: We conducted a disproportionality analysis using the FAERS database to evaluate the safety signals associated with lecanemab. Reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio, empirical Bayesian geometric mean, and information component were calculated at both system organ class (SOC) and preferred term (PT) levels. Additionally, we performed a time-to-onset analysis using Weibull shape parameter estimation.

Results: Analysis at the SOC level revealed significant signals for nervous system disorders (ROR: 7.32, 95% CI: 6.69-8.00). At the PT level, strong signals were observed for amyloid-related imaging abnormalities, particularly those associated with microhemorrhages and oedema (ROR: 4122.81 and 3922.78, respectively). Headache was the most frequently reported adverse event (200 cases), followed by chills (107 cases) and fatigue (97 cases). Time-to-onset analysis showed a median time of 33 days (range: 1-1283) for all adverse events, with neurological events occurring slightly later (median: 42 days, range: 1-1260).

Conclusions: Our findings highlight a distinct safety profile for lecanemab, with a predominant impact on the nervous system and a notable association with imaging abnormalities. These results underscore the importance of vigilant monitoring and further research to optimize the risk-benefit profile of lecanemab in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.
期刊最新文献
Iron chelation by oral deferoxamine treatment decreased brain iron and iron signaling proteins. Longitudinal and concurrent C-reactive protein and diet associations with cognitive function in the population-based Tromsø study. Microglial polarization in Alzheimer's disease: Mechanisms, implications, and therapeutic opportunities. MicroRNA-based recent research developments in Alzheimer's disease. Unveiling the link between APOE ε4, environmental factors, and Alzheimer's disease in North Lebanon: A case-control study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1