基于保险状况的胃肠外科肿瘤护理质量。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1016/j.gassur.2025.101961
Samuel D. Butensky , Daniel Kerekes , Baylee F. Bakkila , Kevin G. Billingsley , Nita Ahuja , Caroline H. Johnson , Sajid A. Khan
{"title":"基于保险状况的胃肠外科肿瘤护理质量。","authors":"Samuel D. Butensky ,&nbsp;Daniel Kerekes ,&nbsp;Baylee F. Bakkila ,&nbsp;Kevin G. Billingsley ,&nbsp;Nita Ahuja ,&nbsp;Caroline H. Johnson ,&nbsp;Sajid A. Khan","doi":"10.1016/j.gassur.2025.101961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite efforts to expand insurance coverage, substantial inequalities persist, particularly in cancer treatment. This study aimed to evaluate whether quality disparities exist across major insurance plans for patients undergoing curative-intent resection for gastrointestinal (GI) cancers.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a retrospective study of adult patients in the National Cancer Database diagnosed with GI malignant neoplasms between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2020. The primary tumor organ sites include the anus, colon, esophagus, gallbladder, liver, other biliary organ, pancreas, peritoneum, rectum, rectosigmoid, small intestine, and stomach. Multivariate linear regression was used to evaluate the effect of insurance status on resection margin, adequacy of lymphadenectomy, and receipt of lymphadenectomy. A Cox proportional hazards model was used for survival analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 1,084,555 patients in this study, 594,013 (54.8%) had Medicare insurance, 380,287 (35.1%) had private insurance, 57,402 (5.3%) had Medicaid insurance, and 29,133 (2.7%) were uninsured. Privately insured patients were more likely to have negative margins (odds ratio [OR], 1.08; 95% CI, 1.06–1.10) and adequate lymphadenectomies (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.04–1.06) than Medicare-insured patients. Uninsured patients were the least likely to have negative margins (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.75–0.81) and adequate lymphadenectomies (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.92–0.99) than Medicare-insured patients. Non–Medicare-insured patients were more likely to receive adjuvant therapy, whereas Medicare-insured patients had higher omission rates because of comorbidities. Finally, multivariate survival analysis showed that Medicare-insured patients had a 14% increased risk of death compared with non–Medicare-insured patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Significant disparities in the quality of surgical oncology care exist based on insurance status. Healthcare policy interventions may be necessary to ensure equitable access to high-quality surgical GI cancer care in the United States.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15893,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"29 3","pages":"Article 101961"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of gastrointestinal surgical oncology care according to insurance status\",\"authors\":\"Samuel D. Butensky ,&nbsp;Daniel Kerekes ,&nbsp;Baylee F. Bakkila ,&nbsp;Kevin G. Billingsley ,&nbsp;Nita Ahuja ,&nbsp;Caroline H. Johnson ,&nbsp;Sajid A. Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gassur.2025.101961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite efforts to expand insurance coverage, substantial inequalities persist, particularly in cancer treatment. This study aimed to evaluate whether quality disparities exist across major insurance plans for patients undergoing curative-intent resection for gastrointestinal (GI) cancers.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a retrospective study of adult patients in the National Cancer Database diagnosed with GI malignant neoplasms between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2020. The primary tumor organ sites include the anus, colon, esophagus, gallbladder, liver, other biliary organ, pancreas, peritoneum, rectum, rectosigmoid, small intestine, and stomach. Multivariate linear regression was used to evaluate the effect of insurance status on resection margin, adequacy of lymphadenectomy, and receipt of lymphadenectomy. A Cox proportional hazards model was used for survival analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 1,084,555 patients in this study, 594,013 (54.8%) had Medicare insurance, 380,287 (35.1%) had private insurance, 57,402 (5.3%) had Medicaid insurance, and 29,133 (2.7%) were uninsured. Privately insured patients were more likely to have negative margins (odds ratio [OR], 1.08; 95% CI, 1.06–1.10) and adequate lymphadenectomies (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.04–1.06) than Medicare-insured patients. Uninsured patients were the least likely to have negative margins (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.75–0.81) and adequate lymphadenectomies (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.92–0.99) than Medicare-insured patients. Non–Medicare-insured patients were more likely to receive adjuvant therapy, whereas Medicare-insured patients had higher omission rates because of comorbidities. Finally, multivariate survival analysis showed that Medicare-insured patients had a 14% increased risk of death compared with non–Medicare-insured patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Significant disparities in the quality of surgical oncology care exist based on insurance status. Healthcare policy interventions may be necessary to ensure equitable access to high-quality surgical GI cancer care in the United States.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"volume\":\"29 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 101961\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1091255X25000204\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1091255X25000204","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管努力扩大保险覆盖范围,但实质性的不平等仍然存在,特别是在癌症治疗方面。我们的目的是评估是否存在质量差异的主要保险计划的患者接受治疗意图切除胃肠道(GI)癌症。方法:对2004年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间在国家癌症数据库(NCDB)中诊断为胃肠道恶性肿瘤的成年患者进行回顾性研究。原发肿瘤的器官部位有:肛门、结肠、食道、胆囊、肝脏、其他胆道、胰腺、腹膜、直肠、直肠乙状结肠、小肠和胃。采用多变量线性回归评估保险状况对切除边缘、淋巴结切除是否充分和接受淋巴结切除的影响。生存率分析采用Cox比例风险模型。结果:在本研究的1,084,555名患者中,54.8%的人有医疗保险,35.1%的人有私人保险,5.3%的人有医疗补助,2.7%的人没有保险。与医疗保险患者相比,私人保险患者更有可能出现负切缘(OR, 1.08 [95% CI, 1.06-1.10])和充分的淋巴结切除术(OR, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.04-1.06])。与有医疗保险的患者相比,未投保的患者最不可能出现阴性切缘(OR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.75-0.81])和充分的淋巴结切除术(OR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.92-0.99])。非医疗保险患者更有可能接受辅助治疗,而医疗保险患者由于合并症而有更高的遗漏率。最后,多变量生存分析显示,与非医保患者相比,医保患者的死亡风险增加了14%。结论:不同的保险状况在肿瘤外科治疗质量上存在显著差异。在美国,医疗保健政策干预可能是必要的,以确保公平获得高质量的胃肠道肿瘤手术治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quality of gastrointestinal surgical oncology care according to insurance status

Background

Despite efforts to expand insurance coverage, substantial inequalities persist, particularly in cancer treatment. This study aimed to evaluate whether quality disparities exist across major insurance plans for patients undergoing curative-intent resection for gastrointestinal (GI) cancers.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of adult patients in the National Cancer Database diagnosed with GI malignant neoplasms between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2020. The primary tumor organ sites include the anus, colon, esophagus, gallbladder, liver, other biliary organ, pancreas, peritoneum, rectum, rectosigmoid, small intestine, and stomach. Multivariate linear regression was used to evaluate the effect of insurance status on resection margin, adequacy of lymphadenectomy, and receipt of lymphadenectomy. A Cox proportional hazards model was used for survival analysis.

Results

Of the 1,084,555 patients in this study, 594,013 (54.8%) had Medicare insurance, 380,287 (35.1%) had private insurance, 57,402 (5.3%) had Medicaid insurance, and 29,133 (2.7%) were uninsured. Privately insured patients were more likely to have negative margins (odds ratio [OR], 1.08; 95% CI, 1.06–1.10) and adequate lymphadenectomies (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.04–1.06) than Medicare-insured patients. Uninsured patients were the least likely to have negative margins (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.75–0.81) and adequate lymphadenectomies (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.92–0.99) than Medicare-insured patients. Non–Medicare-insured patients were more likely to receive adjuvant therapy, whereas Medicare-insured patients had higher omission rates because of comorbidities. Finally, multivariate survival analysis showed that Medicare-insured patients had a 14% increased risk of death compared with non–Medicare-insured patients.

Conclusion

Significant disparities in the quality of surgical oncology care exist based on insurance status. Healthcare policy interventions may be necessary to ensure equitable access to high-quality surgical GI cancer care in the United States.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery is a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal that updates the surgeon on the latest developments in gastrointestinal surgery. The journal includes original articles on surgery of the digestive tract; gastrointestinal images; "How I Do It" articles, subject reviews, book reports, editorial columns, the SSAT Presidential Address, articles by a guest orator, symposia, letters, results of conferences and more. This is the official publication of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. The journal functions as an outstanding forum for continuing education in surgery and diseases of the gastrointestinal tract.
期刊最新文献
Colonic metastasis of primary lung adenocarcinoma. The First International Experience with Histotripsy: A Safety Analysis of 230 Cases. Recurrence Patterns and Prediction of Survival After Recurrence for Gallbladder Cancer. Perforated peptic ulcer: close or patch a century-old controversy. Calcified Pancreatic Cyst in a Woman Without History of Pancreatitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1