头皮神经阻滞对烟雾病联合血运重建术后症状性脑高灌注综合征的影响。

IF 2.3 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1097/ANA.0000000000001024
Seungeun Choi, Jung Yeon Park, Woo-Young Jo, Kyung Won Shin, Hee-Pyoung Park, Sung Ho Lee, Won-Sang Cho, Jeong Eun Kim, Hyongmin Oh
{"title":"头皮神经阻滞对烟雾病联合血运重建术后症状性脑高灌注综合征的影响。","authors":"Seungeun Choi, Jung Yeon Park, Woo-Young Jo, Kyung Won Shin, Hee-Pyoung Park, Sung Ho Lee, Won-Sang Cho, Jeong Eun Kim, Hyongmin Oh","doi":"10.1097/ANA.0000000000001024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Strict blood pressure control can be used to prevent or treat cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome. This study investigated whether scalp nerve block (SNB) is associated with a reduced risk of postoperative symptomatic cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (SCHS) by reducing postoperative blood pressure in adult patients who underwent combined revascularization surgery for moyamoya disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were retrospectively divided into the SNB (n=167) and control (n=221) groups depending on whether SNB was performed immediately before placement of wound dressings at the end of surgery. Postoperative SCHS was defined as new-onset postoperative neurological deficits with a focal increase in cerebral blood flow at the perianastomosis site in the absence of infarction or hemorrhage on postoperative brain imaging. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance preoperative variables between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of postoperative SCHS did not differ between the SNB and control groups (61 [36.5%] vs. 102 [46.2%], P=0.072), but its duration was shorter in the SNB group (4 [2-6] vs. 5 [3-7] days, P=0.021). Although of limited clinical relevance, the SNB group had lower postoperative pain scores and systolic blood pressures at postoperative days 0 to 1 and a shorter intensive care unit stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite some potential benefits, SNB was not associated with a reduced incidence of postoperative SCHS in adult patients who underwent combined revascularization surgery for moyamoya disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":16550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Scalp Nerve Block on Symptomatic Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome After Combined Revascularization Surgery for Moyamoya Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Seungeun Choi, Jung Yeon Park, Woo-Young Jo, Kyung Won Shin, Hee-Pyoung Park, Sung Ho Lee, Won-Sang Cho, Jeong Eun Kim, Hyongmin Oh\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ANA.0000000000001024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Strict blood pressure control can be used to prevent or treat cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome. This study investigated whether scalp nerve block (SNB) is associated with a reduced risk of postoperative symptomatic cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (SCHS) by reducing postoperative blood pressure in adult patients who underwent combined revascularization surgery for moyamoya disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were retrospectively divided into the SNB (n=167) and control (n=221) groups depending on whether SNB was performed immediately before placement of wound dressings at the end of surgery. Postoperative SCHS was defined as new-onset postoperative neurological deficits with a focal increase in cerebral blood flow at the perianastomosis site in the absence of infarction or hemorrhage on postoperative brain imaging. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance preoperative variables between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of postoperative SCHS did not differ between the SNB and control groups (61 [36.5%] vs. 102 [46.2%], P=0.072), but its duration was shorter in the SNB group (4 [2-6] vs. 5 [3-7] days, P=0.021). Although of limited clinical relevance, the SNB group had lower postoperative pain scores and systolic blood pressures at postoperative days 0 to 1 and a shorter intensive care unit stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite some potential benefits, SNB was not associated with a reduced incidence of postoperative SCHS in adult patients who underwent combined revascularization surgery for moyamoya disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000001024\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000001024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:严格控制血压可预防或治疗脑高灌注综合征。本研究调查了头皮神经阻滞(SNB)是否通过降低成人烟雾病联合血运重建术患者的术后血压与术后症状性脑高灌注综合征(SCHS)的风险降低相关。方法:根据手术结束后伤口敷料放置前是否立即进行SNB,将患者回顾性分为SNB组(167例)和对照组(221例)。术后SCHS被定义为新发的术后神经功能缺损,在术后脑成像没有梗死或出血的情况下,吻合口周围脑血流局灶性增加。采用治疗加权逆概率法平衡两组术前变量。结果:SNB组与对照组术后SCHS发生率无差异(61[36.5%]对102 [46.2%],P=0.072),但SNB组的持续时间较短(4[2-6]对5[3-7]天,P=0.021)。尽管临床相关性有限,但SNB组在术后0至1天的术后疼痛评分和收缩压较低,重症监护病房住院时间较短。结论:尽管有一些潜在的益处,但SNB与接受烟雾病联合血运重建术的成年患者术后SCHS发生率的降低无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of Scalp Nerve Block on Symptomatic Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome After Combined Revascularization Surgery for Moyamoya Disease.

Background: Strict blood pressure control can be used to prevent or treat cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome. This study investigated whether scalp nerve block (SNB) is associated with a reduced risk of postoperative symptomatic cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (SCHS) by reducing postoperative blood pressure in adult patients who underwent combined revascularization surgery for moyamoya disease.

Methods: Patients were retrospectively divided into the SNB (n=167) and control (n=221) groups depending on whether SNB was performed immediately before placement of wound dressings at the end of surgery. Postoperative SCHS was defined as new-onset postoperative neurological deficits with a focal increase in cerebral blood flow at the perianastomosis site in the absence of infarction or hemorrhage on postoperative brain imaging. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance preoperative variables between the 2 groups.

Results: The incidence of postoperative SCHS did not differ between the SNB and control groups (61 [36.5%] vs. 102 [46.2%], P=0.072), but its duration was shorter in the SNB group (4 [2-6] vs. 5 [3-7] days, P=0.021). Although of limited clinical relevance, the SNB group had lower postoperative pain scores and systolic blood pressures at postoperative days 0 to 1 and a shorter intensive care unit stay.

Conclusions: Despite some potential benefits, SNB was not associated with a reduced incidence of postoperative SCHS in adult patients who underwent combined revascularization surgery for moyamoya disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
10.80%
发文量
119
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology (JNA) is a peer-reviewed publication directed to an audience of neuroanesthesiologists, neurosurgeons, neurosurgical monitoring specialists, neurosurgical support staff, and Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit personnel. The journal publishes original peer-reviewed studies in the form of Clinical Investigations, Laboratory Investigations, Clinical Reports, Review Articles, Journal Club synopses of current literature from related journals, presentation of Points of View on controversial issues, Book Reviews, Correspondence, and Abstracts from affiliated neuroanesthesiology societies. JNA is the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care, the Neuroanaesthesia and Critical Care Society of Great Britain and Ireland, the Association de Neuro-Anesthésiologie Réanimation de langue Française, the Wissenschaftlicher Arbeitskreis Neuroanästhesie der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizen, the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutschsprachiger Neuroanästhesisten und Neuro-Intensivmediziner, the Korean Society of Neuroanesthesia, the Japanese Society of Neuroanesthesia and Critical Care, the Neuroanesthesiology Chapter of the Colegio Mexicano de Anesthesiología, the Indian Society of Neuroanesthesiology and Critical Care, and the Thai Society for Neuroanesthesia.
期刊最新文献
Anesthesia for the Pregnant Patient Undergoing Intracranial Procedures. Epidemiology of Post-craniotomy Hypertension and Its Association With Adverse Outcome(s): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Effects of Scalp Nerve Block on Symptomatic Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome After Combined Revascularization Surgery for Moyamoya Disease. Comparison of Intubating Conditions Between Direct Laryngoscopy and C-MAC Video-laryngoscopy in Patients With Simulated Cervical Spine Immobilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. The Role of Processed Electroencephalography in the Detection and Management of Acute Cerebral Ischemia: A Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1