多组学模型预测非小细胞肺癌患者化疗和放疗后预后:一项多中心研究

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Radiotherapy and Oncology Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2025.110715
Yuteng Pan, Liting Shi, Yuan Liu, Jyh-Cheng Chen, Jianfeng Qiu
{"title":"多组学模型预测非小细胞肺癌患者化疗和放疗后预后:一项多中心研究","authors":"Yuteng Pan, Liting Shi, Yuan Liu, Jyh-Cheng Chen, Jianfeng Qiu","doi":"10.1016/j.radonc.2025.110715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Quantifying tumor heterogeneity from various dimensions is crucial for precise treatment. This study aimed to develop and validate multi-omics models based on the computed tomography images, pathological images, dose and clinical information to predict treatment response and overall survival of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients undergoing chemotherapy and radiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 220 NSCLC patients from three centers. Following feature extraction and selection, single-omics and multi-omics models were built for treatment response and overall survival prediction. The performance of treatment response models was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) and box plots. For overall survival analysis, the model's evaluation included AUC, concordance index (C-index), Kaplan-Meier curves, and calibration curves. Shapley values were used to assess the contribution of different features to multi-omics models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multi-omics models consistently exhibited superior discriminative ability compared to single-omics models in predicting both treatment response and overall survival. For treatment response, the three all-modality models achieved AUC values of 0.87, 0.91, and 0.82 in the external validation set, respectively. In overall survival analysis, the three all-modality models demonstrated AUC values and C-index of 0.73/0.72, 0.80/0.77, 0.79/0.78 in the external validation set, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multi-omics prediction models demonstrated superior predictive ability with robustness and interpretability. By predicting treatment response and overall survival in NSCLC patients, these models have the potential to assist clinician optimizing treatment plans, supporting individualized treatment strategies, improving the tumor control probability and prolonging the patients' survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":21041,"journal":{"name":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"110715"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-omics models for predicting prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer patients following chemotherapy and radiotherapy: A multi-center study.\",\"authors\":\"Yuteng Pan, Liting Shi, Yuan Liu, Jyh-Cheng Chen, Jianfeng Qiu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radonc.2025.110715\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Quantifying tumor heterogeneity from various dimensions is crucial for precise treatment. This study aimed to develop and validate multi-omics models based on the computed tomography images, pathological images, dose and clinical information to predict treatment response and overall survival of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients undergoing chemotherapy and radiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 220 NSCLC patients from three centers. Following feature extraction and selection, single-omics and multi-omics models were built for treatment response and overall survival prediction. The performance of treatment response models was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) and box plots. For overall survival analysis, the model's evaluation included AUC, concordance index (C-index), Kaplan-Meier curves, and calibration curves. Shapley values were used to assess the contribution of different features to multi-omics models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multi-omics models consistently exhibited superior discriminative ability compared to single-omics models in predicting both treatment response and overall survival. For treatment response, the three all-modality models achieved AUC values of 0.87, 0.91, and 0.82 in the external validation set, respectively. In overall survival analysis, the three all-modality models demonstrated AUC values and C-index of 0.73/0.72, 0.80/0.77, 0.79/0.78 in the external validation set, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multi-omics prediction models demonstrated superior predictive ability with robustness and interpretability. By predicting treatment response and overall survival in NSCLC patients, these models have the potential to assist clinician optimizing treatment plans, supporting individualized treatment strategies, improving the tumor control probability and prolonging the patients' survival.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiotherapy and Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"110715\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiotherapy and Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2025.110715\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2025.110715","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:从各个维度量化肿瘤异质性对精确治疗至关重要。本研究旨在建立和验证基于ct图像、病理图像、剂量和临床信息的多组学模型,以预测非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者接受化疗和放疗的治疗反应和总生存期。材料和方法:本回顾性研究包括来自三个中心的220例非小细胞肺癌患者。在特征提取和选择之后,建立单组学和多组学模型用于治疗反应和总体生存预测。采用曲线下面积(AUC)和箱形图对治疗反应模型的性能进行评价。对于总生存分析,模型的评价包括AUC、一致性指数(C-index)、Kaplan-Meier曲线和校准曲线。Shapley值用于评估不同特征对多组学模型的贡献。结果:与单组学模型相比,多组学模型在预测治疗反应和总生存期方面始终表现出优越的判别能力。对于治疗反应,三种全模态模型在外部验证集中的AUC值分别为0.87、0.91和0.82。在总生存分析中,三种全模态模型在外部验证集中的AUC值和c指数分别为0.73/0.72、0.80/0.77和0.79/0.78。结论:多组学预测模型具有较强的预测能力、稳健性和可解释性。通过预测NSCLC患者的治疗反应和总生存期,这些模型有可能帮助临床医生优化治疗方案,支持个体化治疗策略,提高肿瘤控制概率,延长患者的生存期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multi-omics models for predicting prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer patients following chemotherapy and radiotherapy: A multi-center study.

Background and purpose: Quantifying tumor heterogeneity from various dimensions is crucial for precise treatment. This study aimed to develop and validate multi-omics models based on the computed tomography images, pathological images, dose and clinical information to predict treatment response and overall survival of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients undergoing chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 220 NSCLC patients from three centers. Following feature extraction and selection, single-omics and multi-omics models were built for treatment response and overall survival prediction. The performance of treatment response models was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) and box plots. For overall survival analysis, the model's evaluation included AUC, concordance index (C-index), Kaplan-Meier curves, and calibration curves. Shapley values were used to assess the contribution of different features to multi-omics models.

Results: Multi-omics models consistently exhibited superior discriminative ability compared to single-omics models in predicting both treatment response and overall survival. For treatment response, the three all-modality models achieved AUC values of 0.87, 0.91, and 0.82 in the external validation set, respectively. In overall survival analysis, the three all-modality models demonstrated AUC values and C-index of 0.73/0.72, 0.80/0.77, 0.79/0.78 in the external validation set, respectively.

Conclusion: Multi-omics prediction models demonstrated superior predictive ability with robustness and interpretability. By predicting treatment response and overall survival in NSCLC patients, these models have the potential to assist clinician optimizing treatment plans, supporting individualized treatment strategies, improving the tumor control probability and prolonging the patients' survival.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Radiotherapy and Oncology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
2445
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Radiotherapy and Oncology publishes papers describing original research as well as review articles. It covers areas of interest relating to radiation oncology. This includes: clinical radiotherapy, combined modality treatment, translational studies, epidemiological outcomes, imaging, dosimetry, and radiation therapy planning, experimental work in radiobiology, chemobiology, hyperthermia and tumour biology, as well as data science in radiation oncology and physics aspects relevant to oncology.Papers on more general aspects of interest to the radiation oncologist including chemotherapy, surgery and immunology are also published.
期刊最新文献
Deglutition preservation after swallowing (SWOARs)-sparing IMRT in head and neck cancers: definitive results of a multicenter prospective study of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO). Association of the time of day of chemoradiotherapy and durvalumab with tumor control in lung cancer. Aiming for patient safety indicators in radiation oncology - Results from a systematic literature review as part of the PaSaGeRO study. Randomized trials: When scientific rigor meets field reality. A prognostic and predictive model based on deep learning to identify optimal candidates for intensity-modulated radiotherapy alone in patients with stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A retrospective multicenter study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1