Ibrahim Mohammed El Sherif, Adham Magdy Haggag, Mohamed Hussen Abbas, Walid Y Kamel
{"title":"Insulin Degludec vs Insulin Glargine for Glycemic Control in Critical Illness Hyperglycemia.","authors":"Ibrahim Mohammed El Sherif, Adham Magdy Haggag, Mohamed Hussen Abbas, Walid Y Kamel","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim and background: </strong>Hyperglycemia is a serious condition and associated with an increased risk of complications and mortality in both critically ill and non-critically ill people. Improvement in the glycemic level reduces the length of hospital stay, systemic infections and short- and long-term mortality. The aim was to test the effectiveness of insulin degludec vs insulin glargine and regular insulin in controlling blood sugar in patients with critical hyperglycemia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Using random control trial, the patients were randomly divided into three equal groups-group R, group G and group D. Each group included 30 patients. Group G was managed using regular insulin together with an insulin glargine. Group D was managed using regular insulin together with an insulin degludec. However, group R was managed using only regular insulin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of hypoglycemia was statistically more significant in the group of regular insulin than in groups G and group D with a <i>p</i>-value 0.0069. There was no statistically significant difference between the three groups regarding the frequency of hypoglycemia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultra-long-acting insulin can effectively control random blood sugar (RBS) with a decrease in the total dose of insulin used. It is recommended that using insulin degludec is a safe and effective alternative to regular insulin for glycemic control in critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>El Sherif IM, Haggag AM, Abbas MH, Kamel WY. Insulin Degludec vs Insulin Glargine for Glycemic Control in Critical Illness Hyperglycemia. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025;29(1):52-58.</p>","PeriodicalId":47664,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","volume":"29 1","pages":"52-58"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11719542/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的和背景:高血糖是一种严重的疾病,与危重病人和非危重病人并发症和死亡风险的增加有关。改善血糖水平可缩短住院时间,减少全身感染,降低短期和长期死亡率。该研究旨在测试德鲁达胰岛素与格列美脲胰岛素和普通胰岛素在控制危重高血糖患者血糖方面的有效性:采用随机对照试验,将患者随机分为三个等量组--R组、G组和D组。G 组使用普通胰岛素和格列卫胰岛素。D 组使用普通胰岛素和德格列奈胰岛素。然而,R 组仅使用普通胰岛素:结果:与 G 组和 D 组相比,使用普通胰岛素组的低血糖发生率更高,P 值为 0.0069。在低血糖发生频率方面,三组之间没有明显的统计学差异:结论:超长效胰岛素可有效控制随机血糖,同时减少胰岛素的总剂量。结论:超长效胰岛素可有效控制随机血糖(RBS),同时减少胰岛素的总用量,建议重症患者使用德鲁达胰岛素控制血糖,它是普通胰岛素的安全有效替代品:El Sherif IM, Haggag AM, Abbas MH, Kamel WY.重症高血糖患者血糖控制的胰岛素 Degludec 与胰岛素 Glargine。Indian J Crit Care Med 2025;29(1):52-58.
Insulin Degludec vs Insulin Glargine for Glycemic Control in Critical Illness Hyperglycemia.
Aim and background: Hyperglycemia is a serious condition and associated with an increased risk of complications and mortality in both critically ill and non-critically ill people. Improvement in the glycemic level reduces the length of hospital stay, systemic infections and short- and long-term mortality. The aim was to test the effectiveness of insulin degludec vs insulin glargine and regular insulin in controlling blood sugar in patients with critical hyperglycemia.
Materials and methods: Using random control trial, the patients were randomly divided into three equal groups-group R, group G and group D. Each group included 30 patients. Group G was managed using regular insulin together with an insulin glargine. Group D was managed using regular insulin together with an insulin degludec. However, group R was managed using only regular insulin.
Results: The incidence of hypoglycemia was statistically more significant in the group of regular insulin than in groups G and group D with a p-value 0.0069. There was no statistically significant difference between the three groups regarding the frequency of hypoglycemia.
Conclusion: Ultra-long-acting insulin can effectively control random blood sugar (RBS) with a decrease in the total dose of insulin used. It is recommended that using insulin degludec is a safe and effective alternative to regular insulin for glycemic control in critically ill patients.
How to cite this article: El Sherif IM, Haggag AM, Abbas MH, Kamel WY. Insulin Degludec vs Insulin Glargine for Glycemic Control in Critical Illness Hyperglycemia. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025;29(1):52-58.
期刊介绍:
Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine (ISSN 0972-5229) is specialty periodical published under the auspices of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine. Journal encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the fields of critical and emergency medicine.