深度扭曲中的发展不变性。

IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Psychology and Aging Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1037/pag0000869
C J Brainerd, D M Bialer, X Liu, M Chang
{"title":"深度扭曲中的发展不变性。","authors":"C J Brainerd, D M Bialer, X Liu, M Chang","doi":"10.1037/pag0000869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recently, a distinction has been drawn between conventional false memories, which misrepresent specific facts, and deep distortions, which misrepresent relations that connect facts. We report the first study of adult developmental trends in deep distortions, using a paradigm in which people make conjoint recognition judgments about incompatible facts (e.g., Was Einstein born in Austria, Germany, or Switzerland?). As conventional false memories increase over the adult lifespan, it is natural to expect that deep distortions will do likewise. Surprisingly, however, the modal explanation of adult increases in false memory predicts that deep distortions will be developmentally invariant. We tested that prediction in two experiments that measured three deep distortions (violations of the logical laws of additivity, countable additivity, and universal event) in memory for real-world incompatibility relations (e.g., size of planets, geographical location of companies, people in historical events). In Experiment 1, robust violations of all three laws were detected in younger adults (<i>N</i> = 105; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 20), and as predicted, those violations did not increase in adults (<i>N</i> = 182; Mage = 33) or older adults (<i>N</i> = 176; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 62). Experiment 2 was designed to test whether deep distortions would increase with age when there was stronger support for retrieving verbatim memories, but once again, deep distortion levels were the same in young adults (<i>N</i> = 81; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 19), adults (<i>N</i> = 167; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 34), and older adults (<i>N</i> = 170; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 62). Conjoint recognition analyses revealed that throughout the adult lifespan, verbatim memory played no role in deep distortions. Other analyses revealed that although incompatible facts are perfectly compensatory in the real world (Einstein could only be born in Germany to the extent that he was not born in Austria or Switzerland), memory for incompatible facts is noncompensatory throughout the adult lifespan. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48426,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Aging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developmental invariance in deep distortions.\",\"authors\":\"C J Brainerd, D M Bialer, X Liu, M Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/pag0000869\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Recently, a distinction has been drawn between conventional false memories, which misrepresent specific facts, and deep distortions, which misrepresent relations that connect facts. We report the first study of adult developmental trends in deep distortions, using a paradigm in which people make conjoint recognition judgments about incompatible facts (e.g., Was Einstein born in Austria, Germany, or Switzerland?). As conventional false memories increase over the adult lifespan, it is natural to expect that deep distortions will do likewise. Surprisingly, however, the modal explanation of adult increases in false memory predicts that deep distortions will be developmentally invariant. We tested that prediction in two experiments that measured three deep distortions (violations of the logical laws of additivity, countable additivity, and universal event) in memory for real-world incompatibility relations (e.g., size of planets, geographical location of companies, people in historical events). In Experiment 1, robust violations of all three laws were detected in younger adults (<i>N</i> = 105; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 20), and as predicted, those violations did not increase in adults (<i>N</i> = 182; Mage = 33) or older adults (<i>N</i> = 176; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 62). Experiment 2 was designed to test whether deep distortions would increase with age when there was stronger support for retrieving verbatim memories, but once again, deep distortion levels were the same in young adults (<i>N</i> = 81; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 19), adults (<i>N</i> = 167; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 34), and older adults (<i>N</i> = 170; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 62). Conjoint recognition analyses revealed that throughout the adult lifespan, verbatim memory played no role in deep distortions. Other analyses revealed that although incompatible facts are perfectly compensatory in the real world (Einstein could only be born in Germany to the extent that he was not born in Austria or Switzerland), memory for incompatible facts is noncompensatory throughout the adult lifespan. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology and Aging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology and Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000869\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology and Aging","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000869","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近,人们对传统错误记忆和深度扭曲记忆进行了区分,前者歪曲了具体事实,后者歪曲了联系事实的关系。我们报告了第一个关于深度扭曲的成人发展趋势的研究,使用了一个范式,在这个范式中,人们对不相容的事实做出共同的识别判断(例如,爱因斯坦是出生在奥地利、德国还是瑞士?)由于传统的错误记忆会在成年人的一生中不断增加,我们很自然地预计深度扭曲也会如此。然而,令人惊讶的是,对成人错误记忆增加的模态解释预测,深度扭曲将是发展不变的。我们在两个实验中测试了这一预测,这些实验测量了现实世界不相容关系(例如,行星的大小、公司的地理位置、历史事件中的人物)记忆中的三种深度扭曲(违反可加性、可数可加性和普遍事件的逻辑规律)。在实验1中,年轻人明显违反了这三条定律(N = 105;Mage = 20),正如预测的那样,这些违规行为在成人中没有增加(N = 182;33)或老年人(N = 176;法师= 62)。实验2旨在测试深度扭曲是否会随着年龄的增长而增加,当有更强的逐字记忆支持检索时,但同样,深度扭曲水平在年轻人中是相同的(N = 81;法师= 19),成人(N = 167;老年人(N = 170;法师= 62)。联合识别分析显示,在整个成年人的一生中,逐字记忆在深度扭曲中没有作用。其他分析显示,尽管不相容的事实在现实世界中是完全补偿的(爱因斯坦只有在他不是出生在奥地利或瑞士的情况下才可能出生在德国),但对不相容事实的记忆在整个成年人的一生中都是不补偿的。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Developmental invariance in deep distortions.

Recently, a distinction has been drawn between conventional false memories, which misrepresent specific facts, and deep distortions, which misrepresent relations that connect facts. We report the first study of adult developmental trends in deep distortions, using a paradigm in which people make conjoint recognition judgments about incompatible facts (e.g., Was Einstein born in Austria, Germany, or Switzerland?). As conventional false memories increase over the adult lifespan, it is natural to expect that deep distortions will do likewise. Surprisingly, however, the modal explanation of adult increases in false memory predicts that deep distortions will be developmentally invariant. We tested that prediction in two experiments that measured three deep distortions (violations of the logical laws of additivity, countable additivity, and universal event) in memory for real-world incompatibility relations (e.g., size of planets, geographical location of companies, people in historical events). In Experiment 1, robust violations of all three laws were detected in younger adults (N = 105; Mage = 20), and as predicted, those violations did not increase in adults (N = 182; Mage = 33) or older adults (N = 176; Mage = 62). Experiment 2 was designed to test whether deep distortions would increase with age when there was stronger support for retrieving verbatim memories, but once again, deep distortion levels were the same in young adults (N = 81; Mage = 19), adults (N = 167; Mage = 34), and older adults (N = 170; Mage = 62). Conjoint recognition analyses revealed that throughout the adult lifespan, verbatim memory played no role in deep distortions. Other analyses revealed that although incompatible facts are perfectly compensatory in the real world (Einstein could only be born in Germany to the extent that he was not born in Austria or Switzerland), memory for incompatible facts is noncompensatory throughout the adult lifespan. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
10.80%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Psychology and Aging publishes original articles on adult development and aging. Such original articles include reports of research that may be applied, biobehavioral, clinical, educational, experimental (laboratory, field, or naturalistic studies), methodological, or psychosocial. Although the emphasis is on original research investigations, occasional theoretical analyses of research issues, practical clinical problems, or policy may appear, as well as critical reviews of a content area in adult development and aging. Clinical case studies that have theoretical significance are also appropriate. Brief reports are acceptable with the author"s agreement not to submit a full report to another journal.
期刊最新文献
Can goal reminders reduce the Stroop effect in older adults? Emotion regulation success in older adults with and without mild cognitive impairment. Neural biomarkers of age-related memory change. Advancing with age: Older adults excel in comprehension of novel metaphors. Age and sex differences in emotion perception are influenced by emotional category and communication channel.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1